World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert Colin Honey

Robert Colin Honey

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6112
World Ranking
7972
National Ranking
784

Robert Colin Honey publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Colin Honey sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 146 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Robert Colin Honey D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Colin Honey sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert Colin Honey is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research in neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, radiological and ultrasound technology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

The principal areas of study in their research include:

  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Stress Responses and Cortisol

Recent significant publications by Robert Colin Honey reflect their interest in learning processes, decision-making, and conditioning models. Notable papers include:

  • "HeiDI: A model for Pavlovian learning and performance with reciprocal associations." (2020) published in Psychological Review
  • "Decision Making Within and Outside Standard Operating Procedures: Paradoxical Use of Operational Discretion in Firefighters" (2021) published in Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
  • "Individual differences in the nature of conditioned behavior across a conditioned stimulus: Adaptation and application of a model." (2020) published in Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition
  • "Variation in exploration and exploitation in group decision-making: Evidence from immersive simulations of major incident emergencies" (2021) published in Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management
  • "Higher-order conditioning: A critical review and computational model." (2022) published in Psychological Review

Robert Colin Honey frequently publishes in venues such as the Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition, Psychological Review, Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, and Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.

Their collaborative network includes several coauthors with whom they have multiple joint publications. These frequent collaborators are:

  • Dominic M. Dwyer
  • Adela F. Iliescu
  • Sabrina R. Cohen-Hatton
  • Philip C. Butler
  • Víctor M. Navarro

Robert Colin Honey's research integrates experimental and computational approaches to better understand learning mechanisms and decision-making processes. Their work contributes to the broader understanding of neural mechanisms underlying cognition and behavior, as well as practical applications such as occupational health and safety.

Best Publications

  • Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning.

    Robert Colin Honey;Mark Andrew Good

  • Conditioning and contextual retrieval in hippocampal rats.

    Mark Andrew Good;Robert Colin Honey

  • Contextual effects in conditioning, latent inhibition, and habituation: Associative and retrieval functions of contextual cues

    Geoffrey Hall;Robert Colin Honey

  • Dissociable Effects of Selective Lesions to Hippocampal Subsystems on Exploratory Behavior, Contextual Learning, and Spatial Learning

    Mark Andrew Good;Robert Colin Honey

  • Acquired Equivalence and Distinctiveness of Cues

    Robert Colin Honey;Geoffrey Hall

  • Hippocampal Lesions Disrupt an Associative Mismatch Process

    Robert Colin Honey;Andrew A. Watt;Mark Andrew Good

  • Imprinting, learning and development: from behaviour to brain and back

    Johan J. Bolhuis;Robert C. Honey

  • Context- but not familiarity-dependent forms of object recognition are impaired following excitotoxic hippocampal lesions in rats.

    Mark Andrew Good;Philip Andrew Barnes;Victoria Ann Staal;Anthony McGregor

  • Context-specific conditioning in the conditioned-emotional-response procedure.

    Geoffrey Hall;Robert Colin Honey

  • Context specificity of conditioning in flavor-aversion learning: Extinction and blocking tests

    Charlotte Bonardi;Robert Colin Honey;Geoffrey Hall

  • Simultaneous presentation of similar stimuli produces perceptual learning in human picture processing.

    Matthew Edward Mundy;Robert Colin Honey;Dominic M. Dwyer

  • The role of stimulus comparison in perceptual learning: An investigation with the domestic chick

    Robert Colin Honey;Patrick Bateson;Gabriel Horn

  • Loss of the thalamic nuclei for "head direction" impairs performance on spatial memory tasks in rats.

    L. A. K. Wilton;Alison Lambie Baird;Janice L. Muir;Robert Colin Honey

  • Associative components of recognition memory.

    Robert Colin Honey;Mark Andrew Good

  • Functionally distinct memories for imprinting stimuli: Behavioral and neural dissociations

    R. C. Honey;Gabriel Horn;Patrick Bateson;M. Walpole

  • Retrieval-Mediated Learning Involving Episodes Requires Synaptic Plasticity in the Hippocampus

    Mihaela D. Iordanova;Mark Andrew Good;Robert Colin Honey

  • Acquired Equivalence and Distinctiveness of Cues: II. Neural Manipulations and Their Implications

    Etinne Coutureau;Andrew Simon Killcross;Mark Andrew Good;V. J. Marshall

  • Stimulus generalization as a function of stimulus novelty and familiarity in rats.

    Robert Colin Honey

  • The role of the hippocampus in mnemonic integration and retrieval: complementary evidence from lesion and inactivation studies.

    Mihaela D. Iordanova;Dean J. Burnett;John Patrick Aggleton;Mark Andrew Good

  • Enhanced discriminability and reduced associability following flavor preexposure

    Robert Colin Honey;Geoffrey Hall

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark Andrew Good
Mark Andrew Good Cardiff University
Geoffrey Hall
Geoffrey Hall University of York
John Patrick Aggleton
John Patrick Aggleton Cardiff University
John M. Pearce
John M. Pearce Cardiff University
Patrick Bateson
Patrick Bateson University of Cambridge
J. N. P. Rawlins
J. N. P. Rawlins University of Oxford
Kim S. Graham
Kim S. Graham Cardiff University
Paul E. Downing
Paul E. Downing Bangor University
Johan J. Bolhuis
Johan J. Bolhuis University of Cambridge
Gabriel Horn
Gabriel Horn University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA opens up diverse career pathways, with online degree options making it more accessible than ever. Many students aspire to roles such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a popular credential for those interested in applied behavior analysis and supporting individuals with behavioral challenges.

Online psychology programs frequently offer the foundational coursework needed to move toward BCBA certification. However, requirements can vary based on your location. For instance, if you’re interested in becoming a bcba in Saint Paul, you will need to follow the specific state guidelines around supervision and licensing. Those considering becoming a bcba in San Antonio should pay attention to local internship opportunities and approved coursework.

Cities such as San Diego and San Francisco each have distinct certification paths. If you’re planning to satisfy San Diego bcba requirements or want to know about San Francisco bcba requirements, researching local policies and university partnerships is essential. Ultimately, an online psychology degree provides a flexible foundation for advancing into specialized fields and meeting regional licensure requirements across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Colin Honey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles