World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
8131
World Ranking
5741
National Ranking
3114

Lisa M. Oakes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Oakes sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lisa M. Oakes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Oakes sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Lisa M. Oakes is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience. Their interdisciplinary work also engages with areas such as computer vision and pattern recognition, education, and automotive engineering.

The scientist's published work addresses a range of topics including child and animal learning development, visual attention and saliency detection, early childhood education and development, spatial cognition and navigation, face recognition and perception, infant development and preterm care, and neural and behavioral psychology studies.

Major publication venues for Lisa M. Oakes include the journal Infancy, where they have contributed eight papers, followed by the Journal of Vision with six publications. Developmental Psychology, Developmental Science, and Frontiers in Psychology each include three of their articles.

Frequent collaborators in their research endeavors include Michaela C. DeBolt, Aaron G. Beckner, Marianella Casasola, Taylor R. Hayes, and John M. Henderson.

Their recent articles include:

  • Diversity and representation in infant research: Barriers and bridges toward a globalized science of infant development (2023, Infancy)
  • Robust data and power in infant research: A case study of the effect of number of infants and number of trials in visual preference procedures (2020, Infancy)
  • Expanded carrier screening for reproductive risk assessment: An evidence-based practice guideline from the National Society of Genetic Counselors (2023, Journal of Genetic Counseling)
  • Early Child Development Outcomes of a Randomized Trial Providing 1 Egg Per Day to Children Age 6 to 15 Months in Malawi (2020, Journal of Nutrition)
  • Developmental changes in natural scene viewing in infancy (2021, Developmental Psychology)

Lisa M. Oakes has contributed to academic literature beyond journal articles, including book publications such as The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development, published by Cambridge University Press in 2020.

In recognition of professional contributions, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2007.

Best Publications

  • Preschoolers' questions and parents' explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity.

    Maureen A. Callanan;Lisa M. Oakes

  • Infant perception of a causal event

    Lisa M. Oakes;Leslie B. Cohen

  • The Development of Visual Short‐Term Memory Capacity in Infants

    Shannon Ross-sheehy;Lisa M. Oakes;Steven J. Luck

  • How infants perceive a simple causal event

    Leslie B. Cohen;Lisa M. Oakes

  • Integrating Language and Gesture in Infancy.

    Elizabeth Bates;Donna Thal;Kimberly Whitesell;Larry Fenson

  • Making Sense of Infant Categorization: Stable Processes and Changing Representations☆☆☆

    Kelly L. Madole;Lisa M. Oakes

  • Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research.

    Lisa M. Oakes

  • Development of Infants' Use of Continuity Cues in Their Perception of Causality.

    Lisa M. Oakes

  • Early Category and Concept Development: Making Sense of the Blooming, Buzzing Confusion

    David H. Rakison;Lisa M. Oakes

  • Infants' object examining: Habituation and categorization ☆ ☆☆

    Lisa M Oakes;Kelly L Madole;Leslie B Cohen

  • A Comparison of Infants' Categorization in Paired and Successive Presentation Familiarization Tasks

    Lisa M. Oakes;Rebecca J. Ribar

  • Language and hand preference in early development

    Elizabeth Bates;Barbara O'Connell;Jyotsna Vaid;Paul Sledge

  • Using Habituation of Looking Time to Assess Mental Processes in Infancy.

    Lisa M. Oakes

  • Developmental changes in infants' attention to function and form-function correlations

    Kelly L Madole;Lisa M Oakes;Leslie B Cohen

  • Examining in Infancy: Does It Reflect Active Processing?.

    Lisa M. Oakes;Donald J. Tellinghuisen

  • By land or by sea: the role of perceptual similarity in infants' categorization of animals.

    Lisa M. Oakes;Deborah J. Coppage;Angela Dingel

  • Rapid Development of Feature Binding in Visual Short-Term Memory

    Lisa M. Oakes;Shannon Ross-Sheehy;Steven J. Luck

  • Advances in Eye Tracking in Infancy Research.

    Lisa M. Oakes

  • Developmental changes in endogenous control of attention: the role of target familiarity on infants' distraction latency.

    Lisa M. Oakes;Kathleen N. Kannass;D. Jill Shaddy

  • The Development of Attention and Its Relations to Language in Infancy and Toddlerhood.

    Kathleen N. Kannass;Lisa M. Oakes

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Luck
Steven J. Luck University of California, Davis
David H. Rakison
David H. Rakison Carnegie Mellon University
Leslie B. Cohen
Leslie B. Cohen The University of Texas at Austin
Elizabeth Bates
Elizabeth Bates University of California, San Diego
Jodie M. Plumert
Jodie M. Plumert University of Iowa
Dima Amso
Dima Amso Columbia University
Bob McMurray
Bob McMurray University of Iowa
Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Vanessa LoBue
Vanessa LoBue Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jyotsna Vaid
Jyotsna Vaid Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens diverse opportunities beyond traditional roles. Many students pursue online degrees in psychology or counseling, which provide flexibility and essential knowledge for future careers in mental health. Online programs often cover core concepts, clinical techniques, and research skills—all vital for professionals working in various settings.

If you're interested in becoming a counselor, it’s important to understand specific state and city requirements. For example, Port St. Lucie mental health counselor education requirements often include a master’s degree and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, mental health counselor requirements in Portland emphasize local licensure and practice standards.

Education and certification steps can vary widely. Aspiring counselors should also review how to become a mental health counselor in Raleigh for local guidance, or learn about how to become a mental health counselor in Reno for Nevada-specific pathways. Researching your desired location’s requirements is key to a successful counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Oakes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles