World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
68
Citations
17149
World Ranking
2482
National Ranking
271

Matt Field publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Field sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 289 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Matt Field D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matt Field sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 68 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matt Field is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a substantial focus on Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The scientist's work centers on several key topics, including Behavioral Health and Interventions, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Mental Health Research Topics, Smoking Behavior and Cessation, and Gambling Behavior and Treatments.

Recent publications by Matt Field cover a range of subjects within these areas. Notable papers include:

  • "Moderators of changes in smoking, drinking and quitting behaviour associated with the first COVID-19 lockdown in England" (2021, Addiction)
  • "Food-related attentional bias and its associations with appetitive motivation and body weight: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (2020, Appetite)
  • "Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction" (2020, Behavioural Brain Research)
  • "Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study" (2022, Addiction)
  • "Associations of alcohol use, mental health and socioeconomic status in England: Findings from a representative population survey" (2020, Drug and Alcohol Dependence)

Matt Field frequently collaborates with several other researchers, including Jamie Brown, Marcus R. Munafò, Matthew Hickman, Claire Garnett, and Susan Michie. These frequent coauthors have contributed to advancing research across overlapping interests in behavioral and addiction research.

The scientist's work has been published in a variety of journals, with a significant number of papers appearing in Addiction and Addiction Research & Theory. Other venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, and http://isrctn.com/.

Best Publications

  • Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences

    Matt Field;W. Miles Cox

  • A Meta-Analytic Investigation of the Relationship Between Attentional Bias and Subjective Craving in Substance Abuse

    Matt Field;Marcus R. Munafò;Ingmar H. A. Franken

  • Eye movements to smoking-related pictures in smokers: relationship between attentional biases and implicit and explicit measures of stimulus valence

    Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley;Matt Field;Jan De Houwer

  • Experimental manipulation of attentional bias increases the motivation to drink alcohol.

    Matt Field;Brian Eastwood

  • Attentional biases for alcohol cues in heavy and light social drinkers: the roles of initial orienting and maintained attention

    Matt Field;Karin Mogg;Jessica Zetteler;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Delay discounting and the alcohol Stroop in heavy drinking adolescents.

    Matt Field;Paul Christiansen;Jon Cole;Andrew Goudie

  • Acute Alcohol Effects on Inhibitory Control and Implicit Cognition: Implications for Loss of Control Over Drinking

    Matt Field;Reinout W. Wiers;Paul Christiansen;Mark T. Fillmore

  • Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness

    Andrew Jones;Lisa C.G. Di Lemma;Eric Robinson;Paul Christiansen

  • Compliance with Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Substance Users: a Meta-Analysis

    Andrew Jones;Danielle Remmerswaal;Ilse Verveer;Eric Robinson

  • Attentional bias in drug dependence: vigilance for cigarette-related cues in smokers.

    Brendan P. Bradley;Karin Mogg;Tamsin Wright;Matt Field

  • Multiple behavioural impulsivity tasks predict prospective alcohol involvement in adolescents.

    Gordon Fernie;Margot Peeters;Matthew J. Gullo;Paul Christiansen

  • Attentional and approach biases for smoking cues in smokers: an investigation of competing theoretical views of addiction.

    Karin Mogg;Matt Field;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation.

    Matt Field;Karin Mogg;Brendan P. Bradley

  • Rapid approach responses to alcohol cues in heavy drinkers.

    Matt Field;Anna Kiernan;Brian Eastwood;Robert Child

  • Attentional and evaluative biases for smoking cues in nicotine dependence: component processes of biases in visual orienting.

    B.P. Bradley;M. Field;K. Mogg;J. De Houwer

  • Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: the effects of nicotine deprivation.

    Matt Field;Mary Santarcangelo;Harry Sumnall;Andrew Goudie

  • The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction

    Matt Field;Jessica Werthmann;Ingmar Franken;Wilhelm Hofmann

  • Risk-taking but not response inhibition or delay discounting predict alcohol consumption in social drinkers

    Gordon Fernie;Jon C. Cole;Andrew J. Goudie;Matt Field

  • Experimental manipulation of attentional biases in heavy drinkers: do the effects generalise?

    Matt Field;Theodora Duka;Brian Eastwood;Robert Child

  • Effects of a low dose of alcohol on cognitive biases and craving in heavy drinkers

    Tim Schoenmakers;Tim Schoenmakers;Reinout W. Wiers;Reinout W. Wiers;Matt Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Christiansen
Paul Christiansen University of Liverpool
Eric Robinson
Eric Robinson University of Liverpool
Jon C. Cole
Jon C. Cole University of Liverpool
Brendan P. Bradley
Brendan P. Bradley University of Southampton
Karin Mogg
Karin Mogg University of Southampton
Marcus R. Munafò
Marcus R. Munafò University of Bath
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Ingmar H.A. Franken
Ingmar H.A. Franken Erasmus University Rotterdam
Lee Hogarth
Lee Hogarth University of Exeter
Theodora Duka
Theodora Duka University of Sussex

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens up a variety of specialized roles, with Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) being among the most in-demand. To pursue this path, you’ll need to meet advanced degree and certification requirements that can vary by location and institution.

For instance, the Detroit bcba education requirements focus on completing a graduate program in behavior analysis or a related field, along with supervised practical experience. In comparison, Durham bcba requirements and bcba certification requirements in El Paso emphasize accredited coursework and a clear route to the BCBA exam after earning your qualifying degree.

If you’re planning to work in the Midwest, you can explore how to become a bcba in Fort Wayne for tailored steps and recommendations. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees in psychology and behavior analysis, making it easier to balance your studies with work. With the right degree and credentials, career pathways in education, mental health, rehabilitation, and private practice become available.

Best Scientists Citing Matt Field

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles