World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael R. Waldmann

Michael R. Waldmann

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8239 7692 383 376 120 6832

Michael R. Waldmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Michael R. Waldmann between 1985 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Michael R. Waldmann published across 42 years, from 1985 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2016. 2 of the 139 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2016. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
1985 2026

139 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Michael R. Waldmann: publications per year, 1985 to 2026
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 0
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 0
2005 6
2006 6
2007 4
2008 6
2009 4
2010 11
2011 8
2012 8
2013 6
2014 6
2015 3
2016 12
2017 5
2018 2
2019 3
2020 4
2021 6
2022 9
2023 0
2024 3
2025 1
2026 1
Total 139
Download as CSV

Michael R. Waldmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Waldmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 120
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Michael R. Waldmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. Waldmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Michael R. Waldmann is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on the field of psychology, with particular involvement in various subfields including artificial intelligence, developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main areas of study covered in their work include:

  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Traffic Control and Management

Waldmann's publication record includes papers in prominent venues such as:

  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Notable recent papers authored by Waldmann and collaborators include:

  • "Time and Singular Causation-A Computational Model" (2020), published in Cognitive Science
  • "Secondary Bacterial Pneumonias and Bloodstream Infections in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19" (2021), published in Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • "Towards Real-World Deployment of Reinforcement Learning for Traffic Signal Control" (2021), presented at the 2021 20th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)
  • "How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments" (2022), published in Cognition
  • "How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures" (2021), published in Cognition

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Simon Stephan
  • Neele Engelmann
  • Ronja Demel
  • Annekathrin Schacht
  • Max W. Adelman

Best Publications

  • Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition.

    Michael R. Waldmann;Keith J. Holyoak

  • Causal reasoning in rats.

    Aaron P. Blaisdell;Aaron P. Blaisdell;Aaron P. Blaisdell;Kosuke Sawa;Kosuke Sawa;Kosuke Sawa;Kenneth J. Leising;Kenneth J. Leising;Kenneth J. Leising;Michael R. Waldmann;Michael R. Waldmann;Michael R. Waldmann

  • Competition among causes but not effects in predictive and diagnostic learning.

    Michael R. Waldmann

  • Throwing a Bomb on a Person Versus Throwing a Person on a Bomb Intervention Myopia in Moral Intuitions

    Michael R. Waldmann;Jörn H. Dieterich

  • Causal models and the acquisition of category structure

    Michael R. Waldmann;Keith J. Holyoak;Angela Fratianne

  • Seeing versus doing: two modes of accessing causal knowledge.

    Michael R. Waldmann;York Hagmayer

  • Beyond covariation: Cues to causal structure.

    DA Lagnado;Waldmann;Y Hagmaye;SA Sloman

  • KNOWLEDGE-BASED CAUSAL INDUCTION

    Michael R. Waldmann

  • Predictive versus diagnostic causal learning: evidence from an overshadowing paradigm.

    Michael R. Waldmann

  • Causal reasoning through intervention.

    York Hagmayer;Steven A. Sloman;David A. Lagnado;Michael R. Waldmann

  • Estimating causal strength: the role of structural knowledge and processing effort

    Michael R Waldmann;York Hagmayer

  • Beyond the Information Given Causal Models in Learning and Reasoning

    Michael R. Waldmann;York Hagmayer;Aaron P. Blaisdell

  • How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments.

    York Hagmayer;Michael R. Waldmann

  • Bayesian network models of causal learning

    Michael R. Waldmann;Laura Martignon

  • Intelligenz und Denken : Perspektiven der Hochbegabungsforschung

    Michael Waldmann;Franz E. Weinert

  • Structure induction in diagnostic causal reasoning.

    Björn Meder;Ralf Mayrhofer;Michael R. Waldmann

  • Causal learning in rats and humans: A minimal rational model

    Michael R. Waldmann;Patricia W. Cheng;York Hagmayer;Aaron P. Blaisdell

  • Accessing causal relations in semantic memory

    Daniela B. Fenker;Michael R. Waldmann;Keith J. Holyoak

  • An fMRI study of causal judgments

    Ajay B. Satpute;Daniela B. Fenker;Daniela B. Fenker;Michael R. Waldmann;Golnaz Tabibnia

  • Competence and performance in causal learning.

    Michael R. Waldmann;Jessica M. Walker

  • Combining Versus Analyzing Multiple Causes: How Domain Assumptions and Task Context Affect Integration Rules

    Michael R. Waldmann

  • The Special Status of Actions in Causal Reasoning in Rats

    Kenneth J. Leising;Jared Wong;Michael R. Waldmann;Aaron P. Blaisdell

  • Lying despite telling the truth

    Alex Wiegmann;Jana Samland;Michael R. Waldmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith J. Holyoak
Keith J. Holyoak University of California, Los Angeles
Hannes Rakoczy
Hannes Rakoczy University of Göttingen
Joachim I. Krueger
Joachim I. Krueger Brown University
Ulrike Hahn
Ulrike Hahn Birkbeck, University of London
Stephan Lewandowsky
Stephan Lewandowsky University of Bristol
Alexander Renkl
Alexander Renkl University of Freiburg
Baruch Fischhoff
Baruch Fischhoff Carnegie Mellon University
Irwin P. Levin
Irwin P. Levin University of Iowa
David A. Lagnado
David A. Lagnado University College London
Matthew D. Lieberman
Matthew D. Lieberman University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online learning opportunities and numerous career paths. Many students choose online degrees in psychology or counseling for flexible schedules and the ability to balance other commitments. These programs can lead to roles such as mental health counselors, licensed therapists, or school counselors.

One critical step toward advancing your career is meeting licensure requirements specific to your location. For example, students focusing on how to become a licensed therapist in Glendale must meet both educational and clinical experience standards. Similarly, Greensboro licensed therapist requirements demand rigorous coursework and supervised practice, emphasizing the need for thorough preparation.

If you’re considering Henderson, reviewing the Henderson licensed therapist education requirements will help you plan your academic path efficiently. In Honolulu, the process may differ slightly, so understanding Honolulu licensed therapist education requirements is essential.

Online degrees often align with these requirements, providing coursework and practicum options that prepare you for the licensure process in your chosen state or city. Taking time to review each location’s pathway ensures a smooth transition from education to a professional career in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. Waldmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles