World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Helena Matute

Helena Matute

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4197
World Ranking
9960
National Ranking
122

Helena Matute publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena Matute sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Helena Matute D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helena Matute sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helena Matute is affiliated with the University of Deusto in Spain and conducts research primarily in the field of Psychology. Their work covers several subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and General Decision Sciences.

The scientist's research addresses key topics such as Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Ethics and Social Impacts of AI, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), Mental Health Research Topics, and Behavioral Health and Interventions.

Recent publications by Helena Matute include:

  • "Humans inherit artificial intelligence biases" (2023), published in Scientific Reports
  • "The influence of algorithms on political and dating decisions" (2021), published in PLoS ONE
  • "The impact of AI errors in a human-in-the-loop process" (2024), published in Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
  • "Assessing Emotion and Sensitivity of AI Artwork" (2022), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "I want to believe: Prior beliefs influence judgments about the effectiveness of both alternative and scientific medicine" (2023), published in Judgment and Decision Making

Helena Matute frequently collaborates with a number of researchers. Their most common coauthors include Fernando Blanco, Ujué Agudo, María Manuela Moreno-Fernández, Naroa Martínez, and Aranzazu Vinas.

The scientist's work has appeared repeatedly in notable venues such as Scientific Reports, PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications, and Judgment and Decision Making.

Best Publications

  • Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment

    Ralph R. Miller;Helena Matute

  • Learned Helplessness and Superstitious Behavior as Opposite Effects of Uncontrollable Reinforcement in Humans

    Helena Matute

  • Illusions of causality: How they bias our everyday thinking and how they could be reduced

    Helena Matute;Fernando Blanco;Ion Yarritu;Marcos Díaz-Lago

  • Illusion of Control: Detecting Response-Outcome Independence in Analytic but Not in Naturalistic Conditions:

    Helena Matute

  • Illusions of causality at the heart of pseudoscience.

    Helena Matute;Ion Yarritu;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • Test question modulates cue competition between causes and between effects.

    Helena Matute;Francisco Arcediano;Ralph R. Miller

  • Human Reactions to Uncontrollable Outcomes: Further Evidence for Superstitions Rather than Helplessness:

    Helena Matute

  • Biological Significance as a Determinant of Cue Competition

    James C. Denniston;Ralph R. Miller;Helena Matute

  • Illusion of control: The role of personal involvement.

    Ion Yarritu;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • Making the uncontrollable seem controllable: The role of action in the illusion of control

    Fernando Blanco;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • Flexible use of recent information in causal and predictive judgments.

    Helena Matute;Sonia Vegas;Pieter-Jan De Marez

  • A behavioural preparation for the study of human Pavlovian conditioning.

    Arcediano F;Ortega N;Matute H

  • Blocking of Pavlovian Conditioning in Humans

    Francisco Arcediano;Helena Matute;Ralph R. Miller

  • Predictions and causal estimations are not supported by the same associative structure.

    Miguel A. Vadillo;Helena Matute

  • Stimulus competition in the absence of compound conditioning

    Helena Matute;Oskar Pineño

  • Pathological gamblers are more vulnerable to the illusion of control in a standard associative learning task

    Cristina Orgaz;Ana Estevez;Helena Matute

  • Interactive effects of the probability of the cue and the probability of the outcome on the overestimation of null contingency

    Fernando Blanco;Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo

  • Measuring Software Timing Errors in the Presentation of Visual Stimuli in Cognitive Neuroscience Experiments

    Pablo Garaizar;Miguel A. Vadillo;Diego López-de-Ipiña;Helena Matute

  • Contrasting Predictive and Causal Values of Predictors and of Causes

    Oskar Pineño;James C. Denniston;James C. Denniston;Tom Beckers;Tom Beckers;Helena Matute

  • Illusion of control in Internet users and college students.

    Helena Matute;Miguel A. Vadillo;Sonia Vegas;Fernando Blanco

  • Cues trained apart compete for behavioral control in rats: convergence with the associative interference literature.

    Martha Escobar;Helena Matute;Ralph R. Miller

  • Bidirectional associations

    Mirko Gerolin;Helena Matute

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel A. Vadillo
Miguel A. Vadillo Autonomous University of Madrid
Ralph R. Miller
Ralph R. Miller Binghamton University
Tom Beckers
Tom Beckers KU Leuven
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
Edward A. Wasserman
Edward A. Wasserman University of Iowa
Michael S. Humphreys
Michael S. Humphreys University of Queensland
Ottmar V. Lipp
Ottmar V. Lipp Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a range of rewarding online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students now look for programs that offer a balance between rigorous academics and flexible study formats. For those considering online learning, program rankings can help guide your decision.

For example, if you’re based in Texas or interested in reputable options there, explore the best online counseling programs in Texas. Prospective students in California may prefer programs known for accessible coursework—see the easiest online counseling degree programs ranking in California.

Those looking for flexible studies in other states should consider the easiest online counseling degrees in Florida. If you’re located in a metropolitan area, you might also be interested in the easiest online counseling degrees in Los Angeles.

Exploring these pathways can lead to roles in counseling, mental health services, and various areas of psychology. Online degrees offer convenience while preparing graduates for licensure and professional growth in this dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Helena Matute

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles