World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2486 2274 272 256 226 16541

Elena Lieven publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Elena Lieven between 1983 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Elena Lieven published across 43 years, from 1983 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2011. 6 of the 265 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1983 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2011. 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication
1983 2025

265 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Elena Lieven: publications per year, 1983 to 2025
Year Publications
1983 1
1984 2
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 2
1993 2
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 4
1998 1
1999 0
2000 2
2001 6
2002 4
2003 6
2004 6
2005 15
2006 11
2007 5
2008 13
2009 17
2010 28
2011 29
2012 9
2013 13
2014 13
2015 11
2016 7
2017 12
2018 9
2019 7
2020 6
2021 8
2022 1
2023 3
2024 5
2025 1
Total 265
Download as CSV

Elena Lieven publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Lieven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 226 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 226
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Elena Lieven D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elena Lieven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Elena Lieven is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, focusing extensively on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, language and linguistics, clinical psychology, and education.

The main topics in Elena Lieven's work include language development and disorders, reading and literacy development, neurobiology of language and bilingualism, stuttering research and treatment, syntax, semantics, linguistic variation, child and animal learning development, and autism spectrum disorder research.

Frequent publication venues for their research are the Journal of Fluency Disorders, Journal of Child Language, First Language, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, and Language and Cognition.

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Elena Lieven include:

  • A Cross-Cultural Analysis of Early Prelinguistic Gesture Development and Its Relationship to Language Development (2020, Child Development)
  • The Role of Animacy in Children's Interpretation of Relative Clauses in English: Evidence From Sentence-Picture Matching and Eye Movements (2020, Cognitive Science)
  • Interactions between givenness and clause order in children's processing of complex sentences (2020, Cognition)
  • Structural and interactional aspects of adverbial sentences in English mother-child interactions: an analysis of two dense corpora (2021, Journal of Child Language)
  • Entrenchment effects in code-mixing: individual differences in German-English bilingual children (2021, Cognitive Linguistics)

Elena Lieven has collaborated frequently with a group of researchers, including Anna Theakston (14 coauthored papers), Max Gattie (6 papers), Karolina Kluk (6 papers), Silke Brandt (5 papers), and Virve-Anneli Vihman (5 papers).

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Elena Lieven was awarded membership to the Academia Europaea in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development*

    Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Gillian Baldwin

  • A Construction Based Analysis of Child Directed Speech.

    Thea Cameron-Faulkner;Elena Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Child language acquisition : contrasting theoretical approaches

    Ben Ambridge;Elena V. M. Lieven

  • The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: an alternative account.

    Anna L. Theakston;Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Caroline F. Rowland

  • Early syntactic creativity: a usage-based approach.

    Elena Lieven;Heike Behrens;Jennifer Speares;Michael Tomasello

  • Crosslinguistic and crosscultural aspects of language addressed to children

    Elena V. M. Lieven

  • Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children.

    Ceri Savage;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Individual differences in early vocabulary development: redefining the referential-expressive distinction

    Elena V. M. Lieven;Julian M. Pine;Helen Dresner Barnes

  • The development of abstract syntax: evidence from structural priming and the lexical boost.

    Caroline F. Rowland;Franklin Chang;Ben Ambridge;Julian M. Pine

  • Two-year-old children's production of multiword utterances: A usage-based analysis

    Elena Lieven;Dorothé Salomo;Michael Tomasello

  • Slot and frame patterns and the development of the determiner category

    Julian M. Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven

  • Towards a lexically specific grammar of children's question constructions

    Ewa Dąbrowska;Elena Lieven

  • Object relatives made easy : A cross-linguistic comparison of the constraints influencing young children's processing of relative clauses.

    Evan Kidd;Silke Brandt;Elena Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Reanalysing rote-learned phrases: individual differences in the transition to multi-word speech.

    Julian N Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven

  • German Children’s Comprehension of Word Order and Case Marking in Causative Sentences

    Miriam Dittmar;Kirsten F. Abbot-Smith;Elena Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Input and first language acquisition: Evaluating the role of frequency

    Elena Lieven

  • Comparing different models of the development of the English verb category

    Julian M. Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven;Caroline F. Rowland

  • The effect of perceptual availability and prior discourse on young children's use of referring expressions.

    Danielle Matthews;Elena Lieven;Anna L. Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • The role of frequency in the acquisition of English word order

    Danielle Matthews;Elena Lieven;Anna Theakston;Michael Tomasello

  • Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech.

    Caroline F. Rowland;Julian M. Pine;Elena V. M. Lieven;Anna L. Theakston

  • Modeling children's early grammatical knowledge.

    Colin Bannard;Elena Lieven;Michael Tomasello

  • Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin

    Jiansheng Guo;Elena Lieven;Nancy Budwig;Susan Ervin-Tripp

  • Child Language Acquisition: List of tables

    Ben Ambridge;Elena V. M. Lieven

  • Bilingual language acquisition: Commentary on Sebastian-Galles

    Elena Lieven

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University
Anna L. Theakston
Anna L. Theakston University of Manchester
Ben Ambridge
Ben Ambridge University of Liverpool
Julian M. Pine
Julian M. Pine University of Liverpool
Caroline F. Rowland
Caroline F. Rowland Radboud University
Balthasar Bickel
Balthasar Bickel University of Zurich
Evan Kidd
Evan Kidd Australian National University
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Stephen C. Levinson
Stephen C. Levinson Radboud University
Simon Garrod
Simon Garrod University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online can be a flexible and cost-effective way to start your journey in this dynamic field. Many universities across the U.S. offer online programs tailored for students seeking affordability and convenience.

For those looking at undergraduate options, the cheapest online psychology bachelor's in St. Louis provides a budget-friendly pathway for students in the Midwest. If you’re in the Southeast, you might be interested in the cheapest online psychology degrees in Georgia, which offer broad specializations with a focus on affordability.

Additionally, Illinois residents can learn about the most affordable online psychology degree programs in Illinois, helping make a quality education accessible. For advanced learners considering graduate study, California boasts affordable online psychology master's degrees in California that can open doors to specialized career roles such as counseling or research.

With these varied online degree pathways, students can prepare for careers in mental health, social services, education, and beyond—wherever their interests in psychology may lead.

Best Scientists Citing Elena Lieven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles