World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 48 5456 5230 1999 1850 102 10788

Andrés Viña publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrés Viña between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrés Viña published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2016. 9 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2016. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1992 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrés Viña: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 2
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 4
2004 7
2005 8
2006 5
2007 2
2008 5
2009 1
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 11
2014 6
2015 4
2016 19
2017 7
2018 6
2019 7
2020 2
2021 8
2022 4
2023 6
2024 3
2025 6
Total 149
Download as CSV

Andrés Viña publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrés Viña sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492 102
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrés Viña D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrés Viña sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272 48
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrés Viña is affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States and specializes primarily in Environmental Science. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, and Geometry and Topology. The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management; Land Use and Ecosystem Services; Economic and Environmental Valuation; Species Distribution and Climate Change; Remote Sensing in Agriculture; Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement; and Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory.

Viña has contributed to multiple recent academic papers, among them:

  • The hidden risk of using umbrella species as conservation surrogates: A spatio-temporal approach (2020, Biological Conservation)
  • Socioeconomic and environmental effects of soybean production in metacoupled systems (2021, Scientific Reports)
  • A global assessment of the impact of individual protected areas on preventing forest loss (2021, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Evaluating plant photosynthetic traits via absorption coefficient in the photosynthetically active radiation region (2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
  • Foliar absorption coefficient derived from reflectance spectra: A gauge of the efficiency of in situ light-capture by different pigment groups (2020, Journal of Plant Physiology)

The list of frequent co-authors includes Jianguo Liu, Ramón Silva, Emilio F. Morán, Jindong Zhang, and Yue Dou, indicating active collaboration within these research networks.

Viña's publications commonly appear in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), UNC Libraries, The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports, and AMBIO. The presence in these diverse outlets reflects a broad engagement with both preprint repositories and peer-reviewed journals.

Best Publications

  • Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Verónica Ciganda;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Remote estimation of leaf area index and green leaf biomass in maize canopies

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Timothy J. Arkebauer;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Comparison of different vegetation indices for the remote assessment of green leaf area index of crops

    Andrés Viña;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson;Yi Peng

  • Drought Monitoring with NDVI-Based Standardized Vegetation Index

    Albert J. Peters;Elizabeth A. Walter-Shea;Lei Ji;Andrés Viña

  • Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Shashi B. Verma;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity

    Anthony Nguy-Robertson;Anatoly Gitelson;Yi Peng;Andrés Viña

  • Monitoring Maize (Zea mays L.) Phenology with Remote Sensing

    Andrés Viña;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Donald C. Rundquist;Galina P. Keydan

  • New developments in the remote estimation of the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation in crops

    Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Anatoly A. Gitelson

  • Effects of conservation policy on China's forest recovery.

    Andrés Viña;William J. McConnell;Hongbo Yang;Zhenci Xu

  • Mapping understory vegetation using phenological characteristics derived from remotely sensed data

    Mao Ning Tuanmu;Andrés Viña;Scott Bearer;Weihua Xu

  • Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships

    Jianguo Liu;Vanessa Hull;Junyan Luo;Wu Yang

  • Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management

    Vanessa Hull;Weihua Xu;Wei Liu;Shiqiang Zhou

  • Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation

    Neil H. Carter;Andrés Viña;Vanessa Hull;William J. McConnell

  • Climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species and giant pandas in China’s Qinling Mountains

    Mao Ning Tuanmu;Andrés Viña;Julie A. Winkler;Yu Li

  • Using cost-effective targeting to enhance the efficiency of conservation investments in payments for ecosystem services.

    Xiaodong Chen;Frank Lupi;Andrés Viña;Guangming He

  • Reassessing the conservation status of the giant panda using remote sensing.

    Weihua Xu;Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Lingqiao Kong;Stuart L. Pimm

  • Agent-based modeling of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services.

    Xiaodong Chen;Frank Lupi;Li An;Ryan Sheely

  • Synoptic Monitoring of Gross Primary Productivity of Maize Using Landsat Data

    A.A. Gitelson;A. Vina;J.G. Masek;S.B. Verma

  • Effects of grain size and niche breadth on species distribution modeling

    Thomas Connor;Vanessa Hull;Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Ashton Shortridge

  • Satellite change detection analysis of deforestation rates and patterns along the Colombia-Ecuador border.

    Andrés Viña;Fernando R. Echavarria;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Nonlinear effects of group size on collective action and resource outcomes

    Wu Yang;Wei Liu;Andrés Viña;Mao Ning Tuanmu

Frequent Co-Authors

Jianguo Liu
Jianguo Liu Michigan State University
Anatoly A. Gitelson
Anatoly A. Gitelson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Zhiyun Ouyang
Zhiyun Ouyang Chinese Academy of Sciences
Donald C. Rundquist
Donald C. Rundquist University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Weihua Xu
Weihua Xu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Timothy J. Arkebauer
Timothy J. Arkebauer University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Shashi B. Verma
Shashi B. Verma University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Frank Lupi
Frank Lupi Michigan State University
George Burba
George Burba University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Andrew E. Suyker
Andrew E. Suyker University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Programs like the best online bachelors in sociology programs offer valuable insights into human behavior and societal impact—critical for roles in environmental policy and community advocacy.

For advanced practitioners, pursuing a doctorate without the traditional dissertation route can accelerate professional growth. The doctorate degree online no dissertation programs cater to working professionals seeking flexible options to gain expertise and leadership skills.

Educators aiming to transition from teaching to research or higher administration may find the online eds to edd bridge program particularly valuable for advancing their careers without interrupting their professional commitments.

Meanwhile, those interested in social services can consider online dsw programs in social work. These programs complement environmental efforts by addressing community well-being and promoting sustainable social policies.

Best Scientists Citing Andrés Viña

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles