World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
19803
World Ranking
2357
National Ranking
1370

Ralph R. Miller publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph R. Miller sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 378 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Ralph R. Miller D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ralph R. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ralph R. Miller is affiliated with Binghamton University in the United States. Their research focuses predominantly on the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with a specific emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their work extensively covers topics related to Memory and Neural Mechanisms, Memory Processes and Influences, and Child and Animal Learning Development. Additional research interests include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Neural dynamics and brain function, Mental Health Research Topics, and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research.

Ralph R. Miller has contributed to numerous publications, with recent papers including:

  • Failures of memory and the fate of forgotten memories, 2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Testing improves performance as well as assesses learning: A review of the testing effect with implications for models of learning., 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • More frequent, shorter trials enhance acquisition in a training session: There is a free lunch!, 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Adaptive Memory: Generality of the Parent Processing Effect and Effects of Biological Relatedness on Recall, 2020, Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • Retroactive interference: Counterconditioning and extinction with and without biologically significant outcomes., 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition

Their frequent coauthors include Cody W. Polack, James E. Witnauer, Robin A. Murphy, Jérémie Jozefowiez, and Santiago Castiello. These collaborations have appeared in various journals, particularly in:

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie)
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory

Ralph R. Miller's research delves into the interplay of learning mechanisms and memory processes, often investigating the experimental conditions that influence cognitive performance and behavioral outcomes in both humans and animals. Their work contributes to understanding how memory functions and adapts, particularly in laboratory settings designed to explore biological significance and cognitive training regimes.

Best Publications

  • Information processing in animals : memory mechanisms

    Norman E. Spear;Ralph R. Miller

  • Retrograde Amnesia Produced by Electroconvulsive Shock after Reactivation of a Consolidated Memory Trace

    James R. Misanin;Ralph R. Miller;Donald J. Lewis

  • MACHIAVELLIANISM : A SYNTHESIS OF THE EVOLUTIONARY AND PSYCHOLOGICAL LITERATURES

    David Sloan Wilson;David Near;Ralph R. Miller

  • The Comparator Hypothesis: A Response Rule for The Expression of Associations

    Ralph R. Miller;Louis D. Matzel

  • Assessment of the Rescorla-Wagner model.

    Ralph R. Miller;Robert C. Barnet;Nicholas J. Grahame

  • Information processing in animals : conditioned inhibition

    Ralph R. Miller;Norman E. Spear

  • WHAT'S ELEMENTARY ABOUT ASSOCIATIVE LEARNING?

    Edward A. Wasserman;Ralph R. Miller

  • Stimulated recall in therapy using video tape: A case study.

    Norman Kagan;David R. Krathwohl;Ralph Miller

  • Sometimes-competing retrieval (SOCR): a formalization of the comparator hypothesis.

    Steven C. Stout;Ralph R. Miller

  • Amnesia, consolidation, and retrieval.

    Ralph R. Miller;Alan D. Springer

  • Recovery of an overshadowed association achieved by extinction of the overshadowing stimulus.

    Louis D Matzel;Todd R Schachtman;Ralph R Miller

  • The role of cognition in classical and operant conditioning

    Irving Kirsch;Steven Jay Lynn;Michael Vigorito;Ralph R. Miller

  • Information and expression of simultaneous and backward associations: Implications for contiguity theory☆

    Louis D. Matzel;Fran P. Held;Ralph R. Miller

  • Conducting exposure treatment in multiple contexts can prevent relapse

    Lisa M Gunther;James C Denniston;Ralph R Miller

  • Biological significance in forward and backward blocking: Resolution of a discrepancy between animal conditioning and human causal judgment

    Ralph R. Miller;Helena Matute

  • Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

    Hernán I. Savastano;Ralph R. Miller

  • Individual Differences in Machiavellianism as a Mix of Cooperative and Exploitative Strategies

    David Sloan Wilson;David C. Near;Ralph R. Miller

  • Reasoning rats: forward blocking in Pavlovian animal conditioning is sensitive to constraints of causal inference.

    Tom Beckers;Ralph R. Miller;Jan De Houwer;Kouji Urushihara

  • The Role of Time in Elementary Associations

    Ralph R. Miller;Robert C. Barnet

  • Retrieval variability: sources and consequences.

    Ralph R. Miller;Wesley J. Kasprow;Todd R. Schachtman

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis D. Matzel
Louis D. Matzel Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Helena Matute
Helena Matute University of Deusto
Tom Beckers
Tom Beckers KU Leuven
Mohamad El Haj
Mohamad El Haj University of Nantes
Miguel A. Vadillo
Miguel A. Vadillo Autonomous University of Madrid
Norman E. Spear
Norman E. Spear Binghamton University
Thomas H. Brandon
Thomas H. Brandon University of South Florida
Jan De Houwer
Jan De Houwer Ghent University
David J. Drobes
David J. Drobes University of South Florida
Randolph C. Grace
Randolph C. Grace University of Canterbury

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree online opens up a range of flexible options for students at every stage of their careers. Many accredited universities throughout the USA offer online programs designed to fit around busy schedules while still providing a rigorous academic foundation. Students can explore areas such as clinical psychology, counseling, or organizational psychology, preparing for graduate study or direct entry into the workforce.

It's important to consider the reputation and ranking of programs before enrolling. Tools such as the best psychology degree programs ranking in Virginia Beach or the best psychology degree rankings in Waco can help identify top programs in specific locations. If you’re interested in opportunities in the capital, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Washington, D.C. highlights schools with specialized tracks and strong internship connections. For students in the Midwest, check the best psychology degree rankings in Wichita for regional options.

Graduates can pursue roles in mental health services, research, education, or human resources, with many career paths accessible both in-person and online. Start by selecting an online psychology program aligned with your career goals and area of interest.

Best Scientists Citing Ralph R. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles