World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
50
Citations
8597
World Ranking
17666
National Ranking
1223

Jana Seifert publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Seifert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Jana Seifert D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jana Seifert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jana Seifert is affiliated with the University of Hohenheim in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Animal Science and Zoology, Agronomy and Crop Science, Plant Science, and Ecology.

The scientist's research focuses on key topics such as gut microbiota and health, ruminant nutrition and digestive physiology, animal nutrition and physiology, probiotics and fermented foods, meat and animal product quality, genomics and phylogenetic studies, and reproductive physiology in livestock.

Seifert has published extensively in numerous scholarly journals. Frequent publication venues include Microbiome, Frontiers in Microbiology, Animals, Poultry Science, and the Journal of Animal Science.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jana Seifert include:

  • The Metaproteomics Initiative: a coordinated approach for propelling the functional characterization of microbiomes (2021, Microbiome)
  • Dynamic progression of the calf's microbiome and its influence on host health (2021, Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal)
  • Host metabolome and faecal microbiome shows potential interactions impacted by age and weaning times in calves (2023, Animal Microbiome)
  • Evolution of rumen and oral microbiota in calves is influenced by age and time of weaning (2021, Animal Microbiome)
  • Phytate degradation cascade in pigs as affected by phytase supplementation and rapeseed cake inclusion in corn-soybean meal-based diets (2020, Journal of Animal Science)

Jana Seifert collaborates regularly with several researchers across the field. Frequent co-authors include Amélia Camarinha-Silva, Johan S. Sáenz, M. Rodehutscord, Korinna Huber, and Jörn Bennewitz.

Best Publications

  • Gut microbiota disturbance during antibiotic therapy: a multi-omic approach.

    Ana Elena Pérez-Cobas;María José Gosalbes;Anette K. Friedrichs;Henrik Knecht

  • Anaerobic Microbial Degradation of Hydrocarbons : from Enzymatic Reactions to the Environment

    Ralf Rabus;Matthias Boll;Johann Heider;Rainer U. Meckenstock

  • Microbiota from the distal guts of lean and obese adolescents exhibit partial functional redundancy besides clear differences in community structure.

    Manuel Ferrer;Alicia Ruiz;Francesca Lanza;Sven-Bastiaan Haange;Sven-Bastiaan Haange

  • Membrane Vesicle Formation as a Multiple-Stress Response Mechanism Enhances Pseudomonas putida DOT-T1E Cell Surface Hydrophobicity and Biofilm Formation

    Thomas Baumgarten;Stefanie Sperling;Jana Seifert;Martin von Bergen

  • Diverse sulfate-reducing bacteria of the Desulfosarcina/Desulfococcus clade are the key alkane degraders at marine seeps

    Sara Kleindienst;Florian-Alexander Herbst;Marion Stagars;Frederick von Netzer

  • A Structural and Functional Elucidation of the Rumen Microbiome Influenced by Various Diets and Microenvironments

    Simon Deusch;Amélia Camarinha-Silva;Jürgen Conrad;Uwe Beifuss

  • Current Perspectives of the Chicken Gastrointestinal Tract and Its Microbiome

    Daniel Borda-Molina;Jana Seifert;Amélia Camarinha-Silva

  • Intestinal Microbiota and Microbial Metabolites Are Changed in a Pig Model Fed a High-Fat/Low-Fiber or a Low-Fat/High-Fiber Diet.

    Sonja N. Heinritz;Eva Weiss;Meike Eklund;Tobias Aumiller

  • Microbial minorities modulate methane consumption through niche partitioning.

    Paul L E Bodelier;Marion Meima-Franke;Cornelis A Hordijk;Anne K Steenbergh

  • Metaproteogenomic insights beyond bacterial response to naphthalene exposure and bio-stimulation

    María-Eugenia Guazzaroni;Florian-Alexander Herbst;Iván Lores;Javier Tamames

  • News in livestock research — use of Omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals

    Simon Deusch;Bruno Tilocca;Amélia Camarinha-Silva;Jana Seifert

  • Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology

    Martin von Bergen;Martin von Bergen;Nico Jehmlich;Nico Jehmlich;Martin Taubert;Martin Taubert;Carsten Vogt

  • Protein-SIP enables time-resolved analysis of the carbon flux in a sulfate-reducing, benzene-degrading microbial consortium

    Martin Taubert;Carsten Vogt;Tesfaye Wubet;Sabine Kleinsteuber

  • Gut Bacteria Metabolism Impacts Immune Recovery in HIV-infected Individuals.

    Sergio Serrano-Villar;David Rojo;Mónica Martínez-Martínez;Simon Deusch

  • Functional characterization of reductive dehalogenases by using blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

    Shuiquan Tang;Winnie W. M. Chan;Kelly E. Fletcher;Jana Seifert

  • Functional consequences of microbial shifts in the human gastrointestinal tract linked to antibiotic treatment and obesity.

    Ester Hernández;Rafael Bargiela;María Suárez Diez;Anette Friedrichs

  • Protein-based stable isotope probing

    Nico Jehmlich;Nico Jehmlich;Frank Schmidt;Martin Taubert;Jana Seifert

  • Population dynamics of iron-oxidizing communities in pilot plants for the treatment of acid mine waters.

    Elke Heinzel;Eberhard Janneck;Franz Glombitza;Michael Schlömann

  • Bacterial Diversity in a Mine Water Treatment Plant

    Elke Heinzel;Sabrina Hedrich;Eberhard Janneck;Franz Glombitza

  • Anaerobic naphthalene degradation by sulfate-reducing Desulfobacteraceae from various anoxic aquifers.

    Steffen Kümmel;Steffen Kümmel;Florian-Alexander Herbst;Arne Bahr;Márcia Duarte

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Nico Jehmlich
Nico Jehmlich Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Markus Rodehutscord
Markus Rodehutscord University of Hohenheim
Manuel Ferrer
Manuel Ferrer Spanish National Research Council
Hans H. Richnow
Hans H. Richnow Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Felipe Bastida
Felipe Bastida Spanish National Research Council
Rainer Mosenthin
Rainer Mosenthin University of Hohenheim
Hauke Harms
Hauke Harms Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Andrés Moya
Andrés Moya University of Valencia
Coral Barbas
Coral Barbas CEU San Pablo University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jana Seifert

Trending Scientists