World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
16812
World Ranking
4133
National Ranking
439

Jon Arcelus publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Arcelus sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 174 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jon Arcelus D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jon Arcelus sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jon Arcelus is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychological and social aspects within clinical settings, drawing on expertise from psychology and social sciences.

The main fields of study for Jon Arcelus include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

The subfields of study cover areas such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Applied Psychology
  • Reproductive Medicine

The research topics explored by Jon Arcelus span multiple domains, notably:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies

Frequent co-authors contributing to joint research with Jon Arcelus include:

  • Janet Treasure
  • Ulrike Schmidt
  • Walter Pierre Bouman
  • Sabine Landau
  • Gemma L. Witcomb

The venues where Jon Arcelus has frequently published are:

  • European Eating Disorders Review
  • International Journal of Transgender Health
  • Journal of Eating Disorders
  • BJPsych Open
  • Healthcare

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Jon Arcelus include:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of victimisation and mental health prevalence among LGBTQ+ young people with experiences of self-harm and suicide, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • European Society for Sexual Medicine Position Statement "Assessment and Hormonal Management in Adolescent and Adult Trans People, with Attention for Sexual Function and Satisfaction", 2020, The Journal of Sexual Medicine
  • Long-term effect of gender-affirming hormone treatment on depression and anxiety symptoms in transgender people: A prospective cohort study, 2020, Andrology
  • The quality and satisfaction of romantic relationships in transgender people: A systematic review of the literature, 2020, International Journal of Transgender Health
  • Clinicians' perspectives on supporting individuals with severe anorexia nervosa in specialist eating disorder intensive treatment settings, 2022, Journal of Eating Disorders

Best Publications

  • Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders: A Meta-analysis of 36 Studies

    Jon Arcelus;Alex J Mitchell;Jackie Wales;Søren Nielsen

  • Standards of Care for the Health of Transgender and Gender Diverse People, Version 8

    Unknown

  • Mental health and gender dysphoria: A review of the literature

    Cecilia Dhejne;Roy Van Vlerken;Gunter Heylens;Jon Arcelus

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies in transsexualism

    J. Arcelus;J. Arcelus;W.P. Bouman;W. Van Den Noortgate;L. Claes

  • The role of interpersonal functioning in the maintenance of eating psychopathology: A systematic review and testable model

    Jon Arcelus;Michelle Haslam;Claire Farrow;Caroline Meyer

  • Sport and Transgender People: A Systematic Review of the Literature Relating to Sport Participation and Competitive Sport Policies

    Bethany Alice Jones;Bethany Alice Jones;Jon Arcelus;Walter Pierre Bouman;Emma Haycraft

  • Non-suicidal self-injury and suicidality in trans people: A systematic review of the literature

    Ellen Marshall;Laurence Claes;Walter Pierre Bouman;Gemma L Witcomb

  • Endocrinology of Transgender Medicine.

    Guy T’Sjoen;Jon Arcelus;Louis Gooren;Daniel T. Klink

  • Body dissatisfaction and disordered eating in trans people: A systematic review of the literature

    Bethany Alice Jones;Emma Haycraft;Sarah Murjan;Jon Arcelus

  • Prevalence of Eating Disorders amongst Dancers: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jon Arcelus;Gemma L. Witcomb;Gemma L. Witcomb;Alex Mitchell;Alex Mitchell

  • Mortality Rates in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Other Eating Disorders

    Jon Arcelus;Alex J. Mitchell;Jackie Wales;Søren Nielsen

  • Gender Dysphoria and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature

    Derek Glidden;Walter Pierre Bouman;Bethany A. Jones;Jon Arcelus

  • Transgender and anxiety: a comparative study between transgender people and the general population

    Walter Pierre Bouman;Laurence Claes;Nicky Brewin;John R. Crawford

  • Body Image Dissatisfaction and Eating‐Related Psychopathology in Trans Individuals: A Matched Control Study

    Gemma L. Witcomb;Walter Pierre Bouman;Nicola Brewin;Christina Richards

  • Quality of life of treatment-seeking transgender adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Anna Nobili;Cris Glazebrook;Jon Arcelus

  • Levels of depression in transgender people and its predictors: Results of a large matched control study with transgender people accessing clinical services

    Gemma L. Witcomb;Walter Pierre Bouman;Laurence Claes;Nicola Brewin

  • A comparison of mental health symptomatology and levels of social support in young treatment seeking transgender individuals who identify as binary and non-binary

    Nat Thorne;Gemma L Witcomb;Timo O Nieder;Elena Nixon

  • Prevalence of anxiety symptoms and disorders in the transgender population: A systematic review of the literature.

    Nessa Millet;Julia Longworth;Jon Arcelus

  • Non-Suicidal Self-Injury in Trans People: Associations with Psychological Symptoms, Victimization, Interpersonal Functioning, and Perceived Social Support

    Laurence Claes;Walter Pierre Bouman;Gemma Witcomb;Gemma Witcomb;Megan Thurston;Megan Thurston

  • Social Support and Psychological Well‐Being in Gender Dysphoria: A Comparison of Patients With Matched Controls

    Amanda Davey;Walter P. Bouman;Jon Arcelus;Jon Arcelus;Caroline Meyer

  • Nottingham study of sexuality and ageing (NoSSA II). Attitudes of care staff regarding sexuality and residents: A study in residential and nursing homes

    Walter Pierre Bouman;Jon Arcelus;Susan Mary Benbow

  • Risk Factors for Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among Trans Youth.

    Jon Arcelus;Laurence Claes;Laurence Claes;Gemma L. Witcomb;Ellen Marshall;Ellen Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Caroline Meyer
Caroline Meyer University of Warwick
Fernando Fernández-Aranda
Fernando Fernández-Aranda University of Barcelona
Susana Jiménez-Murcia
Susana Jiménez-Murcia University of Barcelona
Roser Granero
Roser Granero Autonomous University of Barcelona
José M. Menchón
José M. Menchón University of Barcelona
Emma Haycraft
Emma Haycraft Loughborough University
Zaida Agüera
Zaida Agüera University of Barcelona
John F. Morgan
John F. Morgan St George's, University of London
Janet Treasure
Janet Treasure King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to diverse professional paths, especially in social work. Each state sets its own requirements for social workers, so it’s vital to understand the educational benchmarks where you plan to work.

For example, the Virginia minimum degree requirement for social workers includes a Bachelor’s or Master’s degree in social work from an accredited program. In contrast, the Washington minimum degree requirement for social workers allows for some entry-level roles with a Bachelor’s degree, but clinical and advanced positions often require a graduate degree.

Meanwhile, the West Virginia education requirements for social workers emphasize state licensure and specific coursework, while the social worker degree requirements in Wisconsin mandate a degree in social work and completion of a licensing exam.

Choosing an online psychology or social work degree program accredited within your state is crucial. These degrees not only pave the way for licensing but also unlock opportunities in counseling, case management, and mental health services nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Jon Arcelus

Trending Scientists