World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 34 9400 9002 3370 3122 129 6269

Rasmus Houborg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rasmus Houborg between 2004 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rasmus Houborg published across 23 years, from 2004 to 2026, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 5 of the 141 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
2004 2026

141 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rasmus Houborg: publications per year, 2004 to 2026
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 2
2007 3
2008 4
2009 5
2010 5
2011 3
2012 11
2013 8
2014 9
2015 15
2016 8
2017 12
2018 9
2019 10
2020 4
2021 5
2022 9
2023 6
2024 7
2025 4
2026 1
Total 141
Download as CSV

Rasmus Houborg publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Houborg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617 129
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Rasmus Houborg D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rasmus Houborg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123 34
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Rasmus Houborg is affiliated with South Dakota State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong focus on topics related to remote sensing and agricultural applications.

Their work extensively covers areas within remote sensing including its application in agriculture, LiDAR technologies, and environmental monitoring. Specific topics addressed by their research include:

  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Leaf Properties and Growth Measurement
  • Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

Houborg's scholarly output features publications in prominent venues such as:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Science of Remote Sensing
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent representative papers include:

  • A global analysis of the temporal availability of PlanetScope high spatial resolution multi-spectral imagery, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Early season prediction of within-field crop yield variability by assimilating CubeSat data into a crop model, 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Matching high resolution satellite data and flux tower footprints improves their agreement in photosynthesis estimates, 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • Timeliness in forest change monitoring: A new assessment framework demonstrated using Sentinel-1 and a continuous change detection algorithm, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • CubeSat constellations provide enhanced crop phenology and digital agricultural insights using daily leaf area index retrievals, 2022, Scientific Reports

In their collaborations, Houborg has frequently worked with various co-authors, including Trenton E. Franz, Matthew F. McCabe, Matteo G. Ziliani, B. Aragon, and Juwon Kong.

Their scientific contributions emphasize the integration of advanced remote sensing data with ecological and agricultural modeling to better understand environmental changes, crop yields, photosynthesis processes, and phenological patterns. These studies contribute to the broader understanding of environmental engineering and global change phenomena within ecological contexts.

Best Publications

  • A thermal-based remote sensing technique for routine mapping of land-surface carbon, water and energy fluxes from field to regional scales

    M.C. Anderson;J.M. Norman;W.P. Kustas;R. Houborg

  • Drought indicators based on model‐assimilated Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) terrestrial water storage observations

    Rasmus Houborg;Matthew Rodell;Bailing Li;Rolf Reichle

  • The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology.

    Matthew F. McCabe;Matthew Rodell;Douglas E. Alsdorf;Diego G. Miralles

  • Combining vegetation index and model inversion methods for the extraction of key vegetation biophysical parameters using Terra and Aqua MODIS reflectance data

    Rasmus Houborg;Henrik Soegaard;Eva Boegh

  • Response of Chlorophyll, Carotenoid and SPAD-502 Measurement to Salinity and Nutrient Stress in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

    Syed Haleem Shah;Rasmus Houborg;Matthew F. McCabe

  • A Cubesat enabled Spatio-Temporal Enhancement Method (CESTEM) utilizing Planet, Landsat and MODIS data

    Rasmus Houborg;Matthew F. McCabe

  • A hybrid training approach for leaf area index estimation via Cubist and random forests machine-learning.

    Rasmus Houborg;Rasmus Houborg;Matthew F. McCabe

  • Mapping leaf chlorophyll and leaf area index using inverse and forward canopy reflectance modeling and SPOT reflectance data

    Rasmus Houborg;Eva Boegh

  • Utility of an image-based canopy reflectance modeling tool for remote estimation of LAI and leaf chlorophyll content at the field scale

    Rasmus Houborg;Martha Anderson;Craig Daughtry

  • A global analysis of the temporal availability of PlanetScope high spatial resolution multi-spectral imagery

    David P. Roy;Haiyan Huang;Rasmus Houborg;Vitor S. Martins

  • High-Resolution NDVI from Planet’s Constellation of Earth Observing Nano-Satellites: A New Data Source for Precision Agriculture

    Rasmus Houborg;Matthew F. McCabe

  • A Random Forest Machine Learning Approach for the Retrieval of Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Wheat

    Syed Haleem Shah;Yoseline Angel;Rasmus Houborg;Shawkat Ali

  • Advances in remote sensing of vegetation function and traits

    Rasmus Houborg;Rasmus Houborg;Rasmus Houborg;Joshua B. Fisher;Joshua B. Fisher;Joshua B. Fisher;Andrew K. Skidmore;Andrew K. Skidmore;Andrew K. Skidmore

  • Satellite retrievals of leaf chlorophyll and photosynthetic capacity for improved modeling of GPP

    Rasmus Houborg;Alessandro Cescatti;Mirco Migliavacca;W. P. Kustas

  • Joint leaf chlorophyll content and leaf area index retrieval from Landsat data using a regularized model inversion system (REGFLEC)

    Rasmus Houborg;Matthew McCabe;Alessandro Cescatti;Feng Gao

  • Daily Retrieval of NDVI and LAI at 3 m Resolution via the Fusion of CubeSat, Landsat, and MODIS Data

    Rasmus Houborg;Matthew F. McCabe

  • CubeSats in Hydrology: Ultrahigh-Resolution Insights Into Vegetation Dynamics and Terrestrial Evaporation

    Matthew McCabe;B. Aragon;Rasmus Houborg;J. Mascaro

  • Regional simulation of ecosystem CO2 and water vapor exchange for agricultural land using NOAA AVHRR and Terra MODIS satellite data - application to Zealand, Denmark

    Rasmus Moeller Houborg;Henrik Soegaard

  • CubeSats Enable High Spatiotemporal Retrievals of Crop-Water Use for Precision Agriculture

    Bruno Aragon;Rasmus Houborg;Kevin Tu;Joshua B. Fisher

  • Using leaf chlorophyll to parameterize light-use-efficiency within a thermal-based carbon, water and energy exchange model

    Rasmus Houborg;Martha C. Anderson;C.S.T. Daughtry;W.P. Kustas

  • Advances in remote sensing of vegetation function and traits : special issue of International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

    R. Houborg;J.B. Fisher;A.K. Skidmore

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew F. McCabe
Matthew F. McCabe King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Martha C. Anderson
Martha C. Anderson Agricultural Research Service
William P. Kustas
William P. Kustas Agricultural Research Service
Joshua B. Fisher
Joshua B. Fisher Chapman University
Matthew Rodell
Matthew Rodell Goddard Space Flight Center
Alessandro Cescatti
Alessandro Cescatti European Union
Mirco Migliavacca
Mirco Migliavacca Joint Research Centre
Pierre Cellier
Pierre Cellier University of Paris-Saclay
Mark R. Theobald
Mark R. Theobald Technical University of Madrid
Benjamin F. Zaitchik
Benjamin F. Zaitchik Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens numerous opportunities, but students often consider complementary online programs to broaden their expertise. For those interested in advancing education leadership or policy development roles, exploring an online eds to edd bridge program can be a strategic step. These programs provide a pathway from a master's in education to a doctorate, which can be valuable in environmental education advocacy and administration.

For professionals focusing on social aspects of environmental science, such as community impact and social justice issues, affordable options like the cheapest online dsw programs offer advanced study at reduced costs, enabling integration of social work with environmental initiatives.

If you’re looking to diversify your skills or restart your academic journey, consider programs featured under best affordable online general studies degree programs. These flexible degrees can complement environmental science knowledge with broader interdisciplinary study.

Finally, for those seeking a quicker or more accessible route into the environmental field, examining the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into less demanding but still valuable academic options. This can be particularly helpful for students balancing work, family, or other commitments while studying.

Best Scientists Citing Rasmus Houborg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles