World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 52 4999 4637 2742 2483 211 10426

Bob McMurray publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bob McMurray between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bob McMurray published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2025. 75 of the 312 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2025. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 46 publications
2000 2025

312 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bob McMurray: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 4
2004 6
2005 3
2006 5
2007 2
2008 8
2009 11
2010 8
2011 9
2012 11
2013 6
2014 11
2015 18
2016 11
2017 16
2018 16
2019 17
2020 16
2021 20
2022 24
2023 12
2024 29
2025 46
Total 312
Download as CSV

Bob McMurray publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob McMurray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 211 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 211
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bob McMurray D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bob McMurray sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390 52
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bob McMurray is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of psychology and neuroscience, with significant contributions to the understanding of hearing loss, language development, and cognitive processing.

The scientist's main fields of study include Psychology and Neuroscience. Within these, key subfields encompass Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Signal Processing, and Artificial Intelligence.

The topics extensively covered in their work are:

  • Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Speech and Audio Processing

Bob McMurray has published numerous articles, with recent papers including:

  • "The myth of categorical perception," 2022, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • "The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm," 2021, Journal of Memory and Language
  • "Gradient activation of speech categories facilitates listeners' recovery from lexical garden paths, but not perception of speech-in-noise," 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • "How Can Hearing Loss Cause Dementia?," 2020, Neuron
  • "Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations," 2020, Brain and Language

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
  • Language Cognition and Neuroscience
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Ear and Hearing
  • Nature Communications

Collaborations form an important part of their research, with frequent co-authors being:

  • Inyong Choi
  • Timothy D. Griffiths
  • Joel I. Berger
  • Ethan Kutlu
  • Phillip E. Gander

Best Publications

  • Gradient effects of within-category phonetic variation on lexical access.

    Bob McMurray;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • Word learning emerges from the interaction of online referent selection and slow associative learning.

    Bob McMurray;Jessica S. Horst;Larissa K. Samuelson

  • Speaker Variability Augments Phonological Processing in Early Word Learning.

    Gwyneth C. Rost;Bob McMurray

  • What information is necessary for speech categorization? Harnessing variability in the speech signal by integrating cues computed relative to expectations

    Bob McMurray;Allard Jongman

  • Defusing the Childhood Vocabulary Explosion

    Bob McMurray

  • Within-category VOT affects recovery from “lexical” garden-paths: Evidence against phoneme-level inhibition

    Bob McMurray;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • Individual Differences in Online Spoken Word Recognition: Implications for SLI.

    Bob McMurray;Vicki M. Samelson;Sung Hee Lee;J. Bruce Tomblin

  • How Can Hearing Loss Cause Dementia

    Timothy D. Griffiths;Timothy D. Griffiths;Timothy D. Griffiths;Meher Lad;Sukhbinder Kumar;Emma Holmes

  • Cue integration with categories: Weighting acoustic cues in speech using unsupervised learning and distributional statistics.

    Joseph C. Toscano;Bob McMurray

  • Short arms and talking eggs: Why we should no longer abide the nativist-empiricist debate

    John P. Spencer;Mark S. Blumberg;Bob McMurray;Scott R. Robinson

  • Infant directed speech and the development of speech perception: Enhancing development or an unintended consequence?

    Bob McMurray;Kristine A. Kovack-Lesh;Dresden Goodwin;William McEchron

  • Statistical learning of phonetic categories: insights from a computational approach.

    Bob McMurray;Richard N. Aslin;Joseph C. Toscano

  • Longitudinal speech perception and language performance in pediatric cochlear implant users: the effect of age at implantation.

    Camille C Dunn;Elizabeth A Walker;Jacob Oleson;Maura Kenworthy

  • Continuous Perception and Graded Categorization Electrophysiological Evidence for a Linear Relationship Between the Acoustic Signal and Perceptual Encoding of Speech

    Joseph C. Toscano;Bob McMurray;Joel Dennhardt;Joel Dennhardt;Steven J. Luck

  • Finding the signal by adding noise: The role of noncontrastive phonetic variability in early word learning

    Gwyneth C. Rost;Bob McMurray

  • Unmasking the acoustic effects of vowel-to-vowel coarticulation: A statistical modeling approach

    Jennifer Cole;Gary Linebaugh;Cheyenne Munson;Bob McMurray

  • Gradient sensitivity to within-category variation in words and syllables

    Bob McMurray;Richard N. Aslin;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Michael J. Spivey

  • Infants Are Sensitive to Within-Category Variation in Speech Perception.

    Bob McMurray;Richard N. Aslin

  • Rate effects on Swedish VOT : Evidence for phonological overspecification

    Jill Beckman;Pétur Helgason;Bob McMurray;Catherine Ringen

  • Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past

    James S. Magnuson;Bob McMurray;Michael K. Tanenhaus;Richard N. Aslin

  • Anticipatory Eye Movements Reveal Infants' Auditory and Visual Categories

    Bob McMurray;Richard N. Aslin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard N. Aslin
Richard N. Aslin Yale University
J. Bruce Tomblin
J. Bruce Tomblin University of Iowa
Larissa K. Samuelson
Larissa K. Samuelson University of East Anglia
Michael K. Tanenhaus
Michael K. Tanenhaus University of Rochester
Eliot Hazeltine
Eliot Hazeltine University of Iowa
Allard Jongman
Allard Jongman University of Kansas
Timothy D. Griffiths
Timothy D. Griffiths University College London
Mark S. Blumberg
Mark S. Blumberg University of Iowa
James S. Magnuson
James S. Magnuson University of Connecticut
Edward A. Wasserman
Edward A. Wasserman University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree in the USA can offer both flexibility and a wide variety of career options. Many accredited universities now provide accelerated programs designed to help students start their careers faster. For example, you can find some of the fastest online psychology doctorate programs in Virginia as well as fastest online psychology master's programs in Virginia for those aiming to specialize or pursue leadership roles.

Other states also offer quick routes to qualification. The fastest online psychology degree programs in Texas and fastest online psychology programs in Washington are great options for those seeking recognized qualifications on a flexible schedule.

These online pathways can lead to various careers including counseling, clinical psychology, human resources, and educational psychology. Fast-tracked programs help students balance work, life, and study while preparing for state licensure or further academic pursuits. Research each program’s accreditation and requirements to ensure it meets your long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Bob McMurray

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles