World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 31 11133 10415 1082 1034 108 5177

Matthew Garner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew Garner between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew Garner published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2015. 14 of the 136 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2015. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
2005 2026

136 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew Garner: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 4
2007 9
2008 6
2009 9
2010 6
2011 3
2012 3
2013 5
2014 9
2015 16
2016 12
2017 6
2018 6
2019 4
2020 2
2021 2
2022 7
2023 6
2024 6
2025 13
2026 1
Total 136
Download as CSV

Matthew Garner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Garner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew Garner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Garner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30–31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398 31
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew Garner is affiliated with the University of Southampton in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines within medicine, neuroscience, and psychology, with a focus on clinical applications and experimental studies.

The primary fields of study represented in Garner's work include:

  • Medicine
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Their subfields demonstrate specialized interests in:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Pharmacology
  • Transplantation
  • Neurology

Key research topics covered by Garner involve:

  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Treatment of Major Depression
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry

Garner has published multiple papers within well-recognized venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Transplantation
  • Neuroscience Applied
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Clinical Transplantation

Among notable recent papers are:

  • "Efficacy of neurostimulation across mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of 208 randomized controlled trials" (2022, Molecular Psychiatry)
  • "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Across Mental Disorders" (2024, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Why we need more research into the placebo response in psychiatry" (2020, Psychological Medicine)
  • "Feasibility, acceptability and practicality of transcranial stimulation in obsessive compulsive symptoms (FEATSOCS): A randomised controlled crossover trial" (2023, Comprehensive Psychiatry)
  • "Placebo effects in randomized trials of pharmacological and neurostimulation interventions for mental disorders: An umbrella review" (2024, Molecular Psychiatry)

Collaborative relationships have been established frequently with several researchers including:

  • David S. Baldwin
  • Nathan T. M. Huneke
  • Samuele Cortese
  • Colleen L. Jay
  • Alan C. Farney

Best Publications

  • Orienting and maintenance of gaze to facial expressions in social anxiety.

    Matthew Garner;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues

    Kathy R. Berenson;Anett Gyurak;Özlem Ayduk;Geraldine Downey

  • Effects of threat cues on attentional shifting, disengagement and response slowing in anxious individuals

    Karin Mogg;Amanda Holmes;Matthew Garner;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Efficacy of neurostimulation across mental disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of 208 randomized controlled trials

    Unknown

  • Biases in visual orienting to negative and positive scenes in dysphoria: An eye movement study

    Xavier Caseras;Matthew Garner;Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg

  • Anxiety and orienting of gaze to angry and fearful faces

    Karin Mogg;Matthew Garner;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the treatment of depression: Systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and tolerability

    Daniel Meron;Nicholas Hedger;Matthew Garner;David S. Baldwin;David S. Baldwin

  • The development of information processing biases in childhood anxiety: A review and exploration of its origins in parenting

    Julie A. Hadwin;Matthew Garner;Gisela Perez-Olivas

  • The effect of focused attention and open monitoring meditation on attention network function in healthy volunteers

    Ben Ainsworth;Rachael Eddershaw;Daniel Meron;David S. Baldwin

  • The development of emotion recognition from facial expressions and non-linguistic vocalizations during childhood

    Georgia Chronaki;Georgia Chronaki;Julie A. Hadwin;Matthew Garner;Pierre Maurage

  • Peripheral inflammatory cytokines and immune balance in Generalised Anxiety Disorder: Case-controlled study.

    Ruihua Hou;Matthew Garner;Clive Holmes;Clive Osmond

  • Faces and awareness: low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance.

    Katie L. H. Gray;Wendy J. Adams;Nicholas Hedger;Kristiana E. Newton

  • High-Level Face Adaptation Without Awareness

    Wendy J. Adams;Katie L.H. Gray;Matthew Garner;Erich W. Graf

  • Are visual threats prioritized without awareness? A critical review and meta-analysis involving 3 behavioral paradigms and 2696 observers.

    Nicholas Hedger;Katie L. H. Gray;Matthew Garner;Wendy J. Adams

  • Fearful faces have a sensory advantage in the competition for awareness.

    Nicholas Hedger;Wendy J. Adams;Matthew Garner

  • Research in anxiety disorders: From the bench to the bedside

    Matthew Garner;Hanns Möhler;Dan J. Stein;Thomas Mueggler

  • Influence of negative affect on selective attention to smoking-related cues and urge to smoke in cigarette smokers.

    Brendan P. Bradley;Matthew Garner;Laura Hudson;Karin Mogg

  • Fear-relevant selective associations and social anxiety: absence of a positive bias.

    Matthew Garner;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Inhalation of 7.5% Carbon Dioxide Increases Threat Processing in Humans

    Matthew Garner;Angela S Attwood;David S Baldwin;Alexandra James

  • Impaired identification of fearful faces in Generalised Social Phobia.

    Matthew Garner;David S. Baldwin;Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg

  • Pharmacological Treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    David S. Baldwin;Khalil I. Ajel;Matthew Garner

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Baldwin
David S. Baldwin University of Southampton
Julie A. Hadwin
Julie A. Hadwin University of Southampton
Karin Mogg
Karin Mogg University of Southampton
Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Simon Paul Liversedge
Simon Paul Liversedge University of Central Lancashire
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke King's College London
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Clive Osmond
Clive Osmond University of Southampton
Margaret Thompson
Margaret Thompson University of Southampton
Clive Holmes
Clive Holmes University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens the door to a variety of online degree programs and career opportunities, especially in mental health counseling. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility while providing essential knowledge in human behavior, counseling techniques, and mental health support.

As you explore career pathways, keep in mind that certification and licensure requirements vary by location. For instance, to work as a counselor in Washington State, you should familiarize yourself with Spokane mental health counselor certification requirements. Similarly, those interested in working in the Midwest can learn more about mental health counselor requirements in St. Louis.

Students planning to practice in Florida should review the mental health counselor requirements in St. Petersburg. California also has its own steps, so look into how to become a mental health counselor in Stockton. Understanding these local requirements is crucial for successfully launching your career after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Garner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles