World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
22713
World Ranking
5779
National Ranking
3129

Lance J. Rips publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance J. Rips sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Lance J. Rips D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lance J. Rips sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Lance J. Rips is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States. Their research work spans primarily within the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a focus on subfields such as Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Literature and Literary Theory.

Their academic contributions include research on various psychological and cognitive topics, notably Child and Animal Learning Development, Emotions and Moral Behavior, Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies, Psychological and Educational Research Studies, Categorization, perception, and language, as well as Memory and Neural Mechanisms and Memory Processes and Influences.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Possible Objects: Topological Approaches to Individuation, 2020, published in Cognitive Science
  • The Capacity Limit of Personal Identity, 2020, published in Journal of Vision
  • How do we regard fictional people? How do they regard us?, 2023, published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Substances as a core domain, 2024, published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Is personal identity intransitive?, 2024, published in Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Frequent co-authors working alongside Lance J. Rips in their research include:

  • Julian De Freitas
  • Fabrizio Cariani
  • George A. Alvarez
  • Meghan Salomon-Amend
  • Susan J. Hespos

The scientist's work has appeared in various academic journals, reflecting a broad scope of research interests. These publication venues include:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Journal of Vision
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Lance J. Rips received the distinction of being named a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2008.

Best Publications

  • The Psychology of Survey Response

    Roger Tourangeau;Lance J. Rips;Kenneth A. Rasinski

  • Structure and process in semantic memory: A featural model for semantic decisions.

    Edward E. Smith;Edward J. Shoben;Lance J. Rips

  • Answering autobiographical questions: the impact of memory and inference on surveys

    Norman M. Bradburn;Lance J. Rips;Steven K. Shevell

  • Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations

    Lance J. Rips;Edward J. Shoben;Edward E. Smith

  • Similarity, typicality, and categorization

    Lance J. Rips

  • Inductive judgments about natural categories

    Lance J. Rips

  • Cognitive Processes in Propositional Reasoning.

    Lance J. Rips

  • The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking

    Lance J. Rips

  • Combining prototypes: A selective modification model.

    Edward E. Smith;Daniel N. Osherson;Lance J. Rips;Margaret Keane

  • Psychological connectedness and intertemporal choice.

    Daniel M. Bartels;Lance J. Rips

  • The Subjective Dates of Natural Events in Very-Long-Term Memory

    Norman R Brown;Lance J Rips;Steven K Shevell

  • Explanation and evidence in informal argument

    Sarah K. Brem;Lance J. Rips

  • Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model

    Unknown

  • From numerical concepts to concepts of number.

    Lance J. Rips;Amber Bloomfield;Jennifer Asmuth

  • The Current Status of Research on Concept Combination

    Lance J. Rips

  • Two Kinds of Reasoning

    Lance J. Rips

  • Memory for routines

    James A. Galambos;Lance J. Rips

  • Interpreting and evaluating metaphors

    Roger Tourangeau;Lance Rips

  • Similarity as an explanatory construct

    Steven A Sloman;Lance J Rips

  • Folk Psychology of Mental Activities

    Lance J. Rips;Frederick G. Conrad

  • Public memories and their personal context

    Norman R. Brown;Steven K. Shevell;Lance J. Rips

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger Tourangeau
Roger Tourangeau Westat (United States)
Kenneth A. Rasinski
Kenneth A. Rasinski University of Illinois at Chicago
George E. Newman
George E. Newman Yale University
Frederick G. Conrad
Frederick G. Conrad University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Douglas L. Medin
Douglas L. Medin Northwestern University
Steven A. Sloman
Steven A. Sloman Brown University
Edward E. Smith
Edward E. Smith Columbia University
Nick Chater
Nick Chater University of Warwick
Jeremy N. Bailenson
Jeremy N. Bailenson Stanford University
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens diverse online degree options and career pathways, especially in counseling. Many students now seek the quickest path to becoming a counselor in South Carolina through flexible, accredited online programs. These provide streamlined coursework and practical experience, helping candidates meet licensure criteria efficiently.

States are responding to growing mental health needs by offering South Dakota accelerated counseling programs that enable students to enter the field faster. Similarly, those interested in working in Tennessee can enroll in Tennessee fastest counseling programs, balancing rigorous academic standards with expedited timelines.

In Texas, professionals are turning to online resources to access Texas fastest counseling programs designed for quick career entry. Whether you are considering an undergraduate degree or a master’s in psychology, online pathways can provide convenience, affordability, and strong job prospects for future counselors across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Lance J. Rips

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles