World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
8685
World Ranking
3737
National Ranking
1423

Lawrence I. Kleinman publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence I. Kleinman sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 124 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Lawrence I. Kleinman D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence I. Kleinman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence I. Kleinman is affiliated with Brookhaven National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with substantial contributions to the study of atmospheric chemistry and aerosols.

The scientist's work covers multiple subfields, including global and planetary change, atmospheric science, and intersects occasionally with health, toxicology, mutagenesis, genetics, and dermatology. The main topics of their research encompass atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, air quality and health impacts, diabetes and associated disorders, and dermatological and COVID-19 studies.

Frequent publication venues for Kleinman's research include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Environmental Science & Technology
  • Remote Sensing
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • ACS ES&T Air

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Rapid evolution of aerosol particles and their optical properties downwind of wildfires in the western US, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Using the Black Carbon Particle Mixing State to Characterize the Lifecycle of Biomass Burning Aerosols, 2022, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Wildfire Smoke Particle Properties and Evolution, from Space-Based Multi-Angle Imaging, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Dilution impacts on smoke aging: evidence in Biomass Burning Observation Project (BBOP) data, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Fine Ash-Bearing Particles as a Major Aerosol Component in Biomass Burning Smoke, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Lawrence I. Kleinman has collaborated frequently with other researchers including Arthur J. Sedlacek, T. B. Onasch, John E. Shilling, Jian Wang, and Kouji Adachi. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications in the atmospheric and environmental sciences domain.

Best Publications

  • Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: Potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation

    Alma Hodzic;Jose L. Jimenez;Sasha Madronich;M. R. Canagaratna

  • Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications

    Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;L. Gregory Huey;Robert J. Yokelson;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Low and high NOx tropospheric photochemistry

    Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • Ozone formation at a rural site in the southeastern United States

    Lawrence Kleinman;Yin-Nan Lee;Stephen R. Springston;Linda Nunnermacker

  • The time evolution of aerosol composition over the Mexico City plateau

    Lawrence I. Kleinman;Stephen R. Springston;Peter H. Daum;Y. N. Lee

  • Ozone production rate and hydrocarbon reactivity in 5 urban areas: A cause of high ozone concentration in Houston

    L. I. Kleinman;P. H. Daum;D. Imre;Y.-N. Lee

  • Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere

    Lawrence I. Kleinman;Peter H. Daum;Jai H. Lee;Yin-Nan Lee

  • The dependence of tropospheric ozone production rate on ozone precursors

    Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • Seasonal dependence of boundary layer peroxide concentration: The low and high NO x regimes

    Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • Atmospheric chemistry and distribution of formaldehyde and several multioxygenated carbonyl compounds during the 1995 Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study

    Y.-N. Lee;X. Zhou;L. I. Kleinman;L. J. Nunnermacker

  • Photochemical formation of peroxides in the boundary layer

    Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • A comparative study of ozone production in five U.S. metropolitan areas

    L. I. Kleinman;P. H. Daum;Y.-N. Lee;L. J. Nunnermacker

  • Ozone production efficiency in an urban area

    Lawrence I. Kleinman;Peter H. Daum;Yin-Nan Lee;Linda J. Nunnermacker

  • Regional Influence of Aerosol Emissions from Wildfires Driven by Combustion Efficiency: Insights from the BBOP Campaign

    Sonya Collier;Shan Zhou;Timothy B. Onasch;Daniel A. Jaffe

  • Regional Influence of Wildfires on Aerosol Chemistry in the Western US and Insights into Atmospheric Aging of Biomass Burning Organic Aerosol

    Shan Zhou;Sonya Collier;Daniel A. Jaffe;Nicole L. Briggs

  • Enhanced SOA formation from mixed anthropogenic and biogenic emissions during the CARES campaign

    John E. Shilling;Rahul A. Zaveri;Jerome D. Fast;Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • Chemical evolution of volatile organic compounds in the outflow of the Mexico City metropolitan area

    E. C. Apel;L. K. Emmons;T. Karl;F. Flocke

  • Ozone process insights from field experiments – part II: Observation-based analysis for ozone production☆

    Lawrence I Kleinman

  • South East Pacific atmospheric composition and variability sampled along 20° S during VOCALS-REx

    G. Allen;H. Coe;A. Clarke;C. Bretherton

  • Spherical tarball particles form through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in biomass-burning smoke

    Kouji Adachi;Arthur J. Sedlacek;Lawrence Kleinman;Stephen R. Springston

  • Model correlations for ozone, reactive nitrogen, and peroxides for Nashville in comparison with measurements : Implications for O3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry

    Sanford Sillman;Dongyang He;Margaret R. Pippin;Peter H. Daum

  • The T1-T2 study: evolution of aerosol properties downwind of Mexico City

    J C Doran;James C Barnard;W P Arnott;R Cary

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen R. Springston
Stephen R. Springston Brookhaven National Laboratory
Peter H. Daum
Peter H. Daum Brookhaven National Laboratory
Jian Wang
Jian Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Timothy B. Onasch
Timothy B. Onasch Boston College
Leonard Newman
Leonard Newman Brookhaven National Laboratory
John E. Shilling
John E. Shilling Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Rahul A. Zaveri
Rahul A. Zaveri Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Kouji Adachi
Kouji Adachi Japan Meteorological Agency
Peter R. Buseck
Peter R. Buseck Arizona State University
Jerome D. Fast
Jerome D. Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career pathways, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge. For example, pairing your environmental expertise with a strong understanding of social dynamics can be highly valuable. Pursuing a best online bachelors in sociology programs can provide crucial insights into human-environment interactions and community engagement strategies.

For professionals seeking advanced specialization, online doctoral options continue to grow in flexibility and affordability. Many students appreciate programs without the added burden of dissertation requirements. Exploring online doctoral programs without dissertation can help tailor your education to practical skills and applied research.

The pathway from EdS to EdD further supports educators and specialists focusing on environmental education or policy. Schools providing eds to edd programs online make it easier to advance credentials without interrupting your career.

Additionally, those interested in social work related to environmental justice or community development may consider the cheapest online dsw programs. These programs combine social work expertise with doctoral-level rigor, offering opportunities to impact public policy and champion sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence I. Kleinman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles