World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2257 2057 250 234 221 20667

Gina Conti-Ramsden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gina Conti-Ramsden between 1980 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gina Conti-Ramsden published across 42 years, from 1980 to 2021, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2013. 7 of the 228 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2013. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications
1980 2021

228 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gina Conti-Ramsden: publications per year, 1980 to 2021
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 4
1987 5
1988 2
1989 3
1990 7
1991 1
1992 3
1993 2
1994 4
1995 3
1996 3
1997 9
1998 4
1999 6
2000 3
2001 6
2002 10
2003 9
2004 2
2005 4
2006 6
2007 11
2008 10
2009 9
2010 10
2011 6
2012 10
2013 12
2014 11
2015 12
2016 6
2017 7
2018 5
2019 11
2020 3
2021 4
Total 228
Download as CSV

Gina Conti-Ramsden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Conti-Ramsden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–230 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 221 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283 221
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Gina Conti-Ramsden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gina Conti-Ramsden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gina Conti-Ramsden is affiliated with the University of Manchester in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, social sciences, and medicine, with significant contributions to developmental and educational psychology, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, education, and linguistics and language.

The main themes of Conti-Ramsden's work involve language development and disorders, infant development and preterm care, child development and digital technology, psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending, child abuse and trauma, down syndrome and intellectual disability research, and early childhood education and development.

Selected recent papers authored by Conti-Ramsden include:

  • Play and prosociality are associated with fewer externalizing problems in children with developmental language disorder: The role of early language and communication environment (2020), International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • Developmental language disorders and risk of recidivism among young offenders (2020), Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • The neural basis of nonword repetition in children with developmental speech or language disorder: An fMRI study (2020), Neuropsychologia
  • Pathways from the early language and communication environment to literacy outcomes at the end of primary school; the roles of language development and social development (2020), Oxford Review of Education
  • The relationship between language difficulties, psychosocial difficulties and speech-language pathology service access in the community (2021), International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders

Frequent co-authors include Umar Toseeb, Jenny L. Gibson, Dianne F. Newbury, Kevin Durkin, and Andrew Pickles.

Conti-Ramsden's research outputs have appeared primarily in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Oxford Review of Education
  • Neuropsychologia

In addition to articles, Conti-Ramsden has contributed to book publications, including the title Children's Language, released in 2021 by Psychology Press eBooks, which has received attention within the academic community.

Best Publications

  • Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology

    Dorothy V.M. Bishop;Margaret J. Snowling;Paul A. Thompson;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Psycholinguistic markers for specific language impairment (SLI).

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Nicola Botting;Brian Faragher

  • Children's language

    Keith E. Nelson;Anne Van Kleeck;Gina Conti-Ramsden;Catherine E. Snow

  • Social difficulties and victimization in children with SLI at 11 years of age.

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Nicola Botting

  • Classification of children with specific language impairment: longitudinal considerations.

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Nicola Botting

  • A longitudinal study of behavioral, emotional and social difficulties in individuals with a history of specific language impairment (SLI)

    Michelle C. St Clair;Andrew Pickles;Kevin Durkin;Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • The Extent to Which Psychometric Tests Differentiate Subgroups of Children With SLI

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Alison Crutchley;Nicola Botting

  • Language, social behavior, and the quality of friendships in adolescents with and without a history of Specific Language Impairment

    Kevin Durkin;Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • Working, declarative and procedural memory in specific language impairment.

    Jarrad A.G. Lum;Gina Conti-Ramsden;Debra Page;Michael T. Ullman

  • Processing and linguistic markers in young children with specific language impairment (SLI).

    Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • A genomewide scan identifies two novel loci involved in specific language impairment

    D. F. Newbury;J. D. Cleak;Y. Ishikawa-Brush;A. J. Marlow

  • Emotional health in adolescents with and without a history of specific language impairment (SLI)

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Nicola Botting

  • Young children's conversations with their mothers and fathers: differences in breakdown and repair.

    Michael Tomasello;Gina Conti-Ramsden;Barbara Ewert

  • Pragmatic Disability in Children

    Michael McTear;Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • Specific language impairment and school outcomes. I: Identifying and explaining variability at the end of compulsory education

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Kevin Durkin;Zoë Simkin;Emma Knox

  • Language Development and Social Interaction in Blind Children

    Miguel Perez-Pereira;Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • Verb use in specific language impairment.

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Melanie Jones

  • Follow-up of children attending infant language units: Outcomes at 11 years of age.

    Gina Conti‐Ramsden;Nicola Botting;Zoë simkin;Emma Knox

  • Non-word repetition and language development in children with specific language impairment (SLI)

    Nicola Botting;Gina Conti-Ramsden

  • The prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders in adolescents with a history of specific language impairment (SLI)

    Gina Conti-Ramsden;Zoë Simkin;Nicola Botting

  • Children's Language, I

    Campbell Leaper;Keith Nelson

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Durkin
Kevin Durkin University of Strathclyde
Nicola Botting
Nicola Botting City, University of London
Andrew Pickles
Andrew Pickles King's College London
Simon E. Fisher
Simon E. Fisher Max Planck Society
Jarrad A. G. Lum
Jarrad A. G. Lum Deakin University
Gillian Baird
Gillian Baird Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Patrick Bolton
Patrick Bolton King's College London
Sheena Reilly
Sheena Reilly Griffith University
Dorothy V. M. Bishop
Dorothy V. M. Bishop University of Oxford
Michael T. Ullman
Michael T. Ullman Georgetown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career pathways, especially in the area of substance abuse counseling. Many aspiring professionals are choosing online degrees for flexibility and convenience, often leading directly to fulfilling careers in this growing field.

If you’re interested in this path, it’s important to understand the local education requirements, as these can vary by state and city. For example, you can learn more about Phoenix substance abuse counselors education requirements and compare those with the steps for how to become a substance abuse counselor in Pittsburgh.

Additionally, requirements can differ in other locations. You can research Plano substance abuse counselors education requirements or discover the specific substance abuse counselor requirements in Port St. Lucie to ensure you meet local licensing standards.

Whichever city you choose, pursuing an online psychology degree gives you the foundational knowledge to navigate different credentialing processes and start making a difference in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Gina Conti-Ramsden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles