World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
52
Citations
10856
World Ranking
4456
National Ranking
190

Benjamin Loubet publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Loubet sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 214 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Benjamin Loubet D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Loubet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Loubet is affiliated with the University of Paris-Saclay in France. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with a significant focus on subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Environmental Engineering, and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

Their work covers several main scientific topics, such as Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Plant responses to elevated CO2, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Urban Heat Island Mitigation, and Air Quality and Health Impacts.

Benjamin Loubet has contributed papers to a variety of scientific venues, often publishing multiple times in some. Frequent publication venues include The Science of The Total Environment, SSRN Electronic Journal, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Raluca Ciuraru, Florence Lafouge, Pauline Buysse, Céline Decuq, and Julien Kammer.

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Benjamin Loubet are:

  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands, 2020, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
  • Temperature extremes of 2022 reduced carbon uptake by forests in Europe, 2023, Nature Communications
  • Influence of Dynamic Ozone Dry Deposition on Ozone Pollution, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Reduced microbial diversity induces larger volatile organic compound emissions from soils, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Forests buffer thermal fluctuation better than non-forests, 2020, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • Atmospheric composition change: Ecosystems–Atmosphere interactions

    D. Fowler;Kim Pilegaard;M.A. Sutton;Per Ambus

  • Dissolved carbon leaching from soil is a crucial component of the net ecosystem carbon balance

    Reimo Kindler;Reimo Kindler;Jan Siemens;Jan Siemens;Klaus Kaiser;David Christopher Walmsley

  • Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia emission and deposition

    Mark A. Sutton;Stefan Reis;Stuart N. Riddick;Ulrike Dragosits

  • HONO Emissions from Soil Bacteria as a Major Source of Atmospheric Reactive Nitrogen

    R. Oswald;T. Behrendt;T. Behrendt;M. Ermel;M. Ermel;D. Wu;D. Wu

  • Challenges in quantifying biosphere–atmosphere exchange of nitrogen species

    M.A. Sutton;E. Nemitz;J.W Erisman;C. Beier

  • Effect of management, climate and soil conditions on N2O and NO emissions from an arable crop rotation using high temporal resolution measurements

    Patricia Laville;Simon Lehuger;Benjamin Loubet;Franck Chaumartin

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • The mass budget of atmospheric ammonia in woodland within 1 km of livestock buildings

    David Fowler;C. E. R. Pitcairn;Mark A. Sutton;C. Flechard

  • Field measurements of airborne concentration and deposition rate of maize pollen

    Nathalie Jarosz;Benjamin Loubet;Brigitte Durand;Alastair McCartney

  • Carbon, nitrogen and Greenhouse gases budgets over a four years crop rotation in northern France

    Benjamin Loubet;Patricia Laville;Simon Lehuger;Eric Larmanou

  • Advances in understanding, models and parameterizations of biosphere-atmosphere ammonia exchange

    Christophe Flechard;Raia Silvia Massad;Benjamin Loubet;Erwan Personne

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of reactive nitrogen and greenhouse gases at the NitroEurope core flux measurement sites: measurement strategy and first data sets

    U. Skiba;J. Drewer;Y.S. Tang;N. Van Dijk

  • Global parameterization and validation of a two-leaf light use efficiency model for predicting gross primary production across FLUXNET sites

    Yanlian Zhou;Xiaocui Wu;Weimin Ju;Weimin Ju;Jing M. Chen

  • Modelling airborne concentration and deposition rate of maize pollen

    Nathalie Jarosz;Benjamin Loubet;Laurent Huber

  • Ammonia deposition near hot spots: processes, models and monitoring methods

    Benjamin Loubet;Willem A. H. Asman;Mark R. Theobald;Ole Hertel

  • Variations in Maize Pollen Emission and Deposition in Relation to Microclimate

    Nathalie Jarosz;Benjamin Loubet;Brigitte Durand;Xavier Foueillassar

  • Biosphere-atmosphere interactions of ammonia with grasslands: Experimental strategy and results from a new European initiative

    M.A. Sutton;C. Milford;E. Nemitz;M.R. Theobald

  • An inverse model to estimate ammonia emissions from fields

    Benjamin Loubet;Benjamin Loubet;Sophie Genermont;Sophie Genermont;R. Ferrara;Carole Bedos;Carole Bedos

  • Temporal mosaicking approaches of Sentinel-2 images for extending topsoil organic carbon content mapping in croplands

    Emmanuelle Vaudour;Cécile Gomez;Philippe Lagacherie;Thomas Loiseau

  • Variability in carbon exchange of European croplands

    Eddy J. Moors;Cor Jacobs;Wilma W. Jans;Iwan Supit

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Cellier
Pierre Cellier University of Paris-Saclay
Mark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton Natural Environment Research Council
Eiko Nemitz
Eiko Nemitz UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology
Mark R. Theobald
Mark R. Theobald Technical University of Madrid
David Fowler
David Fowler University of Saskatchewan
Christof Ammann
Christof Ammann Federal Council
Martin Gallagher
Martin Gallagher University of Manchester
Valérie Gros
Valérie Gros Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Ute Skiba
Ute Skiba Natural Environment Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For those interested in spatial data and environmental mapping, pursuing best gis undergraduate programs provides critical skills in geographic information systems (GIS), which are vital for natural resource management and urban planning.

Graduates aiming to influence environmental policy and public sector leadership may consider advanced education through best online masters in public administration. These programs equip students with skills in governance, policy analysis, and program management tailored for environmental agencies and nonprofits.

Understanding social dynamics is also crucial. Hence, online sociology programs offer a valuable perspective on human behavior and community impact, with the online sociology degree bachelors being a flexible option for supplementing environmental studies.

For educators and leaders in environmental education seeking advanced professional development without the extensive commitment of a dissertation, exploring edd without dissertation programs can be a convenient pathway to enhance expertise and career advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Loubet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles