World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 57 1813 1632 136 127 333 10188

Lisa McKenna publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa McKenna between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa McKenna published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 14.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2024. 25 of the 435 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2024. 1997: 6 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 2 publications
1997 2026

435 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa McKenna: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 6
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 2
2007 3
2008 6
2009 12
2010 19
2011 17
2012 19
2013 23
2014 24
2015 19
2016 18
2017 23
2018 17
2019 22
2020 34
2021 28
2022 33
2023 32
2024 41
2025 23
2026 2
Total 435
Download as CSV

Lisa McKenna publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa McKenna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 324–333 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 333 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81 333
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa McKenna D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa McKenna sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129 57
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Lisa McKenna is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia and has a significant research presence within health professions and medicine, evidenced by 124 publications in health professions and 122 in medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields, including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, emergency medical services, clinical psychology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

Their main research topics cover global health workforce issues, nursing education and management, family and patient care in intensive care units, innovations in medical education, simulation-based education in healthcare, interprofessional education and collaboration, and global maternal and child health.

Lisa McKenna's recent publications include:

  • Entrustable professional activities in entry-level health professional education: A scoping review, 2021, Medical Education
  • Challenges Faced by Female Healthcare Professionals in the Workforce: A Scoping Review, 2020, Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
  • Validating an Instrument for Measuring Newly Graduated Nurses' Adaptation, 2023, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Telemedicine experiences and perspectives of healthcare providers in long-term care: A scoping review, 2021, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
  • A cross-sectional survey of nursing students' patient safety knowledge, 2020, Nurse Education Today

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Lisa McKenna are:

  • Ferry Efendi
  • Sonia Reisenhofer
  • Kolsoom Safari
  • Jenny Davis
  • Monica Peddle

Lisa McKenna's contributions are commonly published in the following venues:

  • Nurse Education Today
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia
  • Clinical Simulation in Nursing
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing

McKenna's work has a focus on areas that intersect healthcare education, workforce challenges, and patient care environments, often addressing issues relevant to nursing students and healthcare professionals. Their research on entrustable professional activities and telemedicine reflects ongoing interests in innovations in medical education and healthcare delivery.

In recognition of their academic contributions, Lisa McKenna was named a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2010.

Best Publications

  • The transitional journey through the graduate year: A focus group study

    Jennifer Margaret Newton;Lisa Gaye McKenna

  • The use of complementary and alternative medicine by pregnant women: a literature review.

    Helen G. Hall;Debra L. Griffiths;Lisa G. McKenna

  • Simulation based learning in midwifery education: a systematic review.

    Simon Cooper;Robyn Cant;Joanne Porter;Fiona Bogossian

  • From Darwin to constructivism: the evolution of grounded theory

    Helen Grace Hall;Debra Lee Griffiths;Lisa Gaye McKenna

  • Midwives’ support for Complementary and Alternative Medicine: A literature review

    Helen G. Hall;Lisa G. McKenna;Debra L. Griffiths

  • Satisfaction of newly graduated nurses enrolled in transition‐to‐practice programmes in their first year of employment: a systematic review

    Karen Lee Missen;Lisa Gaye McKenna;Alison Jane Beauchamp

  • Practice education learning environments: The mismatch between perceived and preferred expectations of undergraduate health science students

    Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Lisa McKenna;Claire Palermo

  • A step ahead: teaching undergraduate students to be peer teachers.

    Lisa McKenna;Jillian French

  • Levels of empathy in undergraduate nursing students.

    Lisa McKenna;Malcolm Boyle;Ted Brown;Brett Williams

  • Turning tapes into text: issues surrounding the transcription of interviews.

    Sally Wellard;Lisa Gaye McKenna

  • Empathy levels among health professional students: a cross-sectional study at two universities in Australia

    Williams B;Brown T;McKenna L;Boyle Mj

  • Registered nurses’ perceptions of new nursing graduates’ clinical competence: A systematic integrative review

    Karen Missen;Lisa McKenna;Alison Beauchamp

  • Adolescent mothers' experiences of the transition to motherhood: An integrative review.

    Erfina Erfina;Erfina Erfina;Erfina Erfina;Widyawati Widyawati;Lisa McKenna;Sonia Reisenhofer

  • Experiences and learning during a graduate nurse program: an examination using a focus group approach

    Lisa Gaye McKenna;Campbell Green

  • Levels of empathy in undergraduate emergency health, nursing, and midwifery students: a longitudinal study

    Brett Williams;Ted Brown;Malcolm Boyle;Lisa McKenna

  • Assessing preregistration nursing students' clinical competence: A systematic review of objective measures

    Robyn Patricia Cant;Lisa Gaye McKenna;Simon John Rankin Cooper

  • Clinical placements and nursing students' career planning: A qualitative exploration

    Lisa Gaye McKenna;Louise Margaret McCall;Natalie Wray

  • Learning style preferences of Australian health science students.

    Maryam Zoghi;Ted Brown;Brett Williams;Louis Roller

  • Perceived knowledge, skills, attitude and contextual factors affecting evidence-based practice among nurse educators, clinical coaches and nurse specialists.

    Gulzar Malik;Lisa Gaye McKenna;Virginia Margaret Plummer

  • An Evidence-Based Checklist for Improving Scoping Review Quality.

    Simon Cooper;Robyn Cant;Michelle Kelly;Tracy Levett-Jones

  • International clinical placements for undergraduate students

    Elizabeth Grant;Lisa G McKenna

  • Nursing's crisis of care: what part does nursing education own?

    Philip Darbyshire;Lisa Gaye McKenna

  • After the graduate year: A phenomenological exploration of how new nurses develop their knowledge and skill over the first 18 months following graduation

    Lisa Gaye McKenna;Jennifer Margaret Newton

Frequent Co-Authors

Brett Williams
Brett Williams Monash University
Ted Brown
Ted Brown Monash University
Richard Gray
Richard Gray University of Oxford
Tracy Levett-Jones
Tracy Levett-Jones University of Technology Sydney
Debra Nestel
Debra Nestel Monash University
Elizabeth Molloy
Elizabeth Molloy University of Melbourne
Shapour Jaberzadeh
Shapour Jaberzadeh Monash University
Brian Clark Jolly
Brian Clark Jolly University of Newcastle Australia
Caroline Gurvich
Caroline Gurvich Monash University
Jan M. Nicholson
Jan M. Nicholson La Trobe University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities? Online degrees offer incredible flexibility, enabling students to balance work, family, and education. Fields such as psychology, marriage and family therapy, and education leadership are especially suited to online study, offering programs that prepare you for counseling, policy work, or academia.

If you're interested in clinical practice, exploring psyd online programs can lead to advanced roles in counseling or psychotherapy. For students seeking to become marriage and family therapists faster, there are accelerated mft programs that condense coursework without sacrificing quality.

Budget-conscious learners will appreciate a range of masters programs in psychology that are both affordable and reputable, opening doors to diverse mental health careers. Those aiming for leadership in education or training might consider the shortest online edd programs to accelerate their advancement into administrative or research-driven roles.

Whatever your interest or current life situation, online degrees provide pathways to fulfilling careers in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa McKenna

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles