World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
80
Citations
31483
World Ranking
946
National Ranking
409

Shashi B. Verma publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shashi B. Verma sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Shashi B. Verma D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shashi B. Verma sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shashi B. Verma is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States and specializes in engineering, with a particular focus on computational mechanics and aerospace engineering. Their research encompasses computational fluid dynamics, fluid dynamics and turbulent flows, plasma and flow control in aerodynamics, and related aerodynamic processes in jet flows and combustion.

Their recent scholarly output includes papers published in several journals, reflecting ongoing contributions to the study of flow behavior and control mechanisms in aerodynamic contexts. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Shock-Induced Flow Separation in an Overexpanded Supersonic Planar Nozzle" (2020), published in AIAA Journal
  • "Separation and flow unsteadiness control in a compression corner induced interaction using mechanical vortex generators: Effects of vane size and inter-device spacing" (2022), published in Physics of Fluids
  • "Secure Data Transmission in BPEL (Business Process Execution Language)" (2020), published in ADCAIJ ADVANCES IN DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE JOURNAL
  • "Control of flow separation over an axisymmetric flared body using ramped vanes" (2022), published in European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids
  • "Swept Fin-Induced Shock/Boundary-Layer Separation Control Using Corotating Vortex Generators" (2022), published in AIAA Journal

Their research primarily addresses computational and experimental aspects of aerodynamic flows, with emphasis on flow separation and control strategies through mechanisms such as vortex generators. Other core topics include aerodynamic acoustics in jet flows, combustion and detonation processes, and environmental studies related to wind and airflow.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include:

  • C. Manisankar
  • T. Nilavarasan
  • Ganapati N. Joshi
  • Ajay Misra
  • Boubakr Zebiri

Shashi B. Verma's research is regularly featured in journals with recurring appearances in:

  • AIAA Journal
  • Physics of Fluids
  • European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids
  • Shock Waves
  • Journal of Visualization

Their work is firmly situated within engineering disciplines, focusing extensively on computational mechanics with cross-disciplinary links to information systems, particularly in the context of secure data transmission protocols in business process execution languages.

Best Publications

  • FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities

    Dennis Baldocchi;Eva Falge;Lianhong Gu;Richard Olson

  • Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites

    Kell Wilson;Allen Goldstein;Eva Falge;Marc Aubinet

  • Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange

    E. Falge;D. Baldocchi;R. Olson;P. Anthoni

  • Microclimate: the biological environment

    Norman J. Rosenberg;Blaine L. Blad;Shashi B. Verma

  • Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation

    B.E Law;E Falge;L Gu;D.D Baldocchi

  • Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity

    Lianhong Gu;Dennis Baldocchi;Shashi B. Verma;T. A. Black

  • Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets

    Eva Falge;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Richard Olson;Peter Anthoni

  • Global estimates of evapotranspiration and gross primary production based on MODIS and global meteorology data

    Wenping Yuan;Shuguang Liu;Shuguang Liu;Guirui Yu;Jean Marc Bonnefond

  • Annual carbon dioxide exchange in irrigated and rainfed maize-based agroecosystems

    Shashi B. Verma;Achim Dobermann;Kenneth G. Cassman;Daniel T. Walters

  • A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes

    Andrew D. Richardson;Andrew D. Richardson;David Y. Hollinger;George G. Burba;Kenneth J. Davis

  • Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Shashi B. Verma;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Year‐round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie

    Andrew E. Suyker;Shashi B. Verma

  • A Two-Step Filtering approach for detecting maize and soybean phenology with time-series MODIS data

    Toshihiro Sakamoto;Brian D. Wardlow;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Shashi B. Verma

  • Eddy fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and sensible heat over a deciduous forest

    Shashi B. Verma;Shashi B. Verma;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Dean E. Anderson;Dean E. Anderson;Detlef R. Matt;Detlef R. Matt

  • Objective threshold determination for nighttime eddy flux filtering

    Lianhong Gu;Eva M. Falge;Tom Boden;Dennis D. Baldocchi

  • Estimation of Net Ecosystem Carbon Exchange for the Conterminous United States by Combining MODIS and AmeriFlux Data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Beverly E. Law

  • A model‐data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Christopher R. Schwalm;Christopher A. Williams;Kevin Schaefer;Ryan S. Anderson

  • Diurnal centroid of ecosystem energy and carbon fluxes at FLUXNET sites.

    Kell Wilson;Dennis Baldocchi;Eva Falge;Marc Aubinet

  • A continuous measure of gross primary production for the conterminous United States derived from MODIS and AmeriFlux data

    Jingfeng Xiao;Qianlai Zhuang;Beverly E. Law;Jiquan Chen

  • Energy partitioning between latent and sensible heat flux during the warm season at FLUXNET sites

    Kell B. Wilson;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Marc Aubinet;Paul Berbigier

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew E. Suyker
Andrew E. Suyker University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Dennis D. Baldocchi
Dennis D. Baldocchi University of California, Berkeley
Joon Kim
Joon Kim Seoul National University
George Burba
George Burba University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Timothy J. Arkebauer
Timothy J. Arkebauer University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Tilden P. Meyers
Tilden P. Meyers National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Anatoly A. Gitelson
Anatoly A. Gitelson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
Timo Vesala
Timo Vesala University of Helsinki
Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in earth processes and natural resources, a geology degree online offers a focused study on the solid Earth, combining fieldwork with modern analytics.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental studies by enabling spatial data analysis and decision-making. Students seeking expertise in this area can explore top programs through the gis degree to work with cutting-edge technologies in mapping and environmental modeling.

Environmental policy and administration are essential for driving change, and professionals often pursue an advanced degree like the best online mpa to gain leadership skills in public affairs and sustainable management.

Understanding human-social dynamics is equally important. An accredited online bachelors in sociology equips students to analyze how societies interact with their environments, supporting community-based sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Shashi B. Verma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles