World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
17263
World Ranking
4274
National Ranking
1933

Psychology

D-Index
57
Citations
17169
World Ranking
3977
National Ranking
2228

Mark A. Gluck publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Gluck sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 192 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Mark A. Gluck D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Gluck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Gluck is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics addressed in their body of work include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Sleep and Related Disorders
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies

Mark A. Gluck has published extensively in several academic journals, including:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark A. Gluck include:

  • Sleep to remember, sleep to forget: Rapid eye movement sleep can have inverse effects on recall and generalization of fear memories, 2021, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Increased dynamic flexibility in the medial temporal lobe network following an exercise intervention mediates generalization of prior learning, 2020, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
  • Cardio-Dance Exercise to Improve Cognition and Mood in Older African Americans: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study, 2021, Journal of Applied Gerontology
  • A Mini-Review of Strategies for Recruiting Older African Americans to Alzheimer's Disease Research, 2022, Community Health Equity Research & Policy
  • ABCA7 Genotype Moderates the Effect of Aerobic Exercise Intervention on Generalization of Prior Learning in Healthy Older African Americans, 2020, Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Bernadette A. Fausto
  • Miray Budak
  • Zuzanna Osiecka
  • Mustafa Sheikh
  • Steven K. Malin

Best Publications

  • Interactive memory systems in the human brain.

    R. A. Poldrack;J. Clark;E. J. Paré-Blagoev;D. Shohamy

  • From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model.

    Mark A. Gluck;Gordon H. Bower

  • Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia.

    Barbara J. Knowlton;Larry R. Squire;Mark A. Gluck

  • Pictures and names: Making the connection ☆

    Pierre Jolicoeur;Mark A. Gluck;Stephen M. Kosslyn

  • Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory

    Mark A. Gluck;Catherine E. Myers

  • A novelty detection approach to classification

    Nathalie Japkowicz;Catherine Myers;Mark Gluck

  • Information, Uncertainty and the Utility of Categories

    M. Gluck

  • Comparing modes of rule-based classification learning: A replication and extension of Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961)

    Robert M. Nosofsky;Mark A. Gluck;Thomas J. Palmeri;Stephen C. Mckinley

  • Cortico‐striatal contributions to feedback‐based learning: converging data from neuroimaging and neuropsychology

    Daphna Shohamy;C. E. Myers;S. Grossman;J. Sage

  • Reward-learning and the novelty-seeking personality: a between- and within-subjects study of the effects of dopamine agonists on young Parkinson's patients

    Nikoletta Bodi;Szabolcs Keri;Helga Gabriella Nagy;Ahmed A Moustafa

  • Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning

    Mark A Gluck;Gordon H Bower

  • Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning.

    Adam R. Aron;Daphna Shohamy;Jill Clark;Catherine Myers

  • How do people solve the "weather prediction" task?: individual variability in strategies for probabilistic category learning.

    Mark A. Gluck;Daphna Shohamy;Catherine Myers

  • Dopaminergic Drugs Modulate Learning Rates and Perseveration in Parkinson’s Patients in a Dynamic Foraging Task

    Robb B. Rutledge;Stephanie C. Lazzaro;Brian Lau;Catherine E. Myers

  • Explaining Basic Categories: Feature Predictability and Information

    James E. Corter;Mark A. Gluck

  • Intact delay-eyeblink classical conditioning in amnesia.

    John D. E. Gabrieli;Regina McGlinchey-Berroth;Regina McGlinchey-Berroth;Maria C. Carrillo;Mark A. Gluck

  • Basal ganglia and dopamine contributions to probabilistic category learning

    D. Shohamy;C.E. Myers;J. Kalanithi;M.A. Gluck

  • Dissociating Hippocampal versus Basal Ganglia Contributions to Learning and Transfer

    Catherine E. Myers;Daphna Shohamy;Mark A. Gluck;Steven Grossman

  • Modeling the Neural Substrates of Associative Learning and Memory: A Computational Approach

    Mark A. Gluck;Richard F. Thompson

  • Learning and Memory: From Brain to Behavior

    Mark A. Gluck;Eduardo Mercado;Catherine E. Myers

  • Neuroscience and connectionist theory

    Mark A. Gluck;David E. Rumelhart

Frequent Co-Authors

Catherine E. Myers
Catherine E. Myers United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Ahmed A. Moustafa
Ahmed A. Moustafa Bond University
Daphna Shohamy
Daphna Shohamy Columbia University
Szabolcs Kéri
Szabolcs Kéri Budapest University of Technology and Economics
Ramona O. Hopkins
Ramona O. Hopkins Brigham Young University
Martijn Meeter
Martijn Meeter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Michael M. Merzenich
Michael M. Merzenich University of California, San Francisco
Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Richard F. Thompson
Richard F. Thompson University of Southern California
Thomas W. Weickert
Thomas W. Weickert SUNY Upstate Medical University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can help you better understand your options. Many students pursue advanced degrees in counseling, social work, or marriage and family therapy (MFT) to expand their career prospects in the mental health field.

Becoming a licensed therapist, such as a Marriage and Family Therapist, involves several steps—often including a master’s degree, supervised clinical experience, and state certification exams. Requirements can vary significantly by location. For instance, you can learn about Stockton mft certification requirements or see the specific Tampa mft education requirements.

Other cities may have their own unique processes. Reviewing the Toledo mft education requirements and learning about how to become an mft in Tucson can help you plan your academic and professional journey. Exploring these pathways ensures you meet your state’s criteria while aligning your online study with your ultimate career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Gluck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles