World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
14100
World Ranking
5415
National Ranking
1979

Donald C. Rundquist publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald C. Rundquist sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Donald C. Rundquist D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald C. Rundquist sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald C. Rundquist is affiliated with the University of Nebraska-Lincoln in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research and scholarly activities associated with this institution.

There are no specific details available on the recent papers authored or co-authored by Donald C. Rundquist, nor are there listed frequent co-authors or publication venues that define their research dissemination patterns.

No book publications or awards have been recorded for Donald C. Rundquist in the provided data, and there is no information about main fields or subfields of study associated with their work.

Likewise, no main topics of research or thematic concentrations have been specified, leaving those areas undefined in this profile.

Donald C. Rundquist is currently living, based on the available information.

Best Publications

  • Novel algorithms for remote estimation of vegetation fraction

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Yoram J. Kaufman;Robert Stark;Don Rundquist

  • Remote estimation of canopy chlorophyll content in crops

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Verónica Ciganda;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Remote estimation of leaf area index and green leaf biomass in maize canopies

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Timothy J. Arkebauer;Donald C. Rundquist

  • A simple semi-analytical model for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a in turbid waters: Validation

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Giorgio Dall'Olmo;Giorgio Dall'Olmo;Wesley Moses;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Relationship between gross primary production and chlorophyll content in crops: Implications for the synoptic monitoring of vegetation productivity

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Andrés Viña;Andrés Viña;Shashi B. Verma;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Remote estimation of nitrogen and chlorophyll contents in maize at leaf and canopy levels

    Michael Schlemmer;Anatoly A. Gitelson;James S. Schepers;Richard B. Ferguson

  • Assessing the potential of SeaWiFS and MODIS for estimating chlorophyll concentration in turbid productive waters using red and near-infrared bands

    Giorgio Dall'Olmo;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Donald C. Rundquist;Bryan Leavitt

  • Vegetation and soil lines in visible spectral space: a concept and technique for remote estimation of vegetation fraction

    A. A. Gitelson;R. Stark;U. Grits;D. Rundquist

  • Green leaf area index estimation in maize and soybean: Combining vegetation indices to achieve maximal sensitivity

    Anthony Nguy-Robertson;Anatoly Gitelson;Yi Peng;Andrés Viña

  • Towards a unified approach for remote estimation of chlorophyll‐a in both terrestrial vegetation and turbid productive waters

    Giorgio Dall'Olmo;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Monitoring Maize (Zea mays L.) Phenology with Remote Sensing

    Andrés Viña;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Donald C. Rundquist;Galina P. Keydan

  • Modelling relationships between NDVI and precipitation during vegetative growth cycles

    Liping Di;D. C. Rundquist;Luoheng Han

  • Remote measurement of algal chlorophyll in surface waters: The case for the first derivative of reflectance near 690 nm

    Donald C. Rundquist;Luoheng Han;John F. Schalles;Jeffrey S. Peake

  • Comparison of NIR/RED ratio and first derivative of reflectance in estimating algal-chlorophyll concentration: A case study in a turbid reservoir

    Luoheng Han;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Analysis of suspended solids in water using remotely sensed high resolution derivative spectra

    D. G. Goodin;Luoheng Han;R. N. Fraser;D. C. Rundquist

  • Benthic Habitat Mapping in Tropical Marine Environments Using QuickBird Multispectral Data

    Deepak Mishra;Sunil Narumalani;Donald Rundquist;Merlin Lawson

  • Remote estimation of crop gross primary production with Landsat data

    Anatoly A. Gitelson;Yi Peng;Jeffery G. Masek;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Remote estimation of gross primary production in maize and support for a new paradigm based on total crop chlorophyll content

    Yi Peng;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Galina Keydan;Donald C. Rundquist

  • Estimating green LAI in four crops: Potential of determining optimal spectral bands for a universal algorithm

    Anthony L. Nguy-Robertson;Yi Peng;Yi Peng;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Timothy J. Arkebauer

  • The spectral responses of algal chlorophyll in water with varying levels of suspended sediment

    L. Han;D. C. Rundquist;L. L. Liu;R. N. Fraser

  • Estimation of chlorophyll-a concentration in turbid productive waters using airborne hyperspectral data

    Wesley J. Moses;Anatoly A. Gitelson;Richard L. Perk;Daniela Gurlin

  • Towards a unified approach for remote estimation of chlorophyll-a in both terrestrial vegetation and turbid productive waters

    G. dall Olmo;A. A. Gitelson;D. C. Rundquist

Frequent Co-Authors

Anatoly A. Gitelson
Anatoly A. Gitelson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Timothy J. Arkebauer
Timothy J. Arkebauer University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Andrés Viña
Andrés Viña Michigan State University
Shashi B. Verma
Shashi B. Verma University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Andrew E. Suyker
Andrew E. Suyker University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Ram M. Narayanan
Ram M. Narayanan Pennsylvania State University
George Burba
George Burba University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Giorgio Dall'Olmo
Giorgio Dall'Olmo Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Richard B. Ferguson
Richard B. Ferguson University of Nebraska–Lincoln
James S. Schepers
James S. Schepers University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, exploring related fields such as sociology and education can open new career opportunities. Programs like the best online bachelors in sociology programs provide foundational knowledge in social behavior and environmental policy, complementing environmental studies with a broader social context.

Educators aiming to advance their qualifications often seek accredited pathways from Education Specialist to Doctor of Education. The accredited eds to edd programs offer structured routes to earn doctoral degrees online, facilitating career growth without disrupting professional commitments.

For those prioritizing flexibility, edd without dissertation options are gaining popularity. These programs allow educators to achieve doctoral credentials through practical projects instead of traditional dissertations, easing the path to degree completion.

In social work, affordable education options like the cheapest online dsw programs provide cost-effective routes to advanced practice and leadership roles. Combining these disciplines with environmental science can enrich career versatility and impact.

Best Scientists Citing Donald C. Rundquist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles