World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
UK
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
91
Citations
36862
World Ranking
915
National Ranking
108

Karin Mogg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Mogg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karin Mogg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karin Mogg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United Kingdom Leader Award

Overview

Karin Mogg is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their academic and research activities are connected to this institution, which is known for its contributions to various fields of study.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues have been recorded for Karin Mogg. Likewise, there is no available information on book publications, main or subfields of study, or dominant research topics attributable to them.

There are no awards listed that have been granted to Karin Mogg, and no additional details are available regarding distinctions or recognitions. Current records indicate that Karin Mogg is living and active within their academic capacity.

Best Publications

  • A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety.

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Attentional Bias in Generalized Anxiety Disorder Versus Depressive Disorder

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Selective attention to angry faces in clinical social phobia.

    Karin Mogg;Pierre Philippot;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Amygdala and Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation to Masked Angry Faces in Children and Adolescents with Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Christopher S. Monk;Eva H. Telzer;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Attentional bias in anxiety and depression: The role of awareness

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Rachel Williams

  • Subliminal processing of emotional information in anxiety and depression

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Rachel Williams;Andrew Mathews

  • Time course of attentional bias for threat information in non-clinical anxiety.

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Jo De Bono;Michelle Painter

  • Attentional Bias for Threatening Facial Expressions in Anxiety: Manipulation of Stimulus Duration

    Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg;Sara J. Falla;Lucy R. Hamilton

  • Obese adults have visual attention bias for food cue images: evidence for altered reward system function

    Emily H. Castellanos;Evonne Charboneau;Mary S. Dietrich;Sohee Park

  • BRIEF REPORT Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance‐avoidance hypothesis

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Felicity Miles;Rachel Dixon

  • Selective orienting of attention to masked threat faces in social anxiety.

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P Bradley

  • Attentional bias for emotional faces in generalized anxiety disorder

    Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg;Jim White;Carla Groom

  • Biases in eye movements to threatening facial expressions in generalized anxiety disorder and depressive disorder.

    Karin Mogg;Neil Millar;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Bias in interpretation of ambiguous sentences related to threat in anxiety.

    Michael W. Eysenck;Karin Mogg;Jon May;Anne Richards

  • Attentional biases for negative information in induced and naturally occurring dysphoria

    Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg;Stacey C. Lee

  • Orienting of Attention to Threatening Facial Expressions Presented under Conditions of Restricted Awareness

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Covert and overt orienting of attention to emotional faces in anxiety

    Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg;Neil H. Millar

  • Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Matt Field;Jan De Houwer

  • Attention bias to threat in maltreated children: implications for vulnerability to stress-related psychopathology.

    Daniel S. Pine;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Lee Anne Montgomery

  • Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Activation and Attentional Bias in Response to Angry Faces in Adolescents With Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Christopher S Monk;Eric E Nelson;Erin B McClure;Karin Mogg

  • Memory bias in clinical anxiety.

    Karin Mogg;Andrew Mathews;John Weinman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Matt Field
Matt Field University of Sheffield
Matthew Garner
Matthew Garner University of Southampton
Allison M. Waters
Allison M. Waters Griffith University
Andrew Mathews
Andrew Mathews King's College London
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Christopher S. Monk
Christopher S. Monk University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael W. Eysenck
Michael W. Eysenck Royal Holloway University of London
Rona Moss-Morris
Rona Moss-Morris King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology often opens the door to numerous career opportunities in helping professions. Many students interested in psychology also explore social work as an alternative or complementary pathway. Online programs are making it easier for students across the country to earn their credentials while balancing work and family commitments.

If you're looking for flexibility and nationwide options, check out the best online social work programs in the US. Students located in Texas may want to consider the best online social work degree programs in Waco for region-specific opportunities. For those in the southern US, there are excellent programs such as the best social work degrees in Alabama and best social work degree programs in Arkansas.

Graduates can find rewarding roles in clinical practice, community organizations, schools, and healthcare settings. Whether you choose psychology or social work, online education provides a flexible, accessible route toward a fulfilling career making a real difference in people’s lives.

Best Scientists Citing Karin Mogg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles