World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1573 1409 16 15 205 13099

Matthew Chersich publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew Chersich between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew Chersich published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 11 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2017. 12 of the 275 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2017. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 25 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

275 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew Chersich: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 9
2008 12
2009 10
2010 12
2011 18
2012 14
2013 13
2014 9
2015 7
2016 17
2017 25
2018 17
2019 20
2020 11
2021 12
2022 21
2023 7
2024 23
2025 11
2026 1
Total 275
Download as CSV

Matthew Chersich publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Chersich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 205 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 205
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew Chersich D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Chersich sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew Chersich is affiliated with the University of the Witwatersrand in South Africa. Their research centers primarily on the intersections of environmental and medical sciences, focusing on the health impacts of climate change and related topics.

The scientist's work appears extensively within the fields of Environmental Science and Medicine. Subfields of particular emphasis include Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions, and Health.

Chersich's main topics of work cover a range of public and global health concerns associated with environmental factors, such as:

  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Thermoregulation and physiological responses
  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Their recent notable papers include:

  • Associations between high temperatures in pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirths: systematic review and meta-analysis (2020, BMJ)
  • COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers (2020, Globalization and Health)
  • Dolutegravir with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection (ADVANCE): week 96 results from a randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial (2020, The Lancet HIV)
  • Physiological mechanisms of the impact of heat during pregnancy and the clinical implications: review of the evidence from an expert group meeting (2022, International Journal of Biometeorology)
  • Maternal and newborn health risks of climate change: A call for awareness and global action (2021, Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica)

Matthew Chersich frequently publishes in several venues, including:

  • ISEE Conference Abstracts
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Open Research Europe
  • International Journal of Biometeorology
  • BMJ Open

Among frequent co-authors collaborating with Chersich are:

  • Stanley Lüchters
  • Britt Nakstad
  • Sari Kovats
  • Véronique Filippi
  • Nathalie Roos

Best Publications

  • Dolutegravir plus Two Different Prodrugs of Tenofovir to Treat HIV

    Willem D F Venter;Michelle Moorhouse;Simiso Sokhela;Lee Fairlie

  • Inequities in access to health care in South Africa

    Bronwyn Harris;Jane Goudge;John E Ataguba;Diane McIntyre

  • Associations between high temperatures in pregnancy and risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirths: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Matthew Francis Chersich;Minh Duc Pham;Minh Duc Pham;Ashtyn Areal;Marjan Mosalam Haghighi

  • Attitudes and behaviours of maternal health care providers in interactions with clients: a systematic review

    Priya Mannava;Kelly Durrant;Jane Rosamond Woodward Fisher;Matthew Francis Chersich;Matthew Francis Chersich

  • COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers.

    Matthew F. Chersich;Glenda Gray;Lee Fairlie;Quentin Eichbaum;Quentin Eichbaum

  • Involving men to improve maternal and newborn health: A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions

    Mariam Tokhi;Liz Comrie-Thomson;Liz Comrie-Thomson;Liz Comrie-Thomson;Jessica Davis;Anayda Portela

  • Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Behavioral Risk Factors of Female Sex Workers in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

    Fiona Scorgie;Matthew F. Chersich;Matthew F. Chersich;Innocent Ntaganira;Antonio Gerbase

  • Intravaginal Practices, Bacterial Vaginosis, and HIV Infection in Women: Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis

    Nicola Low;Matthew F. Chersich;Matthew F. Chersich;Kurt Schmidlin;Matthias Egger

  • We are despised in the hospitals: sex workers experiences of accessing health care in four African countries.

    Fiona Scorgie;Daisy Nakato;Eric Harper;Marlise Richter

  • Effectiveness of HIV prevention for youth in sub-Saharan Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials.

    Kristien Michielsen;Matthew F Chersich;Stanley Luchters;Petra De Koker

  • Characteristics and outcomes of adult patients lost to follow-up at an antiretroviral treatment clinic in johannesburg, South Africa

    Rishikesh P Dalal;Catherine Macphail;Mmabatho Mqhayi;Jeff Wing

  • Effects of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy Duration and Regimen on Risk for Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV in Johannesburg, South Africa

    Risa M Hoffman;Vivian Black;Karl Technau;Karin Joan van der Merwe

  • Impact of five years of peer-mediated interventions on sexual behavior and sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Mombasa, Kenya

    Stanley Luchters;Matthew F. Chersich;Agnes Rinyiru;Mary Stella Barasa

  • Vulnerability of women in southern Africa to infection with HIV: biological determinants and priority health sector interventions.

    Matthew F Chersich;Helen V Rees

  • Priority interventions to reduce HIV transmission in sex work settings in sub-Saharan Africa and delivery of these services

    Matthew F Chersich;Stanley Luchters;Stanley Luchters;Stanley Luchters;Innocent Ntaganira;Antonio Gerbase

  • Human rights abuses and collective resilience among sex workers in four African countries: a qualitative study

    Fiona Scorgie;Katherine Elizabeth Vasey;Eric Harper;Marlise L Richter;Marlise L Richter

  • Health system weaknesses constrain access to PMTCT and maternal HIV services in South Africa: a qualitative enquiry

    Courtenay Sprague;Matthew F Chersich;Matthew F Chersich;Vivian Black

  • Utilization of traditional healers in South Africa and costs to patients: Findings from a national household survey

    Nonhlanhla Nxumalo;Olufunke Alaba;Bronwyn Harris;Matthew Chersich

  • Intravaginal Practices, Vaginal Infections and HIV Acquisition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Adriane Martin Hilber;Suzanna C. Francis;Matthew Chersich;Matthew Chersich;Pippa Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley Luchters
Stanley Luchters Ghent University
Helen Rees
Helen Rees University of the Witwatersrand
Marleen Temmerman
Marleen Temmerman Aga Khan University
Megan S. C. Lim
Megan S. C. Lim Burnet Institute
Kishorchandra Mandaliya
Kishorchandra Mandaliya University of Washington
Mark Stoove
Mark Stoove Burnet Institute
Margaret Hellard
Margaret Hellard Burnet Institute
Walter Jaoko
Walter Jaoko University of Nairobi
Charles D. H. Parry
Charles D. H. Parry South African Medical Research Council
Glenda Gray
Glenda Gray South African Medical Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens a diverse range of online degree options that can lead to promising careers in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. These fields are rapidly expanding and offer flexible educational paths designed for busy students and working professionals.

For those interested in counseling, it’s essential to consider cacrep accredited programs to ensure a high educational standard and better career opportunities. If your passion lies in supporting families and relationships, pursuing a masters in marriage and family therapy online equips you with specialized skills and flexibility as you study from anywhere.

Students who want to understand human behavior on a broader level should look into the most affordable online schools for psychology. Cost-effective options make this rewarding degree more accessible. If your goal is to launch a career in social work, there are msw programs with high acceptance rate that help you start making a difference in your community sooner.

Choosing the right online program empowers your personal and professional growth while supporting your journey into these vital human-centered careers.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Chersich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles