World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
42872
World Ranking
7311
National Ranking
712

John Burn publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Burn sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 488 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Burn D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Burn sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Burn is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom and has a research profile primarily focused on medicine, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans several subfields, including pathology and forensic medicine, oncology, cancer research, molecular biology, and genetics.

The research topics covered by John Burn emphasize genetic factors in colorectal cancer, cancer genomics and diagnostics, colorectal cancer screening and detection, colorectal cancer treatments and studies, colorectal and anal carcinomas, genomics and rare diseases, and multiple and secondary primary cancers.

John Burn's recent papers include:

  • Whole-genome sequencing of patients with rare diseases in a national health system, 2020, Nature
  • Cancer prevention with aspirin in hereditary colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), 10-year follow-up and registry-based 20-year data in the CAPP2 study: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 2020, The Lancet

Frequent co-authors collaborating with John Burn include:

  • Richard Gallon
  • D. Gareth Evans
  • Toni T. Seppälä
  • Gabriela Möslein
  • Mev Dominguez-Valentin

John Burn has published extensively in a variety of scientific journals. Common publication venues include:

  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • British journal of surgery
  • Cancers

Among the noteworthy topics addressed in their research are the genetic and molecular aspects of colorectal cancer and the development of effective screening and diagnostic protocols. The focus on hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes, particularly Lynch syndrome, has been a critical area, demonstrated by work on long-term aspirin use in cancer prevention and studies on colorectal cancer risk variation within affected families.

John Burn's interdisciplinary approach combines clinical oncology, molecular biology, and genetics to explore cancer development and prevention strategies. Their research contributes to the understanding of complex genetic factors in disease susceptibility and the improvement of patient outcomes through genomic diagnostics and targeted treatments.

Best Publications

  • Celecoxib for the Prevention of Sporadic Colorectal Adenomas

    Monica M. Bertagnolli;Craig J. Eagle;Ann G. Zauber;Mark Redston

  • Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial

    John Burn;Anne Marie Gerdes;Finlay MacRae;Jukka Pekka Mecklin

  • A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project--1981-86. 2. Incidence, case fatality rates and overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage.

    J Bamford;P Sandercock;M Dennis;J Burn

  • Peutz–Jeghers syndrome: a systematic review and recommendations for management

    A. D. Beggs;A. R. Latchford;H. F. A. Vasen;G. Moslein

  • Aspirin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for cancer prevention: an international consensus statement

    Jack Cuzick;Florian Otto;Florian Otto;John A Baron;Powel H Brown

  • Cancer Risk Associated with Germline DNA Mismatch Repair Gene Mutations

    Malcolm G. Dunlop;Susan M. Farrington;Susan M. Farrington;Andrew D. Carothers;Andrew H. Wyllie

  • Revised guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (HNPCC): recommendations by a group of European experts

    Hans F A Vasen;Ignacio Blanco;Katja Aktan-Collan;Jessica P Gopie

  • Identification of the familial cylindromatosis tumour-suppressor gene.

    Graham R. Bignell;William Warren;Sheila Seal;Meiko Takahashi

  • Guidelines for the clinical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)

    H. F. A Vasen;G. Moslein;A. Alonso;S. Aretz

  • Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project.

    John Burn;Martin Dennis;John Bamford;Peter Sandercock

  • Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer)

    Hans F.A. Vasen;Gabriele Möslein;Angel Alonso;Inge Bernstein

  • DiGeorge syndrome: part of CATCH 22.

    D I Wilson;J Burn;P Scambler;J Goodship

  • Mutation in the gene encoding ferritin light polypeptide causes dominant adult-onset basal ganglia disease.

    Andrew R.J. Curtis;Constanze Fey;Christopher M Morris;Laurence A. Bindoff

  • Endoglin, an Ancillary TGFβ Receptor, Is Required for Extraembryonic Angiogenesis and Plays a Key Role in Heart Development

    Helen M. Arthur;Jan Ure;Andrew J.H. Smith;Glenn Renforth

  • Epileptic seizures after a first stroke: the Oxfordshire community stroke project

    John Burn;Martin Dennis;John Bamford;Peter Sandercock

  • Cancer risk and survival in path_MMR carriers by gene and gender up to 75 years of age: a report from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database

    Pål Møller;Toni T Seppälä;Inge Bernstein;Inge Bernstein;Elke Holinski-Feder

  • Cancer incidence and survival in Lynch syndrome patients receiving colonoscopic and gynaecological surveillance: first report from the prospective Lynch syndrome database

    Pal Moller;Toni Seppala;Inge Bernstein;Inge Bernstein;Elke Holinski-Feder

  • Cancer risks by gene, age, and gender in 6350 carriers of pathogenic mismatch repair variants: findings from the Prospective Lynch Syndrome Database

    Mev Dominguez-Valentin;Julian R. Sampson;Toni T. Seppälä;Sanne W. ten Broeke

  • European Code Against Cancer and scientific justification: third version (2003)

    P. Boyle;P. Autier;H. Bartelink;J. Baselga

  • Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer

    John Burn;Anne-Marie Gerdes;Finlay Macrae;Jukka-Pekka Mecklin

Frequent Co-Authors

Judith A. Goodship
Judith A. Goodship Newcastle University
John C. Mathers
John C. Mathers Newcastle University
Hans F. A. Vasen
Hans F. A. Vasen Leiden University
D. Gareth Evans
D. Gareth Evans University of Manchester
Julian Roy Sampson
Julian Roy Sampson Cardiff University
Pål Møller
Pål Møller Oslo University Hospital
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin
Jukka-Pekka Mecklin University of Jyväskylä
Peter J. Scambler
Peter J. Scambler University College London
Annika Lindblom
Annika Lindblom Karolinska Institute
Fiona Lalloo
Fiona Lalloo University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare careers related to medicine, online degree options continue to expand. Flexible pathways make it easier for busy professionals and students to advance their education at their own pace.

Registered nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree may consider rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These options allow working nurses to further their education without additional onsite requirements. For nurses ready to move into advanced practice, the fastest msn to dnp program can accelerate their doctoral journey.

If you are seeking greater flexibility, fully accredited dnp programs online offer distance learning with minimal campus visits, supporting career advancement while balancing other commitments. Those starting their nursing careers may explore lpn programs to quickly enter the workforce with practical nursing skills.

Whether you’re just beginning or seeking to specialize, these online pathways serve diverse career goals—making a medical or healthcare education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing John Burn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles