World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
14472
World Ranking
10744
National Ranking
774

Nico Jehmlich publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico Jehmlich sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 268 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Nico Jehmlich D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nico Jehmlich sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nico Jehmlich is affiliated with the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research in Germany. Their research spans key areas in environmental science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus on molecular biology and ecology as subfields. The scientist's work engages with topics such as gut microbiota and health, microbial community ecology and physiology, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, genomics and phylogenetic studies, advanced proteomics techniques and applications, probiotics and fermented foods, as well as wastewater treatment and nitrogen removal.

The scientist has contributed to a number of publications, with frequent appearances in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Microorganisms, Microbiome, Frontiers in Microbiology, and The ISME Journal.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Synergistic biodegradation of aromatic-aliphatic copolyester plastic by a marine microbial consortium, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Metabolomics reveals impact of seven functional foods on metabolic pathways in a gut microbiota model, 2020, Journal of Advanced Research
  • The Metaproteomics Initiative: a coordinated approach for propelling the functional characterization of microbiomes, 2021, Microbiome

Frequent co-authors of Nico Jehmlich include Martin von Bergen, Sven-Bastiaan Haange, Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk, Robert Starke, and Stephanie Serena Schäpe.

Best Publications

  • Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria

    Holger Daims;Elena V. Lebedeva;Petra Pjevac;Ping Han

  • Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbial carbon cycling processes

    Ashish A. Malik;Jeremy Puissant;Kate M. Buckeridge;Tim Goodall

  • Soil fungal : Bacterial ratios are linked to altered carbon cycling

    Ashish A. Malik;Somak Chowdhury;Veronika Schlager;Anna Oliver

  • Dysbiotic gut microbiota causes transmissible Crohn's disease-like ileitis independent of failure in antimicrobial defence

    Monika Schaubeck;Thomas Clavel;Jelena Calasan;Ilias Lagkouvardos

  • Global ecological predictors of the soil priming effect

    Felipe Bastida;Carlos García;Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer;David J. Eldridge

  • Cyanate as an energy source for nitrifiers.

    Marton Palatinszky;Craig Herbold;Nico Jehmlich;Mario Pogoda

  • Rational design of a microbial consortium of mucosal sugar utilizers reduces Clostridiodes difficile colonization.

    Fátima C. Pereira;Kenneth Wasmund;Iva Cobankovic;Nico Jehmlich

  • Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane.

    Alexander Tøsdal Tveit;Anne Grethe Hestnes;Serina Lee Robinson;Arno Schintlmeister

  • The active microbial diversity drives ecosystem multifunctionality and is physiologically related to carbon availability in Mediterranean semi-arid soils

    Felipe Bastida;Irene F. Torres;José L. Moreno;Petr Baldrian

  • Differential sensitivity of total and active soil microbial communities to drought and forest management.

    Felipe Bastida;Irene F. Torres;Manuela Andrés-Abellán;Petr Baldrian

  • Protein-based stable isotope probing (Protein-SIP) reveals active species within anoxic mixed cultures

    Nico Jehmlich;Frank Schmidt;Martin von Bergen;Hans-Hermann Richnow

  • The ecological and physiological responses of the microbial community from a semiarid soil to hydrocarbon contamination and its bioremediation using compost amendment

    F. Bastida;F. Bastida;N. Jehmlich;K. Lima;B.E.L. Morris

  • Synergistic biodegradation of aromatic-aliphatic copolyester plastic by a marine microbial consortium.

    Ingrid E. Meyer-Cifuentes;Johannes Werner;Nico Jehmlich;Sabine E. Will

  • Insights from quantitative metaproteomics and protein-stable isotope probing into microbial ecology

    Martin von Bergen;Martin von Bergen;Nico Jehmlich;Nico Jehmlich;Martin Taubert;Martin Taubert;Carsten Vogt

  • Identification of periodontitis associated changes in the proteome of whole human saliva by mass spectrometric analysis.

    Manuela Gesell Salazar;Nico Jehmlich;Annette Murr;Vishnu M. Dhople

  • Combined Genomic and Proteomic Approaches Identify Gene Clusters Involved in Anaerobic 2-Methylnaphthalene Degradation in the Sulfate-Reducing Enrichment Culture N47

    Draženka Selesi;Nico Jehmlich;Martin von Bergen;Frank Schmidt

  • Synbiotic-driven improvement of metabolic disturbances is associated with changes in the gut microbiome in diet-induced obese mice.

    Xinxin Ke;Alesia Walker;Sven-Bastiaan Haange;Ilias Lagkouvardos

  • Comparative evaluation of saliva collection methods for proteome analysis.

    Claas Golatowski;Manuela Gesell Salazar;Vishnu Mukund Dhople;Elke Hammer

  • Protein-based stable isotope probing

    Nico Jehmlich;Nico Jehmlich;Frank Schmidt;Martin Taubert;Jana Seifert

  • Exercise Training in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure Promotes Restoration of High-Density Lipoprotein Functional Properties

    Volker Adams;Christian Besler;Tina Fischer;Meliana Riwanto

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin von Bergen
Martin von Bergen Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Jana Seifert
Jana Seifert University of Hohenheim
Felipe Bastida
Felipe Bastida Spanish National Research Council
Uwe Völker
Uwe Völker University of Greifswald
Hans H. Richnow
Hans H. Richnow Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Matthias Boll
Matthias Boll University of Freiburg
Petr Baldrian
Petr Baldrian Czech Academy of Sciences
Hauke Harms
Hauke Harms Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Gabriele Diekert
Gabriele Diekert Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Biology and Biochemistry offer diverse online academic and career opportunities in the USA. Students interested in health support and counseling can explore psych np programs, which focus on advanced psychiatric-mental health nursing and prepare graduates for in-demand roles.

For those passionate about nutrition and wellness, enrolling in an accelerated nutrition degree online can fast-track your entry into clinical nutrition, health education, or food safety careers. Meanwhile, if you’re interested in leadership, an affordable online mba healthcare management can broaden your scope, equipping you with essential management skills for roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Lastly, those considering medical office roles or hospital record-keeping may want to review the differences between ccs vs cpc certifications, which detail the costs, salary prospects, and suitability for medical coding specialists. Exploring these pathways ensures you find the online program and career that best fits your biology or biochemistry background.

Best Scientists Citing Nico Jehmlich

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles