World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 60 2979 2847 1164 1080 203 10901

John E. Shilling publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John E. Shilling between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John E. Shilling published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2023. 19 of the 257 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2023. 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 19 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 18 publications 2023: 34 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 8 publications
2002 2025

257 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John E. Shilling: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 2
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 6
2012 10
2013 13
2014 28
2015 12
2016 19
2017 9
2018 11
2019 17
2020 28
2021 17
2022 18
2023 34
2024 11
2025 8
Total 257
Download as CSV

John E. Shilling publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Shilling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 203
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

John E. Shilling D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Shilling sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166 60
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen
  • Meteorology

John E. Shilling spends much of his time researching Aerosol, Analytical chemistry, Mass spectrometry, Environmental chemistry and Ozone. He interconnects Atmosphere, Fraction, Inorganic chemistry, Sulfate and Relative humidity in the investigation of issues within Aerosol. In general Analytical chemistry, his work in Electrospray ionization is often linked to Desorption electrospray ionization linking many areas of study.

His Mass spectrometry research includes elements of Yield, Absorbance, Absorption, Chemical composition and Pinene. John E. Shilling focuses mostly in the field of Environmental chemistry, narrowing it down to topics relating to Hydrocarbon and, in certain cases, Alkyl, Reactive nitrogen, Diel vertical migration and Aerosol mass spectrometry. His research investigates the link between Ozone and topics such as Mass spectrum that cross with problems in Atmospheric chemistry and Oxygen.

His most cited work include:

  • Viscosity of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth and reactivity (238 citations)
  • Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing (204 citations)
  • Loading-dependent elemental composition of α-pinene SOA particles (184 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

John E. Shilling mostly deals with Aerosol, Atmospheric sciences, Analytical chemistry, Environmental chemistry and Cloud condensation nuclei. His Aerosol research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Volatility, Trace gas, Sulfate, NOx and Ozone. His Atmospheric sciences research also works with subjects such as

  • Atmosphere most often made with reference to Plume,
  • Pollution together with Wet season.

His Analytical chemistry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Relative humidity and Chemical composition. His Environmental chemistry study incorporates themes from Particulates and Atmospheric chemistry. His study in Cloud condensation nuclei is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Ammonium sulfate and Supersaturation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Aerosol (67.33%)
  • Atmospheric sciences (30.67%)
  • Analytical chemistry (24.00%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Aerosol (67.33%)
  • Atmospheric sciences (30.67%)
  • Amazon rainforest (6.67%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Aerosol, Atmospheric sciences, Amazon rainforest, Cloud condensation nuclei and Volatility. His Aerosol research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Atmosphere, Plume, Environmental chemistry, NOx and Troposphere. His Environmental chemistry study which covers Relative humidity that intersects with Chemical substance.

His study on Trace gas is often connected to Formation rate as part of broader study in Atmospheric sciences. His work in Amazon rainforest addresses subjects such as Pollution, which are connected to disciplines such as Energy budget, Atmospheric chemistry, Total organic carbon and Wet season. His research in Cloud condensation nuclei intersects with topics in Particle and Precipitation.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest (41 citations)
  • Spherical tarball particles form through rapid chemical and physical changes of organic matter in biomass-burning smoke (26 citations)
  • Anthropogenic enhancements to production of highly oxygenated molecules from autoxidation. (22 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Organic chemistry
  • Oxygen
  • Meteorology

His scientific interests lie mostly in Aerosol, Environmental chemistry, Atmospheric sciences, Volatility and Chemical transport model. John E. Shilling has included themes like Chemical physics, Atmosphere, Molecule, Plume and Organic chemicals in his Aerosol study. His Environmental chemistry research integrates issues from Layer, Organic nitrates and Phase.

The Atmospheric sciences study combines topics in areas such as Atmospheric chemistry, Total organic carbon, Amazon rainforest and Wet season. His Volatility research incorporates elements of Cloud condensation nuclei and Aqueous solution. His work deals with themes such as Photodissociation, Chemical substance, Particulates and Relative humidity, which intersect with Chemical transport model.

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in understanding secondary organic aerosol: Implications for global climate forcing

    Manish Shrivastava;Christopher D. Cappa;Jiwen Fan;Allen H. Goldstein

  • Viscosity of α-pinene secondary organic material and implications for particle growth and reactivity

    Lindsay Renbaum-Wolff;James W. Grayson;Adam P. Bateman;Mikinori Kuwata

  • Highly functionalized organic nitrates in the southeast United States: Contribution to secondary organic aerosol and reactive nitrogen budgets

    Ben H. Lee;Claudia Mohr;Felipe D. Lopez-Hilfiker;Anna Lutz

  • Molecular characterization of brown carbon (BrC) chromophores in secondary organic aerosol generated from photo-oxidation of toluene

    Peng Lin;Jiumeng Liu;John E. Shilling;Shawn M. Kathmann

  • Airborne measurements of western U.S. wildfire emissions: Comparison with prescribed burning and air quality implications

    Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;Xiaoxi Liu;L. Gregory Huey;Robert J. Yokelson;Vanessa Selimovic

  • Loading-dependent elemental composition of α-pinene SOA particles

    John E. Shilling;John E. Shilling;Qi Chen;Stephanie M. King;Thomas Rosenoern

  • Images reveal that atmospheric particles can undergo liquid-liquid phase separations

    Yuan You;Lindsay Renbaum-Wolff;Marc Carreras-Sospedra;Sarah J. Hanna

  • Urban pollution greatly enhances formation of natural aerosols over the Amazon rainforest

    Manish Shrivastava;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Meinrat O. Andreae;Paulo Artaxo;Henrique M. J. Barbosa

  • Optical properties and aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol

    Jiumeng Liu;Peng Lin;Alexander Laskin;Julia Laskin

  • Particle mass yield in secondary organic aerosol formed by the dark ozonolysis of α-pinene

    J. E. Shilling;Q. Chen;S. M. King;T. Rosenoern

  • Hydrolysis of Organonitrate Functional Groups in Aerosol Particles

    Shang Liu;John E. Shilling;Chen Song;Naruki Hiranuma

  • Particle-phase chemistry of secondary organic material: modeled compared to measured O:C and H:C elemental ratios provide constraints.

    Qi Chen;Yingjun Liu;Neil M. Donahue;John E. Shilling

  • The Green Ocean Amazon Experiment (GoAmazon2014/5) Observes Pollution Affecting Gases, Aerosols, Clouds, and Rainfall over the Rain Forest

    S. T. Martin;P. Artaxo;L. Machado;A. O. Manzi

  • Hygroscopic Growth of Ammonium Sulfate/Dicarboxylic Acids

    Matthew E. Wise;Jason D. Surratt;Daniel B. Curtis;John E. Shilling

  • An evaluation of global organic aerosol schemes using airborne observations

    Sidhant J. Pai;Colette L. Heald;Jeffrey R. Pierce;Salvatore C. Farina

  • Characterization of submicron particles influenced by mixed biogenic and anthropogenic emissions using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: results from CARES

    Ari Setyan;Qi Zhang;M. Merkel;Walter B. Knighton

  • Anthropogenic enhancements to production of highly oxygenated molecules from autoxidation

    Havala O. T. Pye;Havala O. T. Pye;Emma L. D’Ambro;Ben H. Lee;Siegfried Schobesberger;Siegfried Schobesberger

  • Modeling kinetic partitioning of secondary organic aerosol and size distribution dynamics: representing effects of volatility, phase state, and particle-phase reaction

    Rahul A. Zaveri;Richard C. Easter;John E. Shilling;J. H. Seinfeld

  • Regional Influence of Aerosol Emissions from Wildfires Driven by Combustion Efficiency: Insights from the BBOP Campaign

    Sonya Collier;Shan Zhou;Timothy B. Onasch;Daniel A. Jaffe

  • Enhanced SOA formation from mixed anthropogenic and biogenic emissions during the CARES campaign

    John E. Shilling;Rahul A. Zaveri;Jerome D. Fast;Lawrence I. Kleinman

  • Images reveal that atmospheric particles can undergo liquid-liquid phase separations

    A. K. Bertram;Y. You;L. Renbaum-Wolff;M. Carreras-Sospedra

Frequent Co-Authors

Jian Wang
Jian Wang Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen R. Springston
Stephen R. Springston Brookhaven National Laboratory
Rahul A. Zaveri
Rahul A. Zaveri Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Alla Zelenyuk
Alla Zelenyuk Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jiumeng Liu
Jiumeng Liu Harbin Institute of Technology
Jerome D. Fast
Jerome D. Fast Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Jason M. Tomlinson
Jason M. Tomlinson Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Joel A. Thornton
Joel A. Thornton University of Washington
Alexander Laskin
Alexander Laskin Purdue University West Lafayette
Jose L. Jimenez
Jose L. Jimenez University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Environmental Sciences often explore a range of related fields to broaden their expertise and career options. For those considering advanced study, a dsw program offers insights into sustainable social practices, emphasizing the intersection of environmental and community well-being.

If you prefer a flexible education path, the most affordable online general studies degree programs provide comprehensive knowledge across disciplines that can complement your environmental focus.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly or balance studies with other commitments, exploring the easiest bachelors degree options online may be a strategic choice, allowing you to gain relevant qualifications without excessive time or financial burdens.

Furthermore, pursuing specialized fields like geology and earth sciences through the best online geology degree programs can deepen your understanding of the physical environment, enhancing career prospects in research, conservation, or environmental consulting.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Shilling

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles