World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3683 3397 266 255 236 7237

Amanda Henderson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Amanda Henderson between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Amanda Henderson published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2011. 10 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2011. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Amanda Henderson: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 7
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 3
2004 3
2005 11
2006 16
2007 9
2008 15
2009 10
2010 18
2011 20
2012 9
2013 14
2014 18
2015 19
2016 14
2017 11
2018 10
2019 12
2020 11
2021 8
2022 7
2023 8
2024 11
2025 9
2026 1
Total 284
Download as CSV

Amanda Henderson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Henderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 234–243 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 236 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170 236
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Amanda Henderson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amanda Henderson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Amanda Henderson is affiliated with the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and health professions, with a significant focus on general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, research and theory, education, and physiology.

Their academic work emphasizes a variety of topics including nursing education and management, innovations in medical education, interprofessional education and collaboration, geriatric care and nursing homes, family and patient care in intensive care units, nursing roles and practices, and simulation-based education in healthcare.

Notable recent publications by Amanda Henderson include the following:

  • Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people, 2022, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Measuring the quality of nursing clinical placements and the development of the Placement Evaluation Tool (PET) in a mixed methods co-design project, 2020, BMC Nursing
  • Nursing degree students' clinical placement experiences in Australia: A survey design, 2021, Nurse Education in Practice
  • The Nominal Group Technique: Generating Consensus in Nursing Research, 2020, Journal of Nursing Education
  • Developing a postgraduate professional education framework for emergency nursing: a co-design approach, 2021, BMC Nursing

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Amanda Henderson include:

  • Christine Ossenberg
  • Frederick Graham
  • Simon Cooper
  • Robyn Cant
  • Donna Waters

Their work is regularly published in journals such as:

  • Nurse Education in Practice
  • Nurse Education Today
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing
  • BMC Nursing
  • Collegian Journal of the Royal College of Nursing Australia

Best Publications

  • Nurses' Moral Sensitivity and Hospital Ethical Climate: a Literature Review

    Jessica Schluter;Sarah Winch;Kerri Holzhauser;Amanda Jane Henderson

  • Nursing students' perceptions of learning in practice environments: A review

    Amanda Jane Henderson;Marie Louise Cooke;Debra Creedy;Rachel Michell Walker

  • Students' perception of the psycho-social clinical learning environment: an evaluation of placement models.

    Amanda Jane Henderson;Michelle Twentyman;Alison Heel;Belinda Lloyd

  • The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): Optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curriculum

    Marion Lucy Mitchell;Amanda Henderson;Michele Groves;Megan Bernadette Dalton

  • A study of the impact of discharge information for surgical patients.

    Amanda Jane Henderson;W. Zernike

  • The effect of music on preprocedure anxiety in Hong Kong Chinese day patients.

    David Lee;Amanda Henderson;Amanda Henderson;David Shum

  • An evaluation of preceptors' perceptions of educational preparation and organizational support for their role.

    Amanda Jane Henderson;Robyn Fox;Kristina Malko-Nyhan

  • Creating a therapeutic environment: A non-randomised controlled trial of a quiet time intervention for patients in acute care

    Glenn Gardner;Christine Collins;Sonya Osborne;Amanda Henderson

  • Assisting nurses to facilitate student and new graduate learning in practice settings: what 'support' do nurses at the bedside need?

    Amanda Henderson;Emma Eaton

  • Power and knowledge in nursing practice: the contribution of Foucault.

    Amanda Henderson

  • Creating supportive clinical learning environments: an intervention study

    Amanda Henderson;Michelle Twentyman;Emma Eaton;Debra Creedy

  • Best Practice Guidelines for use of OSCEs: Maximising value for student learning.

    Duncan David Nulty;Marion Lucy Mitchell;Carol Ann Jeffrey;Amanda Jane Henderson

  • 'Caring for' behaviours that indicate to patients that nurses 'care about' them.

    Amanda Jane Henderson;Mary Ann Van Eps;Kate Pearson;Catherine James

  • A framework to develop a clinical learning culture in health facilities: ideas from the literature.

    Amanda Jane Henderson;J. Briggs;S. Schoonbeek;K. Paterson

  • 'What matters to graduates': An evaluation of a structured clinical support program for newly graduated nurses.

    Amanda Henderson;Christine Ossenberg;Scott Tyler

  • Evaluating the effectiveness of two teaching strategies for patients diagnosed with hypertension

    Wendy Zernike;Amanda Henderson

  • Exploring the everyday world of the patient in isolation.

    Deanne Gaskill;Amanda Henderson;Myfanwy Fraser

  • Defining a set of common interprofessional learning competencies for health profession students

    Maree O’Keefe;Amanda Henderson;Rebecca Chick

  • Partner, learn, progress: A conceptual model for continuous clinical education

    Amanda Henderson;Sarah Winch;Alison Heel

  • Facilitating learning in clinical practice: Evaluation of a trial of a supervisor of clinical education role

    Amanda Jane Henderson;Scott Tyler

  • Read, Think, Do!: a method for fitting research evidence into practice.

    Sarah Winch;Amanda Jane Henderson;Debra Creedy

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen Richard Billett
Stephen Richard Billett Griffith University
Elizabeth Beattie
Elizabeth Beattie Queensland University of Technology
David Shum
David Shum Hong Kong Polytechnic University
David J. Anderson
David J. Anderson California Institute of Technology
Rebecca Ryan
Rebecca Ryan Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in the social sciences or humanities today is more accessible than ever, thanks to a wide range of online degree options. For example, pursuing a psychology degree online offers an affordable and flexible path into counseling, research, or organizational roles.

For those interested in social work, choosing from the msw programs that are easier to get into can be an efficient way to earn credentials and start making a difference in communities quickly.

If you’re drawn to advanced clinical practice, there are a number of respected psyd programs available online. These programs prepare graduates for careers as licensed psychologists, often with specializations tailored to personal interests.

Finally, you might consider specializing in family dynamics and therapy by enrolling in marriage and family therapy online programs. These degrees can lead to rewarding roles in counseling and mental health services.

Each of these online pathways can open doors to vital, in-demand careers that help individuals and communities thrive.

Best Scientists Citing Amanda Henderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles