World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
11268
World Ranking
3901
National Ranking
417

Caroline Meyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Meyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 188 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Caroline Meyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caroline Meyer is affiliated with the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on psychology, with a significant body of work spanning various subfields such as clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including eating disorders and behaviors, mental health treatment and access, workplace health and well-being, the impact of technology on adolescents, digital mental health interventions, sleep and related disorders, and schizophrenia research and treatment.

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Meyer include:

  • Psychosocial factors influencing the eating behaviours of older adults: A systematic review, 2022, Ageing Research Reviews
  • Prediction and diagnosis of depression using machine learning with electronic health records data: a systematic review, 2023, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
  • Managing Minds at Work: Development of a Digital Line Manager Training Program, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Brand narratives: Content and consequences among heritage brands, 2021, Psychology and Marketing
  • Improving university students' mental health using multi-component and single-component sleep interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, Sleep Medicine

Meyer frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Lukasz Walasek, Carla Toro, Guy Daly, Sean Russell, and Talar R. Moukhtarian.

Their research has been published in multiple venues with repeated contributions to the following journals:

  • Asian Journal of Psychiatry
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • PLoS ONE
  • BMJ Open
  • Research Square

Best Publications

  • Compulsive exercise and eating disorders

    Caroline Meyer;Lorin Taranis;Huw Goodwin;Emma Haycraft

  • Eating disorders and quality of life: a review of the literature.

    Paul E. Jenkins;Renee Rienecke Hoste;Caroline Meyer;Jacqueline M. Blissett

  • Psychometric Properties of the Long and Short Versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core Beliefs Among Bulimic and Comparison Women

    Glenn Waller;Caroline Meyer;Vartouhi Ohanian

  • Distress tolerance in the eating disorders.

    Emma Corstorphine;Vicki Mountford;Sophie Tomlinson;Glenn Waller

  • Parental influences on children's eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions.

    Gemma L. Mitchell;Claire Farrow;Emma Haycraft;Caroline Meyer

  • The role of interpersonal functioning in the maintenance of eating psychopathology: A systematic review and testable model

    Jon Arcelus;Michelle Haslam;Claire Farrow;Caroline Meyer

  • Disordered eating and exercise: Development and preliminary validation of the compulsive exercise test (CET)

    Lorin Taranis;Stephen Touyz;Caroline Meyer

  • Maternal and paternal controlling feeding practices with male and female children

    Jacqueline Blissett;Caroline Meyer;Emma Haycraft

  • Cognitive content among bulimic women: The role of core beliefs

    Glenn Waller;Vartouhi Ohanian;Caroline Meyer;Selen Osman

  • Sexual orientation and eating psychopathology: the role of masculinity and femininity.

    Caroline Meyer;Jacqueline Blissett;Claire Oldfield

  • Fear of negative evaluation and the development of eating psychopathology : A longitudinal study among nonclinical women

    Nicola Gilbert;Caroline Meyer

  • Anger and core beliefs in the eating disorders.

    Glenn Waller;Michelle Babbs;Rhonda Milligan;Caroline Meyer

  • Relationships between temperament and eating behaviours in young children

    Emma Haycraft;Claire V. Farrow;Caroline Meyer;Faye Powell

  • Food avoidance in children. The influence of maternal feeding practices and behaviours

    Faye C. Powell;Claire V. Farrow;Caroline Meyer

  • Social anxiety and coping strategies in the eating disorders

    Hendrik Hinrichsen;Fiona Wright;Glenn Waller;Caroline Meyer

  • Positive and negative changes following vicarious exposure to the September 11 terrorist attacks.

    P. Alex Linley;Stephen Joseph;Rachel Cooper;Sophie Harris

  • What cognitive behavioral techniques do therapists report using when delivering cognitive behavioral therapy for the eating disorders

    Glenn Waller;Hannah Stringer;Caroline Meyer

  • Cognitive representations in alcohol and opiate abuse: The role of core beliefs

    Janet Brotchie;Caroline Meyer;Alex Copello;Robert Kidney

  • Social Support and Psychological Well‐Being in Gender Dysphoria: A Comparison of Patients With Matched Controls

    Amanda Davey;Walter P. Bouman;Jon Arcelus;Jon Arcelus;Caroline Meyer

  • Links Between Parenting and Core Beliefs: Preliminary Psychometric Validation of the Young Parenting Inventory

    Alex Sheffield;Glenn Waller;Francesca Emanuelli;James Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

Glenn Waller
Glenn Waller University of Sheffield
Emma Haycraft
Emma Haycraft Loughborough University
Jon Arcelus
Jon Arcelus University of Nottingham
Jacqueline Blissett
Jacqueline Blissett Aston University
Claire V. Farrow
Claire V. Farrow Aston University
Stephen Touyz
Stephen Touyz University of Sydney
Sophia Jowett
Sophia Jowett Loughborough University
Lucy Serpell
Lucy Serpell University College London
Phillipa Hay
Phillipa Hay Western Sydney University
Kathleen M. Pike
Kathleen M. Pike Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up diverse professional opportunities, both through on-campus and online degrees. It's important to understand the different academic paths and specializations available as you consider your future career.

Many students explore clinical psychology masters career options, which may include counseling, research roles, or psychometric testing. However, to become a licensed clinical psychologist, more advanced study is typically required. For further details on this, see degree required to be a clinical psychologist.

Psychology is a broad field, offering numerous paths beyond clinical work. In-demand specialties in psychology include health psychology, sports psychology, forensic psychology, and industrial-organizational psychology, each with unique career prospects and educational requirements.

If you are passionate about working with younger populations, consider growing jobs in child and adolescent psychology. These roles often focus on development, education, mental health, and social challenges faced by children and teens.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Meyer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles