World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Edward A. Wasserman

Edward A. Wasserman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 68 2506 2293 1452 1299 334 15019

Edward A. Wasserman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edward A. Wasserman between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edward A. Wasserman published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2010. 9 of the 357 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2010. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 3 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 6 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 3 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1968 2025

357 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edward A. Wasserman: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 3
1971 0
1972 0
1973 2
1974 6
1975 2
1976 1
1977 3
1978 4
1979 3
1980 2
1981 5
1982 3
1983 3
1984 4
1985 3
1986 4
1987 5
1988 4
1989 3
1990 3
1991 3
1992 4
1993 10
1994 4
1995 2
1996 10
1997 5
1998 2
1999 4
2000 6
2001 10
2002 7
2003 4
2004 11
2005 9
2006 8
2007 14
2008 13
2009 8
2010 27
2011 7
2012 19
2013 8
2014 11
2015 10
2016 16
2017 11
2018 6
2019 7
2020 4
2021 16
2022 5
2023 3
2024 3
2025 6
Total 357
Download as CSV

Edward A. Wasserman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward A. Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 331–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 334 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92 334
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Edward A. Wasserman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward A. Wasserman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 68
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Edward A. Wasserman is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and agricultural and biological sciences, with significant work in developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, animal science and zoology, social psychology, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scientist's main topics of research include child and animal learning development, behavioral and psychological studies, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, primate behavior and ecology, animal behavior and reproduction, animal nutrition and physiology, and livestock and poultry management.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Edward A. Wasserman demonstrate an emphasis on category learning and animal cognition. Notable publications include:

  • "Resolving the associative learning paradox by category learning in pigeons" (2023) published in Current Biology
  • "Pigeons exhibit flexibility but not rule formation in dimensional learning, stimulus generalization, and task switching." (2020) published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • "Prelimbic cortex maintains attention to category-relevant information and flexibly updates category representations" (2021) published in Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • "Selective and distributed attention in human and pigeon category learning" (2020) published in Cognition
  • "How do crows and parrots come to spontaneously perceive relations-between-relations?" (2020) published in Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Frequent co-authors of Wasserman include Leyre Castro, Ellen O'Donoghue, Francisca Díaz, Matthew B. Broschard, and Vladimir M. Sloutsky.

Wasserman has contributed multiple articles to a range of journals, with recurrent publications in:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Cognition
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

In addition to journal articles, Edward A. Wasserman has published a book titled As If By Design (2021) through Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Cue Competition in Causality Judgments: The Role of Nonpresentation of Compound Stimulus Elements

    Linda J. Van Hamme;Edward A. Wasserman

  • WHAT'S ELEMENTARY ABOUT ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING?

    Edward A. Wasserman;Ralph R. Miller

  • Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency.

    E. A. Wasserman;S. M. Elek;D. L. Chatlosh;A. G. Baker

  • Comparative cognition : experimental explorations of animal intelligence

    Edward A. Wasserman;Thomas R. Zentall

  • Concept learning in animals.

    Thomas R. Zentall;Edward A. Wasserman;Olga F. Lazareva;Roger K. R. Thompson

  • Pavlovian appetitive contingencies and approach versus withdrawal to conditioned stimuli in pigeons.

    Edward A. Wasserman;Stanley R. Franklin;Eliot Hearst

  • Conceptual Behavior in Pigeons: Categorization of Both Familiar and Novel Examples From Four Classes of Natural and Artificial Stimuli

    R. S. Bhatt;E. A. Wasserman;W. F. Reynolds;K. S. Knauss

  • Assessment of an information integration account of contingency judgment with examination of subjective cell importance and method of information presentation.

    Shu-Fang Kao;Edward A. Wasserman

  • Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories.

    E. A. Wasserman;R. E. Kiedinger;R. S. Bhatt

  • Contributions of specific cell information to judgments of interevent contingency.

    E. A. Wasserman;W. W. Dorner;S. F. Kao

  • Detecting Response-Outcome Relations: Toward an Understanding of the Causal Texture of the Environment

    E.A. Wasserman

  • Comparative Cognition: Beginning the Second Century of the Study of Animal Intelligence

    E. A. Wasserman

  • Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training.

    Michael E. Young;Edward A. Wasserman

  • Perception of causal relations in humans: Factors affecting judgments of response-outcome contingencies under free-operant procedures☆

    Edward A. Wasserman;D. L. Chatlosh;D. J. Neunaber

  • Attribution of Causality to Common and Distinctive Elements of Compound Stimuli

    Edward A. Wasserman

  • Discriminating the relation between relations: the role of entropy in abstract conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio) and humans (Homo sapiens).

    Joël Fagot;Edward A. Wasserman;Michael E. Young

  • Pavlovian conditioning with heat reinforcement produces stimulus-directed pecking in chicks.

    Edward A. Wasserman

  • Backward blocking and recovery from overshadowing in human causal judgement: the role of within-compound associations

    Edward A. Wasserman;Lyndon R. Berglan

  • Temporal factors influencing the pigeon's successive matching-to-sample performance: sample duration, intertrial interval, and retention interval.

    Keith R. Nelson;Edward A. Wasserman

  • Non-Similarity-Based Conceptualization in Pigeons via Secondary or Mediated Generalization

    E.A. Wasserman;C.L. DeVolder;D.J. Coppage

  • The Oxford handbook of comparative cognition

    Thomas R. Zentall;Edward A. Wasserman

Frequent Co-Authors

Irving Biederman
Irving Biederman University of Southern California
Thomas R. Zentall
Thomas R. Zentall University of Kentucky
Ramesh S. Bhatt
Ramesh S. Bhatt University of Kentucky
Joël Fagot
Joël Fagot Aix-Marseille University
Vladimir M. Sloutsky
Vladimir M. Sloutsky The Ohio State University
John H. Freeman
John H. Freeman University of Iowa
Robert G. Cook
Robert G. Cook Tufts University
Philippe G. Schyns
Philippe G. Schyns University of Glasgow
Shaun P. Vecera
Shaun P. Vecera University of Iowa
Frédéric Gosselin
Frédéric Gosselin University of Montreal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a broad range of online degrees and flexible career paths. Many students consider specialized programs in counseling, as these fields offer direct ways to support individuals and communities.

If you're interested in regional options, you can check out the best college counseling programs in Mississippi, which feature strong local networks and state-focused support systems. For those in Tennessee, the best college counseling programs in Nashville combine academic excellence with practical experience in a growing metropolitan area.

Students in the Northeast can explore a wide variety of Northeast counseling degree programs that offer both traditional and online learning opportunities. In New York, you'll find several New York counseling degree programs that cater to future counselors aiming to practice in one of the nation's most dynamic environments.

Whether you plan to study fully online or pursue hybrid degrees, these regionally recognized programs provide a pathway toward licensure and a rewarding career helping others.

Best Scientists Citing Edward A. Wasserman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles