World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
14330
World Ranking
3793
National Ranking
148

Pierre Cellier publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Cellier sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Pierre Cellier D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Cellier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre Cellier is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research focuses primarily on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant volume of publications in these fields. The scientist's work spans multiple subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Ecology, Plant Science, and Environmental Chemistry.

Their research interests are aligned with key topics such as Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Climate change and permafrost, Cryospheric studies and observations, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics.

Some of the recent papers they have contributed to include:

  • "Standards and Open Access are the ICOS Pillars Reply to 'Comments on 'The Integrated Carbon Observation System in Europe''" (2023) published in HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • "The Integrated Carbon Observation System in Europe" (2021) published in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • "Long-term measurements of surface fluxes above a Scots pine forest in Hyytiälä, southern Finland, 1996-2001" (2024) published in Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive
  • "Tropical and Boreal Forest - Atmosphere Interactions: A Review" (2022) published in Tellus B
  • "Biogenic volatile organic compound emissions from the Eurasian taiga: current knowledge and future directions" (2024) published in Helda (University of Helsinki)

Frequent co-authors of Pierre Cellier include:

  • Timo Vesala (16 collaborations)
  • Markku Kulmala (11 collaborations)
  • Mika Aurela (11 collaborations)
  • Lutz Merbold (9 collaborations)
  • Annalea Lohila (9 collaborations)

The scientist's research is frequently published in venues such as:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 12 publications
  • Helda (University of Helsinki) with 7 publications
  • Biogeosciences with 6 publications
  • Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive with 5 publications
  • Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society with 3 publications

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • An overview of the crop model STICS

    N. Brisson;C. Gary;E. Justes;R. Roche

  • STICS : a generic model for the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory, and parameterization applied to wheat and corn

    Nadine Brisson;Bruno Mary;Dominique Ripoche;Marie Hélène Jeuffroy

  • Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions

    D. Fowler;Kim Pilegaard;M.A. Sutton;Per Ambus

  • Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance

    Reimo Kindler;Reimo Kindler;Jan Siemens;Jan Siemens;Klaus Kaiser;David Christopher Walmsley

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • Effects of climate and management intensity on nitrous oxide emissions in grassland systems across Europe

    C.R. Flechard;P. Ambus;U. Skiba;R.M. Rees

  • Mass transfer of pesticides into the atmosphere by volatilization from soils and plants: overview

    Carole Bedos;Pierre Cellier;Raoul Calvet;Enrique Barriuso

  • Flux-gradient relationships above tall plant canopies

    P. Cellier;Y. Brunet

  • Management effects on net ecosystem carbon and GHG budgets at European crop sites

    Eric Ceschia;Pierre Béziat;Jean-François Dejoux;M. Aubinet

  • Processes controlling ammonia emission from livestock slurry in the field

    S.G. Sommer;S. Génermont;P. Cellier;N.J. Hutchings

  • A mechanistic model for estimating ammonia volatilization from slurry applied to bare soil

    S. Génermont;P. Cellier

  • Challenges in quantifying biosphere–atmosphere exchange of nitrogen species

    M.A. Sutton;E. Nemitz;J.W Erisman;C. Beier

  • Effect of management, climate and soil conditions on N2O and NO emissions from an arable crop rotation using high temporal resolution measurements

    Patricia Laville;Simon Lehuger;Benjamin Loubet;Franck Chaumartin

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Predicting in situ soil N2O emission using NOE algorithm and soil database

    C. Hénault;F. Bizouard;P. Laville;B. Gabrielle

  • Modification of the soil temperature and water content regimes by a crop residue mulch: experiment and modelling

    François Bussière;Pierre Cellier

  • Carbon, nitrogen and Greenhouse gases budgets over a four years crop rotation in northern France

    Benjamin Loubet;Patricia Laville;Simon Lehuger;Eric Larmanou

  • A regional experiment suggests that soil texture is a major control of N2O emissions from tile-drained winter wheat fields during the fertilization period

    Jiangxin Gu;Bernard Nicoullaud;Philippe Rochette;Agnes Grossel

  • Nitrous oxide emissions from crop rotations including wheat, oilseed rape and dry peas

    M. H. Jeuffroy;M. H. Jeuffroy;E. Baranger;E. Baranger;B. Carrouée;E. de Chezelles;E. de Chezelles

  • Nitrous oxide fluxes from a fertilised maize crop using micrometeorological and chamber methods

    Patricia Laville;Corinne Jambert;Pierre Cellier;Robert Delmas

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin Loubet
Benjamin Loubet University of Paris-Saclay
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Mark R. Theobald
Mark R. Theobald Technical University of Madrid
Ute Skiba
Ute Skiba Natural Environment Research Council
Claus Beier
Claus Beier University of Copenhagen
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl
Klaus Butterbach-Bahl Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jørgen E. Olesen
Jørgen E. Olesen Aarhus University
Tommy Dalgaard
Tommy Dalgaard Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens the door to a variety of related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. For example, pursuing a easiest bachelor degree in fields like environmental studies or natural sciences can provide a solid foundation without overwhelming academic demands.

For those interested in more specialized knowledge, earning a geology degree online offers practical skills in understanding earth processes and resource management, which are vital for many environmental careers.

Additionally, colleges with GIS programs provide training in geographic information systems, a critical technology for mapping and analyzing environmental data. This expertise is highly sought after in urban planning, conservation, and resource management roles.

For professionals aiming to advance into leadership or policy-oriented roles, enrolling in one of the easiest online MPA programs can equip them with essential skills in public administration and environmental governance.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Cellier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles