World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
104
Citations
47101
World Ranking
516
National Ranking
327

Elizabeth Bates publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Bates sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth Bates D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth Bates sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1981 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Elizabeth Bates was affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research focused extensively on social sciences, with particular attention to health, sociology and political science, and gender studies. Their work incorporated a range of subfields including demography and clinical psychology.

The main topics covered in their publications included intimate partner and family violence, sexual assault and victimization studies, sex work and related issues, family dynamics and relationships, child abuse and trauma, intergenerational family dynamics and caregiving, and child welfare and adoption.

Elizabeth Bates contributed to several academic venues throughout their career. Frequent publication venues included:

  • Partner Abuse
  • Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • Social Sciences
  • Epilepsy & Behavior
  • JAMA Network Open

Their recent papers demonstrated a focus on domestic violence, victim support, and the consequences of violence on quality of life. Selected recent publications included:

  • "Barriers to Men's Help Seeking for Intimate Partner Violence," 2021, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "The impact of epilepsy on quality of life: Findings from a European survey," 2023, Epilepsy & Behavior
  • ""I Have Guys Call Me and Say 'I Can't Be the Victim of Domestic Abuse'": Exploring the Experiences of Telephone Support Providers for Male Victims of Domestic Violence and Abuse," 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "But, Who Is the Victim Here? Exploring Judgments Toward Hypothetical Bidirectional Domestic Violence Scenarios," 2020, Journal of Interpersonal Violence
  • "Services for Domestic Violence Victims in the United Kingdom and United States: Where Are We Today?," 2020, Partner Abuse

Collaborative work was notable with frequent co-authors who contributed to the breadth of their research. These collaborators included:

  • Benjamin A. Hine
  • Julie Taylor
  • Nicola Graham-Kevan
  • Eilish Mairi Roy
  • Ching-Yu Huang

Elizabeth Bates' work was recognized in part by an award as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 1981.

Best Publications

  • Variability in Early Communicative Development

    L Fenson;P S Dale;J S Reznick;E Bates

  • The Acquisition of Performatives Prior to Speech.

    Elizabeth Bates

  • The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy

    Elizabeth Bates;Laura Benigni

  • From First Words to Grammar: Individual Differences and Dissociable Mechanisms

    Elizabeth Bates;Inge Bretherton;Lynn S. Snyder;Marjorie Beeghly

  • Voxel-based lesion–symptom mapping

    Elizabeth Bates;Stephen M. Wilson;Ayse Pinar Saygin;Frederic Dick

  • Functionalism and the competition model

    Elizabeth Bates;Brian MacWhinney

  • Competition, variation, and language learning.

    Elizabeth Bates;Brian MacWhinney

  • Language and context: The acquisition of pragmatics

    Elizabeth Bates

  • The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing.

    Brian MacWhinney;Elizabeth Bates

  • Developmental and Stylistic Variation in the Composition of Early Vocabulary.

    Elizabeth Bates;Virginia A. Marchman;Donna Thal;Larry Fenson

  • Continuity in lexical and morphological development: a test of the critical mass hypothesis.

    Virginia A. Marchman;Elizabeth Bates

  • On the Inseparability of Grammar and the Lexicon: Evidence from Acquisition, Aphasia and Real-Time Processing.

    Elizabeth Bates;Judith C. Goodman

  • Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian

    Brian MacWhinney;Elizabeth Bates;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Language, gesture, and the developing brain.

    Elizabeth Bates;Frederic Dick

  • A cross-linguistic study of early lexical development

    Maria Cristina Caselli;Elizabeth Bates;Paola Casadio;Judi Fenson

  • Timed picture naming in seven languages

    Elizabeth Bates;Simona D'Amico;Simona D'Amico;Thomas Jacobsen;Anna Székely

  • A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies

    Anna Szekely;Thomas Jacobsen;Simona D'Amico;Simona D'Amico;Antonella Devescovi

  • The validity of a parent report instrument of child language at twenty months.

    Philip S. Dale;Elizabeth Bates;J. Steven Reznick;Colleen Morisset

  • Point-Light Biological Motion Perception Activates Human Premotor Cortex

    Ayse Pinar Saygin;Stephen M. Wilson;Donald J. Hagler;Elizabeth Bates

  • Functional constraints on sentence processing: a cross-linguistic study.

    Elizabeth Bates;Sandra McNew;Brian MacWhinney;Antonella Devescovi

  • Language and Context

    Elizabeth Bates

  • On the inseparability of grammar and the lexicon: Evidence from acquisition.

    Elizabeth Bates;Judith C. Goodman

  • The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing

    Michael Harrington;Brian MacWhinney;Elizabeth Bates

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University
Beverly Wulfeck
Beverly Wulfeck San Diego State University
Frederic Dick
Frederic Dick Birkbeck, University of London
Nina F. Dronkers
Nina F. Dronkers University of California, Davis
Ayse Pinar Saygin
Ayse Pinar Saygin University of California, San Diego
Donna J. Thal
Donna J. Thal San Diego State University
Inge Bretherton
Inge Bretherton University of Wisconsin–Madison
Virginia A. Marchman
Virginia A. Marchman Stanford University
Ovid J.L. Tzeng
Ovid J.L. Tzeng Academia Sinica
Arturo E. Hernandez
Arturo E. Hernandez University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online degree programs and career pathways beyond traditional clinical roles. One of the most popular alternative careers is social work. Each state has its own requirements for educators and practitioners in the field. For instance, students interested in Alabama social work education requirements can explore state-specific options for licensure and graduate study.

Similarly, becoming a social worker in Alaska comes with its own challenges and opportunities. The process of becoming a social worker in Alaska includes coursework, supervised experience, and examinations tailored to the needs of remote and urban communities.

If you are planning to work in a different state, related paths such as becoming a social worker in Arizona or understanding the requirements to be a social worker in Arkansas are essential to ensuring you meet local professional standards.

Online programs in psychology and social work offer flexibility and accessibility, but it’s vital to stay informed about state-by-state licensure requirements to successfully launch your career of choice.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth Bates