World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
6860
World Ranking
7917
National Ranking
77

Daniel Algom publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Algom sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 134 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Algom D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Algom sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Algom is a researcher affiliated with Tel Aviv University in Israel, specializing in the fields of neuroscience and psychology. Their work spans multiple domains within these disciplines, with primary focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Algom's research encompasses various subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and speech and hearing. The scientist's investigations frequently address topics such as multisensory perception and integration, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural and behavioral psychology studies, hearing loss and rehabilitation, aesthetic perception and analysis, color perception and design, and neural dynamics and brain function.

The research outputs of Daniel Algom have been published in a range of academic venues. Notably, they have contributed to journals such as Memory & Cognition, Psychological Review, Frontiers in Neuroscience, Cognition & Emotion, and Auditory Perception & Cognition.

Recent papers authored by Algom include the following:

  • The Weber-Fechner law: A misnomer that persists but that should go away, 2021, Psychological Review
  • Can the Stroop effect serve as the gold standard of conflict monitoring and control? A conceptual critique, 2021, Memory & Cognition

Algom has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, including Daniel Fitousi, Yehuda I. Dor, Vered Shakuf, Boaz M. Ben-David, and Hilla Jacobson.

Throughout their career, Algom's work has addressed complex questions about sensory perception and cognitive processing. Their focus on the interface of neuroscience and psychology informs understanding of how sensory inputs are integrated and interpreted by the brain.

Best Publications

  • A Rational Look at the Emotional Stroop Phenomenon: A Generic Slowdown, Not a Stroop Effect.

    Daniel Algom;Eran Chajut;Shlomo Lev

  • Selective attention improves under stress: implications for theories of social cognition.

    Eran Chajut;Daniel Algom

  • Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a Stroop task.

    Yoav Bar-Anan;Nira Liberman;Yaacov Trope;Daniel Algom

  • Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects.

    Robert D. Melara;Daniel Algom

  • Distance-dependent processing of pictures and words.

    Elinor Amit;Daniel Algom;Yaacov Trope

  • The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited

    Daniel Algom;Amnon Dekel;Ainat Pansky

  • Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention.

    Ainat Pansky;Daniel Algom

  • Individual Differences in Loudness Processing and Loudness Scales

    Daniel Algom;Lawrence E. Marks

  • Remembered odors and mental mixtures: tapping reservoirs of olfactory knowledge.

    Daniel Algom;William S. Cain

  • Integration of stimulus dimensions in perception and memory: composition rules and psychophysical relations.

    Daniel Algom;Yuval Wolf;Bina Bergman

  • Psychophysical approaches to cognition.

    Daniel Algom

  • Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles.

    Tzvi Ganel;Eran Chajut;Daniel Algom

  • The stroop effect: It is not the robust phenomenon that you have thought it to be

    Miriam Dishon-Berkovits;Daniel Algom

  • Visual velocity input-output functions: The integration of distance and duration onto subjective velocity

    Daniel Algom;Lior Cohen-Raz

  • Comparative judgment of numerosity and numerical magnitude: attention preempts automaticity.

    Ainat Pansky;Daniel Algom

  • Range and regression, loudness scales, and loudness processing: toward a context-bound psychophysics.

    Daniel Algom;Lawrence E. Marks

  • Half a century of research on Garner interference and the separability-integrality distinction.

    Daniel Algom;Daniel Fitousi

  • Memory psychophysics for chemosensation: perceptual and mental mixtures of odor and taste

    Daniel Algom;Lawrence E. Marks;William S. Cain

  • Integration of stimulus dimensions in perception and memory: Composition rules and psychophysical relations.

    Unknown

  • A confluence of contexts: asymmetric versus global failures of selective attention to stroop dimensions.

    Merav Sabri;Robert D. Melara;Daniel Algom

  • Stroop and Garner effects in and out of Posner's beam: reconciling two conceptions of selective attention.

    Lilach Shalev;Daniel Algom

  • Comparing perception of Stroop stimuli in focused versus divided attention paradigms: Evidence for dramatic processing differences

    Ami Eidels;James T. Townsend;Daniel Algom

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence E. Marks
Lawrence E. Marks Yale University
Yaacov Trope
Yaacov Trope New York University
Nira Liberman
Nira Liberman Tel Aviv University
William S. Cain
William S. Cain University of California, San Diego
Amos D. Korczyn
Amos D. Korczyn Tel Aviv University
James T. Townsend
James T. Townsend Indiana University
Dan Zakay
Dan Zakay Reichman University
Martin H. Fischer
Martin H. Fischer University of Potsdam
Robert A. Levine
Robert A. Levine Harvard University
Jerome L. Singer
Jerome L. Singer Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in pursuing Psychology in the USA, exploring related online degrees and career pathways can expand your professional options. Many students opt for advanced certifications that enhance their expertise and employability, especially in specialized roles such as Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA).

The process to meet bcba certification requirements in Riverside involves a specific combination of education, fieldwork, and passing a national examination. Similarly, those considering becoming a bcba in Sacramento must ensure their degree is from an approved program and that they accumulate the necessary supervised experience hours.

Across the country, requirements may vary slightly. For instance, understanding the bcba certification requirements in Saint Paul or the steps involved in becoming a bcba in San Antonio can help you plan your educational journey more effectively.

Researching state-specific requirements and accredited degree programs is essential. Many online psychology degrees now include pathways to professional certifications, helping graduates move quickly into rewarding careers in behavioral analysis, counseling, or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Algom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles