World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 7053 6631 685 653 421 39824
Genetics 104 646 612 97 93 376 39553

Peter J. Scambler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter J. Scambler between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter J. Scambler published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2009. 6 of the 445 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2009. 1984: 2 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 13 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 17 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 18 publications 1999: 15 publications 2000: 15 publications 2001: 20 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 17 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 22 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 5 publications
1984 2025

445 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter J. Scambler: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 2
1985 7
1986 4
1987 13
1988 2
1989 4
1990 1
1991 6
1992 8
1993 17
1994 12
1995 13
1996 15
1997 17
1998 18
1999 15
2000 15
2001 20
2002 18
2003 17
2004 9
2005 22
2006 12
2007 10
2008 11
2009 23
2010 15
2011 14
2012 12
2013 22
2014 7
2015 14
2016 8
2017 4
2018 11
2019 6
2020 2
2021 4
2022 6
2023 3
2024 1
2025 5
Total 445
Download as CSV

Peter J. Scambler publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Scambler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 375–384 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 376 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46 376
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter J. Scambler D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Scambler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45 104
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Genetics in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Peter J. Scambler is affiliated with University College London in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work spans various subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Key topics addressed in their research include congenital heart defects, genetic and kidney cyst diseases, lymphatic system and disorders, chemokine receptors and signaling, as well as tracheal and airway disorders.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Peter J. Scambler consist of Daniyal J. Jafree, David A. Long, Adrian S. Woolf, Sarah Ivins, and Claire Walsh.

The main publication venues for this scientist include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Cardiovascular Research, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, Angiogenesis, and Kidney International.

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Peter J. Scambler include:

  • Mechanisms and cell lineages in lymphatic vascular development, 2021, Angiogenesis
  • Mutations in CCDC 39 and CCDC 40 are the Major Cause of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia with Axonemal Disorganization and Absent Inner Dynein Arms, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Genetic inactivation of Semaphorin 3C protects mice from acute kidney injury, 2022, Kidney International
  • Dual role for CXCL12 signaling in semilunar valve development, 2021, Cell Reports
  • CHARGE syndrome-associated CHD7 acts at ISL1-regulated enhancers to modulate second heart field gene expression, 2023, Cardiovascular Research

The scientist has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • 22q11.2 deletion syndrome

    Donna M. McDonald-McGinn;Kathleen E. Sullivan;Bruno Marino;Nicole Philip

  • Localization of the gene for familial adenomatous polyposis on chromosome 5.

    W F Bodmer;C J Bailey;J Bodmer;H J Bussey

  • Distinct Factors Control Histone Variant H3.3 Localization at Specific Genomic Regions

    Aaron D. Goldberg;Laura A. Banaszynski;Kyung Min Noh;Peter W. Lewis

  • Spectrum of clinical features associated with interstitial chromosome 22q11 deletions: a European collaborative study.

    A K Ryan;J A Goodship;D I Wilson;N Philip

  • Hyperdynamic Plasticity of Chromatin Proteins in Pluripotent Embryonic Stem Cells

    Eran Meshorer;Dhananjay Yellajoshula;Eric George;Peter J. Scambler

  • Tbx1 haploinsufficiency in the DiGeorge syndrome region causes aortic arch defects in mice

    Elizabeth A. Lindsay;Francesca Vitelli;Hong Su;Masae Morishima

  • TBX1 Is Responsible for Cardiovascular Defects in Velo-Cardio-Facial/DiGeorge Syndrome

    Sandra Merscher;Birgit Funke;Jonathan A. Epstein;Joerg Heyer

  • The gene for familial polyposis coli maps to the long arm of chromosome 5.

    M. Leppert;M. Dobbs;P. Scambler;P. O'Connell

  • Triallelic Inheritance in Bardet-Biedl Syndrome, a Mendelian Recessive Disorder

    Nicholas Katsanis;Stephen J. Ansley;Jose L. Badano;Erica R. Eichers

  • DiGeorge syndrome: part of CATCH 22.

    D I Wilson;J Burn;P Scambler;J Goodship

  • Localization of cystic fibrosis locus to human chromosome 7cen–q22

    Brandon J. Wainwright;Peter J. Scambler;Jorg Schmidtke;Eila A. Watson

  • The 22q11 deletion syndromes

    Peter J. Scambler

  • A new nomenclature for int-1 and related genes: The Wnt gene family

    R Nusse;A Brown;J Papkoff;P Scambler

  • Velo‐cardio‐facial syndrome: A review of 120 patients

    Rosalie Goldberg;Beth Motzkin;Robert Marion;Robert Marion;Peter J. Scambler

  • Velo-cardio-facial syndrome associated with chromosome 22 deletions encompassing the DiGeorge locus

    P.J Scambler;D Kelly;E Lindsay;R Williamson

  • The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease

    Klaudia Walter;Josine L. Min;Jie Huang;Lucy Crooks

  • Frasier Syndrome is Caused by Defective Alternative Splicing of WT1 Leading to an Altered Ratio of WT1 +/−KTS Splice Isoforms

    Barbara Klamt;Ania Koziell;Francis Poulat;Peter Wieacker

  • Molecular Definition of 22q11 Deletions in 151 Velo-Cardio-Facial Syndrome Patients

    C. Carlson;H. Sirotkin;R. Pandita;R. Goldberg;R. Goldberg

  • A candidate for the cystic fibrosis locus isolated by selection for methylation-free islands

    Xavier Estivill;Martin Farrall;Peter J. Scambler;Gillian M. Bell

  • Triallelic inheritance in Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a Mendelian recessive disorder.

    N Katsanis;SJ Ansley;JL Badano;ER Eichers

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Baldini
Antonio Baldini University of Naples Federico II
Hannah M. Mitchison
Hannah M. Mitchison University College London
John Burn
John Burn Newcastle University
Philip L. Beales
Philip L. Beales University College London
Robin M. Winter
Robin M. Winter Northwick Park Hospital
Judith A. Goodship
Judith A. Goodship Newcastle University
Bernice E. Morrow
Bernice E. Morrow Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Adrian S. Woolf
Adrian S. Woolf University of Manchester
Hülya Kayserili
Hülya Kayserili Koç University
Robert Williamson
Robert Williamson University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics opens the door to a variety of dynamic health and science careers. For students who prefer flexible or affordable training, online degrees offer diverse opportunities beyond classic research roles. Many start with foundational credentials such as medical billing and coding online courses to enter healthcare quickly, learning practical skills used in hospitals and clinics.

Others may pursue patient-focused professions, and the easiest nursing programs to get into can provide a fast track into nursing, often with streamlined admission processes. For those interested in the business side of healthcare, comprehensive training options like online healthcare administration programs are available. These programs can prepare graduates for pivotal leadership and management roles within medical organizations.

Affordability is another key issue, and students looking to minimize costs can find high-quality, flexible options among the online healthcare administration programs that balance cost with career advancement. Each of these pathways can complement or enhance a background in genetics, broadening your career prospects in the ever-evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Scambler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles