World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
89
Citations
45478
World Ranking
603
National Ranking
270

Tilden P. Meyers publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilden P. Meyers sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 226 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Tilden P. Meyers D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilden P. Meyers sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tilden P. Meyers is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research work spans multiple areas within environmental and earth sciences, focusing extensively on atmospheric and planetary processes as well as environmental science applications.

The main fields of study for Meyers include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, Meyers has contributed to several subfields, including:

  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Atmospheric Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Ecology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Their research topics are diverse, covering key environmental and meteorological phenomena such as:

  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate Variability and Models
  • Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing

Meyers has published several recent papers in prominent journals and conferences, including:

  • Interoperability of ECOSTRESS and Landsat for mapping evapotranspiration time series at sub-field scales, 2020, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Connecting Land-Atmosphere Interactions to Surface Heterogeneity in CHEESEHEAD19, 2020, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • How Well Are We Measuring Snow Post-SPICE?, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Intercomparison of In Situ Sensors for Ground-Based Land Surface Temperature Measurements, 2020, Sensors

The frequent co-authors in Meyers' publications include:

  • Temple R. Lee
  • P. Krishnan
  • John Kochendorfer
  • Brian Butterworth
  • Mark Heuer

Meyers has contributed publications to specific venues multiple times, indicating a consistent research output in these outlets:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Vadose Zone Journal
  • Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology

Best Publications

  • FLUXNET: A New Tool to Study the Temporal and Spatial Variability of Ecosystem-Scale Carbon Dioxide, Water Vapor, and Energy Flux Densities

    Dennis Baldocchi;Eva Falge;Lianhong Gu;Richard Olson

  • On the Separation of Net Ecosystem Exchange into Assimilation and Ecosystem Respiration: Review and Improved Algorithm

    Markus Reichstein;Eva Falge;Dennis Baldocchi;Dario Papale

  • Energy balance closure at FLUXNET sites

    Kell Wilson;Allen Goldstein;Eva Falge;Marc Aubinet

  • Gap filling strategies for defensible annual sums of net ecosystem exchange

    E. Falge;D. Baldocchi;R. Olson;P. Anthoni

  • Correcting eddy-covariance flux underestimates over a grassland

    Tracy E Twine;W. P. Kustas;J. M. Norman;D. R. Cook

  • Measuring Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchanges of Biologically Related Gases with Micrometeorological Methods

    Dennis D. Baldocchi;Bruce B. Hincks;Tilden P. Meyers

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation

    B.E Law;E Falge;L Gu;D.D Baldocchi

  • Seasonality of ecosystem respiration and gross primary production as derived from FLUXNET measurements

    Eva Falge;Dennis Baldocchi;John Tenhunen;Marc Aubinet

  • A preliminary multiple resistance routine for deriving dry deposition velocities from measured quantities

    B. B. Hicks;D. D. Baldocchi;T. P. Meyers;R. P. Hosker

  • Gap filling strategies for long term energy flux data sets

    Eva Falge;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Richard Olson;Peter Anthoni

  • The 2007 Eastern US Spring Freeze: Increased Cold Damage in a Warming World

    Lianhong Gu;Paul J. Hanson;W. Mac Post;Dale P. Kaiser

  • Observed increase in local cooling effect of deforestation at higher latitudes

    Xuhui Lee;Michael L. Goulden;David Y. Hollinger;Alan Barr

  • How Well Are We Measuring Snow: The NOAA/FAA/NCAR Winter Precipitation Test Bed

    Roy Rasmussen;Bruce Baker;John Kochendorfer;Tilden Meyers

  • Averaging, Detrending, and Filtering of Eddy Covariance Time Series

    John Moncrieff;Robert Clement;John Finnigan;Tilden Meyers

  • On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective

    Dennis Baldocchi;Tilden Meyers

  • Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes.

    Kyaw Tha Paw U;Dennis D. Baldocchi;Tilden P. Meyers;Kell B. Wilson

  • An assessment of storage terms in the surface energy balance of maize and soybean

    Tilden P. Meyers;Steven E. Hollinger

  • U.S. Climate Reference Network after One Decade of Operations: Status and Assessment

    Howard J. Diamond;Thomas R. Karl;Michael A. Palecki;C. Bruce Baker

  • A cross-biome comparison of daily light use efficiency for gross primary production

    David P. Turner;Shawn Urbanski;Dale Bremer;Steven C. Wofsy

Frequent Co-Authors

Dennis D. Baldocchi
Dennis D. Baldocchi University of California, Berkeley
Shashi B. Verma
Shashi B. Verma University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Walter C. Oechel
Walter C. Oechel San Diego State University
Russell K. Monson
Russell K. Monson University of Colorado Boulder
Lianhong Gu
Lianhong Gu Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Andrew E. Suyker
Andrew E. Suyker University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Beverly E. Law
Beverly E. Law Oregon State University
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
Carl J. Bernacchi
Carl J. Bernacchi University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which intersect with technology, policy, and social sciences. For example, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental data analysis and spatial planning. Pursuing one of the best gis graduate programs equips students with skills in mapping and data visualization essential for environmental management and research.

Environmental issues often require effective governance and policy-making. This is where public administration degrees become valuable. Many professionals enhance their expertise through the best online masters in public administration, preparing them to influence and implement sustainability policies at various governmental and organizational levels.

Understanding human behavior and societies is key when addressing environmental challenges. This makes social sciences degrees highly relevant. The best online sociology bachelor degree programs provide foundational knowledge about social dynamics, helping environmental scientists engage with community-based sustainability initiatives more effectively.

For educators aiming to advance environmental education without the extensive research commitment, the best online edd programs without dissertation requirement offer a flexible path. These programs focus on leadership and applied skills, allowing professionals to impact environmental learning and advocacy in academic and community settings.

Best Scientists Citing Tilden P. Meyers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles