World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
7536
World Ranking
5761
National Ranking
275

Martijn Meeter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn Meeter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 189 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Martijn Meeter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn Meeter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martijn Meeter is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans across psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to the fields of education, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental psychology. Their work often intersects with developmental and educational psychology as well as social psychology.

Their publication record includes notable papers such as:

  • Primary school mathematics during the COVID-19 pandemic: No evidence of learning gaps in adaptive practicing results (2021), published in Trends in Neuroscience and Education
  • Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda (2021), published in Educational Psychology Review
  • Congruency and reactivation aid memory integration through reinstatement of prior knowledge (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • How to optimize knowledge construction in the brain (2020), published in npj Science of Learning
  • Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis (2022), published in Journal of Educational Computing Research

Martijn Meeter's frequent coauthors include:

  • Nienke van Atteveldt
  • TuongVan Vu
  • Anne de la Croix
  • Tieme W. P. Janssen
  • Chris van Klaveren

Their work has been published repeatedly in the following venues:

  • Frontiers in Education
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Educational Psychology Review
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Perspectives on Medical Education

Meeter's main research topics focus on:

  • Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Innovative Teaching Methods
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

In their role as a researcher, Meeter investigates how cognitive and social psychological factors influence learning and memory. They explore the neural mechanisms underlying knowledge integration and the effects of motivation and feedback in educational settings, often emphasizing methodological approaches that include online learning environments and adaptive practice systems.

Their interdisciplinary approach combines empirical research from psychology with applied educational practices, contributing to a better understanding of how motivation cycles affect achievement and how peer feedback mechanisms can be optimized both online and offline.

Best Publications

  • A Boost and Bounce theory of temporal attention

    Christian N. L. Olivers;Martijn Meeter

  • Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Martijn Meeter;Jan Theeuwes

  • OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading.

    Joshua Snell;Sam van Leipsig;Jonathan Grainger;Martijn Meeter

  • Short- and long-lasting consequences of novelty, deviance, and surprise on brain and cognition

    J. Schomaker;M. Meeter

  • Consolidation of long-term memory: Evidence and alternatives

    Martijn Meeter;Jaap M. J. Murre

  • Motivation-Achievement Cycles in Learning: a Literature Review and Research Agenda

    Tuong Van Vu;Lucía Magis-Weinberg;Brenda R.J. Jansen;Nienke van Atteveldt

  • Mode shifting between storage and recall based on novelty detection in oscillating hippocampal circuits

    M. Meeter;J.M.J. Murre;L.M. Talamini

  • The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations

    Eren Gunseli;Dirk van Moorselaar;Martijn Meeter;Christian N. L. Olivers

  • On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity driven

    Christian N. L. Olivers;Martijn Meeter

  • A competitive integration model of exogenous and endogenous eye movements

    Martijn Meeter;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Jan Theeuwes

  • Neural Mechanisms Underlying Probabilistic Category Learning in Normal Aging

    Francesco Fera;Thomas W. Weickert;Terry E. Goldberg;Alessandro Tessitore;Alessandro Tessitore

  • Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search

    Martijn Meeter;Christian N. L. Olivers

  • Time-dependent effects of cortisol on the contextualization of emotional memories

    Vanessa A. van Ast;Sandra Cornelisse;Sandra Cornelisse;Martijn Meeter;Marian Joëls;Marian Joëls

  • Factors Influencing Academic Motivation of Ethnic Minority Students: A Review:

    Ulviye Isik;Ulviye Isik;Omaima El Tahir;Martijn Meeter;Martijn W. Heymans

  • The limits of top-down control of visual attention.

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Artem V. Belopolsky;Judith C. Peters;Judith C. Peters;Jasper G. Wijnen

  • Hippocampal structure and function in individuals with bipolar disorder : A systematic review

    Mara Otten;Martijn Meeter

  • Outlines of a multiple trace theory of temporal preparation.

    Sander A. Los;Wouter Kruijne;Martijn Meeter

  • Evidence for simultaneous syntactic processing of multiple words during reading.

    Joshua Snell;Martijn Meeter;Jonathan Grainger

  • The rise and fall of immediate and delayed memory for verbal and visuospatial information from late childhood to late adulthood.

    Jaap M.J. Murre;Steve M.J. Janssen;Romke Rouw;Martijn Meeter

  • Catecholaminergic Regulation of Learning Rate in a Dynamic Environment.

    Marieke Jepma;Peter R. Murphy;Matthew R. Nassar;Mauricio Rangel-Gomez

  • Mode shifting between Storage and Recall based on novelty detection in oscillating hippocampal circuits.

    M. Meeter;L.M. Talamini

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Catherine E. Myers
Catherine E. Myers United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Mark A. Gluck
Mark A. Gluck Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Stefan Van der Stigchel
Stefan Van der Stigchel Utrecht University
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University
Steve M. J. Janssen
Steve M. J. Janssen University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
Thomas W. Weickert
Thomas W. Weickert SUNY Upstate Medical University
Merel Kindt
Merel Kindt University of Amsterdam
Terry E. Goldberg
Terry E. Goldberg Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a psychology degree in the USA, exploring related online programs can open doors to a wide array of career pathways. Many psychology graduates pursue specialized roles such as substance abuse counselors, mental health case managers, or behavioral therapists. Online degrees in psychology, counseling, or social work provide flexibility and are increasingly recognized by employers.

When looking at career options, it’s essential to understand the educational requirements in your target region. For instance, Tucson substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize accredited degrees and state-specific certifications. The process and credentials may differ in other locations, such as substance abuse counselor requirements in Tulsa, which may include supervised clinical experience.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, also review how to become a substance abuse counselor in Virginia Beach or check out the Washington DC substance abuse counselors education requirements. Each city and state may have unique demands, so researching these pathways early can help you make informed decisions about your educational journey and future career.

Best Scientists Citing Martijn Meeter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles