World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 43 6951 6680 2473 2299 84 10973

Sanford Sillman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sanford Sillman between 1979 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sanford Sillman published across 41 years, from 1979 to 2019, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2002. 1 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2002. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 6 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1979 2019

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sanford Sillman: publications per year, 1979 to 2019
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 4
1981 3
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 6
1994 2
1995 6
1996 3
1997 4
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 5
2002 7
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 1
2009 6
2010 2
2011 2
2012 2
2013 1
2014 6
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 87
Download as CSV

Sanford Sillman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanford Sillman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 84
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Sanford Sillman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanford Sillman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336 43
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Sanford Sillman is affiliated with the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research conducted within this institution.

No specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields of study have been listed for Sanford Sillman. As such, the profile does not include those elements.

The absence of listed main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work implies that available public data does not specify the exact areas of research or thematic focus for this scientist at this time.

There are also no recorded awards or recognitions associated with Sanford Sillman based on the current data.

The scientist is currently alive, with no indication of passing.

Best Publications

  • The relation between ozone, NOx and hydrocarbons in urban and polluted rural environments

    Sanford Sillman

  • The use of NO y , H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone‐NO x ‐hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations

    Sanford Sillman

  • The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes

    Sanford Sillman;Jennifer A. Logan;Steven C. Wofsy

  • Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NOx and VOC controls on surface ozone formation

    Bryan N. Duncan;Yasuko Yoshida;Yasuko Yoshida;Jennifer R. Olson;Sanford Sillman

  • Impact of temperature on oxidant photochemistry in urban, polluted rural and remote environments

    Sanford Sillman;Perry J. Samson

  • The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models

    K. Tsigaridis;K. Tsigaridis;N. Daskalakis;N. Daskalakis;M. Kanakidou;P. J. Adams

  • Formation of C7F15COOH (PFOA) and other perfluorocarboxylic acids during the atmospheric oxidation of 8:2 fluorotelomer alcohol.

    T. J. Wallington;M. D. Hurley;J. Xia;Donald J Wuebbles

  • Some theoretical results concerning O3-NOx-VOC chemistry and NOx-VOC indicators

    Sanford Sillman;Dongyang He

  • Factors regulating ozone over the United States and its export to the global atmosphere

    Daniel James Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan;Geraldine M. Gardner;Rose M. Yevich

  • Radiative forcing of organic aerosol in the atmosphere and on snow: Effects of SOA and brown carbon

    Guangxing Lin;Joyce E. Penner;Mark G. Flanner;Sanford Sillman

  • Total reactive nitrogen (NO y ) as an indicator of the sensitivity of ozone to reductions in hydrocarbon and NO x emissions

    Jana B. Milford;Dongfen Gao;Sanford Sillman;Peter Blossey

  • A regional scale model for ozone in the United States with subgrid representation of urban and power plant plumes

    Sanford Sillman;Jennifer A. Logan;Steven C. Wofsy

  • Observed suppression of ozone formation at extremely high temperatures due to chemical and biophysical feedbacks

    Allison L. Steiner;Adam J. Davis;Sanford Sillman;Robert C. Owen

  • Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere

    Lawrence I. Kleinman;Peter H. Daum;Jai H. Lee;Yin-Nan Lee

  • Simulation of summertime ozone over North America

    Daniel James Jacob;Jennifer A. Logan;Rose M. Yevich;Geraldine M. Gardner

  • The Use of Photochemical Indicators to Evaluate Ozone-NOx-Hydrocarbon Sensitivity: Case Studies from Atlanta, New York, and Los Angeles.

    Sanford Sillman;Dongyang He;Carlos Cardelino;Robert E. Imhoff

  • Nighttime observations of anomalously high levels of hydroxyl radicals above a deciduous forest canopy

    Ian Faloona;Ian Faloona;Dave Tan;Dave Tan;William Brune;Julia Hurst

  • Climatologies of NOx and NOy: A comparison of data and models

    L.K. Emmons;M.A. Carroll;D.A. Hauglustaine;G.P. Brasseur

  • Model correlations for ozone, reactive nitrogen, and peroxides for Nashville in comparison with measurements : Implications for O3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry

    Sanford Sillman;Dongyang He;Margaret R. Pippin;Peter H. Daum

  • Effects of additional nonmethane volatile organic compounds, organic nitrates, and direct emissions of oxygenated organic species on global tropospheric chemistry

    Akinori Ito;Akinori Ito;Sanford Sillman;Joyce E. Penner

  • O3‐NOx‐VOC sensitivity and NOx‐VOC indicators in Paris: Results from models and Atmospheric Pollution Over the Paris Area (ESQUIF) measurements

    Sanford Sillman;Robert Vautard;Laurent Menut;Dieter Kley

Frequent Co-Authors

Joyce E. Penner
Joyce E. Penner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Mary Anne Carroll
Mary Anne Carroll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Jennifer A. Logan
Jennifer A. Logan Harvard University
Steven C. Wofsy
Steven C. Wofsy Harvard University
Gerald J. Keeler
Gerald J. Keeler University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Troy Thornberry
Troy Thornberry National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Daniel J. Jacob
Daniel J. Jacob Harvard University
Hal Westberg
Hal Westberg Washington State University
Lawrence I. Kleinman
Lawrence I. Kleinman Brookhaven National Laboratory
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their knowledge beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degree programs offer flexible options tailored to different career goals. Educators looking to move into higher academic roles might consider an online eds to edd bridge program, which provides a streamlined path from a master's to a doctoral degree in education.

Social workers focusing on environmental and community health issues can enhance their expertise through affordable and accessible options like dsw online programs. This helps professionals influence policy and advocacy efforts grounded in environmental justice.

Many students begin their academic journey by identifying an accredited affordable online general studies degree as a versatile first step before specializing. This approach allows learners to explore multiple disciplines, including environmental issues, at a reduced cost.

For those seeking a straightforward path to entering the field, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can help guide decisions. While no degree related to Environmental Sciences is necessarily "easy," some programs offer more flexibility and less intensive coursework, making online study more manageable for busy professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Sanford Sillman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles