World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
8859
World Ranking
17213
National Ranking
1354

Graham R. Taylor publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 135 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Graham R. Taylor D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graham R. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Graham R. Taylor is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas with a focus on bone and dental protein studies and dental development and anomalies. The main subfields of study associated with their work include rheumatology and molecular biology.

Taylor has contributed to academic literature through papers published in various venues. Their recent publications include:

  • Brewed in the North: A History of Labatt's by Matthew J. Bellamy, 2021, published in Ontario History
  • Mutations in C4orf26, Encoding a Peptide with In Vitro Hydroxyapatite Crystal Nucleation and Growth Activity, Cause Amelogenesis Imperfecta, 2020, published in UNC Libraries

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Taylor reflect interdisciplinary connections and include:

  • David Parry
  • Steven J. Brookes
  • Clare V. Logan
  • James A. Poulter
  • Walid El-Sayed

Publication venues where Taylor's work has appeared more than once include:

  • Ontario History
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • KRAS and BRAF Mutations in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Are Associated With Poor Prognosis but Do Not Preclude Benefit From Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan: Results From the MRC FOCUS Trial

    Susan D. Richman;Matthew T. Seymour;Philip Chambers;Faye Elliott

  • MLPA and MAPH: New techniques for detection of gene deletions

    Loryn N. Sellner;Graham R. Taylor

  • Tissue extraction of DNA and RNA and analysis by the polymerase chain reaction.

    D P Jackson;F A Lewis;G R Taylor;A W Boylston

  • Direct polymerase chain reaction test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in humans and animals.

    S A Ho;J A Hoyle;F A Lewis;A D Secker

  • Prognostic value of p53 overexpression and c-Ki-ras gene mutations in colorectal cancer

    Sandra M. Bell;Sandra M. Bell;Nigel Scott;Nigel Scott;Debra Cross;Debra Cross;Peter Sagar;Peter Sagar

  • A COMMON FOUNDER FOR THE 35DELG GJB2 GENE MUTATION IN CONNEXIN 26 HEARING IMPAIRMENT

    L Van Laer;P Coucke;R F Mueller;G Caethoven

  • Mutations Causing Familial Biparental Hydatidiform Mole Implicate C6orf221 as a Possible Regulator of Genomic Imprinting in the Human Oocyte

    David A. Parry;Clare V. Logan;Bruce E. Hayward;Michael Shires

  • Rapid detection of allele loss in colorectal tumours using microsatellites and fluorescent DNA technology.

    L Cawkwell;SM Bell;FA Lewis;MF Dixon

  • Mutations in NMNAT1 cause Leber congenital amaurosis and identify a new disease pathway for retinal degeneration

    Robert K Koenekoop;Hui Wang;Jacek Majewski;Xia Wang

  • Genomic Deletions in MSH2 or MLH1 Are a Frequent Cause of Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer: Identification of Novel and Recurrent Deletions by MLPA

    C.F. Taylor;R.S. Charlton;J. Burn;E. Sheridan

  • Circulating tumour cells from patients with colorectal cancer have cancer stem cell hallmarks in ex vivo culture

    Fanny Grillet;Elsa Bayet;Elsa Bayet;Elsa Bayet;Olivia Villeronce;Olivia Villeronce;Olivia Villeronce;Luke Zappia

  • Mutation of the Variant α-Tubulin TUBA8 Results in Polymicrogyria with Optic Nerve Hypoplasia

    Mohammad R. Abdollahi;Ewan Morrison;Tamara Sirey;Zoltan Molnar

  • Interactive visual analysis of SNP data for rapid autozygosity mapping in consanguineous families

    Ian M. Carr;Ian M. Carr;Kimberley J. Flintoff;Graham R. Taylor;Alexander F. Markham

  • The detection of large deletions or duplications in genomic DNA.

    J.A.L. Armour;D.E. Barton;D.J. Cockburn;G.R. Taylor

  • Using next-generation sequencing for high resolution multiplex analysis of copy number variation from nanogram quantities of DNA from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens

    Henry M. Wood;Ornella Belvedere;Caroline Conway;Catherine Daly

  • The Exon 13 Duplication in the BRCA1 Gene Is a Founder Mutation Present in Geographically Diverse Populations

    S. Mazoyer;J. Leary;J. Kirk;E. Fleischmann

  • Assessment of the genetic causes of recessive childhood non-syndromic deafness in the UK - implications for genetic testing.

    Tim Hutchin;N. N. Coy;H. Conlon;E. Telford

  • A comparison of fluorescent SSCP and denaturing HPLC for high throughput mutation scanning.

    L.A. Ellis;C.F. Taylor;G.R. Taylor

  • Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of Recurrent Hydatidiform Mole

    Bruce E. Hayward;Michel De Vos;Nargese Talati;M. Reza Abdollahi

  • Genetic analysis of the connexin-26 M34T variant: identification of genotype M34T/M34T segregating with mild-moderate non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss

    Mark J Houseman;Lucy A Ellis;Alistair Pagnamenta;Wei-Li Di

Frequent Co-Authors

Eamonn Sheridan
Eamonn Sheridan University of Leeds
Philip Quirke
Philip Quirke University of Leeds
Alexander F. Markham
Alexander F. Markham St James's University Hospital
David T. Bonthron
David T. Bonthron University of Leeds
Clare V. Logan
Clare V. Logan University of Edinburgh
Colin A. Johnson
Colin A. Johnson University of Leeds
Arleen D. Auerbach
Arleen D. Auerbach Rockefeller University
John Burn
John Burn Newcastle University
Chris F. Inglehearn
Chris F. Inglehearn University of Leeds
Michael F. Dixon
Michael F. Dixon University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often opens the door to a variety of online degrees and specialized career paths in health and life sciences. For those interested in the nutritional side of biology, pursuing an online degree in nutrition can lead to roles in dietetics, wellness consulting, public health, and research. These programs offer flexibility and a science-driven curriculum that aligns with contemporary health needs.

If your focus is on leadership within healthcare, consider advancing with one of the cahme accredited online mha programs. These degrees are tailored for future hospital administrators and health services managers, providing both management skills and industry accreditation.

For those looking toward advanced clinical or management roles, there are also online dnp programs that allow for career progression without requiring traditional clinical hours. Alternatively, aspiring academics and high-level administrators might explore the best online dha programs to gain expertise in healthcare leadership and organizational change.

With these flexible online pathways, students can customize their educational journey and prepare for diverse professions in the evolving health and biology sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Graham R. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles