World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mats Tysklind

Mats Tysklind

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
70
Citations
26709
World Ranking
1646
National Ranking
29

Chemistry

D-Index
68
Citations
25344
World Ranking
6400
National Ranking
82

Mats Tysklind publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mats Tysklind sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 295 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mats Tysklind D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mats Tysklind sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mats Tysklind is affiliated with Umeå University in Sweden and has made contributions primarily in the field of Environmental Science. Their research spans several subfields, including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pollution, Environmental Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Water Science and Technology.

The main focus of Mats Tysklind's work involves topics such as Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Air Quality and Health Impacts, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Biofuel Production and Bioconversion, and Groundwater Flow and Contamination Studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Tysklind include Terry F. Bidleman, Venkata K.K. Upadhyayula, Xianliang Wang, Dimitris Athanassiadis, and Dalia M. M. Yacout.

The scientist has published in multiple venues, with prominent appearances in The Science of The Total Environment, Environmental Science & Technology, SSRN Electronic Journal, Environmental Pollution, and Environment International.

Recent papers authored by or involving Tysklind include:

  • Towards better process management in wastewater treatment plants: Process analytics based on SHAP values for tree-based machine learning methods, 2021, Journal of Environmental Management
  • A machine learning framework to improve effluent quality control in wastewater treatment plants, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Assessment of the environmental impact of polymeric membrane production, 2021, Journal of Membrane Science
  • A sustainable performance assessment framework for circular management of municipal wastewater treatment plants, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Environmental Impact and Environmental Cost Assessment of Methanol Production from wood biomass, 2020, Environmental Pollution

Best Publications

  • The 2005 World Health Organization reevaluation of human and Mammalian toxic equivalency factors for dioxins and dioxin-like compounds.

    Martin Van den Berg;Linda S. Birnbaum;Michael Denison;Mike De Vito

  • Toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) for PCBs, PCDDs, PCDFs for humans and wildlife

    M. van den Berg;L. Birnbaum;A.T.C. Bosveld;B. Brunstrom

  • Contamination of surface, ground, and drinking water from pharmaceutical production.

    Jerker Fick;Hanna Söderström;Richard H. Lindberg;Chau Phan

  • Photolytic Debromination of Decabromodiphenyl Ether (BDE 209)

    Gunilla Söderström;Ulla Sellström;Cynthia A de Wit;Mats Tysklind

  • Screening of Human Antibiotic Substances and Determination of Weekly Mass Flows in Five Sewage Treatment Plants in Sweden

    Richard H Lindberg;Patrik Wennberg;Magnus I Johansson;Mats Tysklind

  • Determination of antibiotic substances in hospital sewage water using solid phase extraction and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and group analogue internal standards.

    Richard Lindberg;Per-Åke Jarnheimer;Björn Olsen;Magnus Johansson

  • Sources, Fate, and Toxic Hazards of Oxygenated Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) at PAH- contaminated Sites

    Staffan Lundstedt;Paul A. White;Christine L. Lemieux;Krista D. Lynes

  • Dioxin- and POP-contaminated sites—contemporary and future relevance and challenges

    Roland Weber;Caroline Gaus;Mats Tysklind;Paul Johnston

  • Behavior of fluoroquinolones and trimethoprim during mechanical, chemical, and active sludge treatment of sewage water and digestion of sludge.

    Richard H Lindberg;Ulrika Olofsson;Per Rendahl;Magnus I Johansson

  • Assessing the environmental fate of chemicals of emerging concern: a case study of the polybrominated diphenyl ethers

    Anna Palm;Ian T. Cousins;Donald Mackay;Mats Tysklind

  • Elucidating selection processes for antibiotic resistance in sewage treatment plants using metagenomics

    Johan Bengtsson-Palme;Rickard Hammarén;Chandan Pal;Marcus Östman

  • Determination of sorption of seventy-five pharmaceuticals in sewage sludge

    Maritha Hörsing;Anna Ledin;Roman Grabic;Jerker Fick

  • Overview on environmental fate of chlorinated dioxins and dibenzofurans. Sources, levels and isomeric pattern in various matrices

    Christoffer Rappe;Rolf Andersson;Per-Anders Bergqvist;Christina Brohede

  • Therapeutic levels of levonorgestrel detected in blood plasma of fish: results from screening rainbow trout exposed to treated sewage effluents.

    Jerker Fick;Richard H. Lindberg;Jari Parkkonen;Björn Arvidsson

  • Predicted critical environmental concentrations for 500 pharmaceuticals.

    Jerker Fick;Richard H. Lindberg;Mats Tysklind;D.G. Joakim Larsson

  • Screening of biocides, metals and antibiotics in Swedish sewage sludge and wastewater.

    Marcus Östman;Richard H. Lindberg;Jerker Fick;Erik Björn

  • Polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls: inclusion in the toxicity equivalency factor concept for dioxin-like compounds.

    Martin van den Berg;Michael S. Denison;Linda S. Birnbaum;Michael J. DeVito

  • Minimal selective concentrations of tetracycline in complex aquatic bacterial biofilms

    Sara V. Lundström;Marcus Östman;Johan Bengtsson-Palme;Carolin Rutgersson

  • Towards better process management in wastewater treatment plants: Process analytics based on SHAP values for tree-based machine learning methods.

    Dong Wang;Sven Thunéll;Ulrika Lindberg;Lili Jiang

  • Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in contaminated soils by Fenton's reagent : A multivariate evaluation of the importance of soil characteristics and PAH properties

    Sofia Jonsson;Ylva Persson;Sofia Frankki;Bert van Bavel

  • Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in the Environment CONTAMINATION OF SURFACE, GROUND, AND DRINKING WATER FROM PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION

    Jerker Fick;Richard H. Lindberg;Chau Phan;Mats Tysklind

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Haglund
Peter Haglund Umeå University
Karin Wiberg
Karin Wiberg Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Jerker Fick
Jerker Fick Umeå University
Christoffer Rappe
Christoffer Rappe Umeå University
Bert van Bavel
Bert van Bavel Norwegian Institute for Water Research
Wei Ouyang
Wei Ouyang Beijing Normal University
Stellan Marklund
Stellan Marklund Umeå University
Terry F. Bidleman
Terry F. Bidleman Umeå University
Chunye Lin
Chunye Lin Beijing Normal University
Agneta Andersson
Agneta Andersson Umeå University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be enhanced with complementary skills and knowledge. For students seeking flexible options, exploring an affordable online general studies degree can provide a broad foundation while maintaining cost-efficiency. This is ideal for those looking to balance education with other commitments.

For individuals interested in a quicker or more accessible educational route, programs listed among the easiest bachelor's degree to get might be appealing. While not directly environmental, these programs can offer practical skills supporting environmental careers.

Specialized degrees such as a geologist degree online are highly relevant for students aiming to work with earth resources and environmental impact assessments. These programs typically emphasize remote learning flexibility without compromising on scientific rigor.

Additionally, expertise in spatial data is crucial for many environmental roles. Pursuing one of the best GIS undergraduate programs enables students to master Geographic Information Systems, a key tool in environmental planning and management.

Best Scientists Citing Mats Tysklind

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles