World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
33080
World Ranking
14918
National Ranking
7542

Martin J. Tobin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Tobin sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 357 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martin J. Tobin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Tobin sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Tobin is affiliated with Loyola University Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with significant contributions in pulmonary and respiratory medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, biomedical engineering, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to respiratory support and mechanisms, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, non-invasive vital sign monitoring, airway management and intubation techniques, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, and the impacts of climate change on health.

Martin J. Tobin has published extensively in several journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (8 publications)
  • Annals of Intensive Care (4 publications)
  • CHEST Journal (4 publications)
  • International Journal for Population Data Science (3 publications)
  • European Respiratory Journal (2 publications)

Frequent co-authors in their research include Amal Jubran, Franco Laghi, Anna L. Guyatt, Catherine John, and Hameeda Shaikh.

Recent papers highlight their ongoing research efforts related to COVID-19 and respiratory care, including:

  • "Why COVID-19 Silent Hypoxemia Is Baffling to Physicians," 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Basing Respiratory Management of COVID-19 on Physiological Principles," 2020, American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • "Caution about early intubation and mechanical ventilation in COVID-19," 2020, Annals of Intensive Care
  • "P-SILI is not justification for intubation of COVID-19 patients," 2020, Annals of Intensive Care
  • "Noninvasive strategies in COVID-19: epistemology, randomised trials, guidelines, physiology," 2020, European Respiratory Journal

Best Publications

  • Characteristics and Outcomes in Adult Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A 28-Day International Study

    Andrés Esteban;Antonio Anzueto;Fernando Frutos;Inmaculada Alía

  • A comparison of four methods of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. Spanish Lung Failure Collaborative Group.

    Esteban A;Frutos F;Tobin Mj;Alía I

  • A Prospective Study of Indexes Predicting the Outcome of Trials of Weaning from Mechanical Ventilation

    K. L. Yang;M. J. Tobin

  • How is mechanical ventilation employed in the intensive care unit? An international utilization review.

    Andrés Esteban;Antonio Anzueto;Inmaculada Alía;Federico Gordo

  • Tidal Volume Reduction for Prevention of Ventilator-induced Lung Injury in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

    Brochard L;Roudot-Thoraval F;Roupie E;Delclaux C

  • Effect of spontaneous breathing trial duration on outcome of attempts to discontinue mechanical ventilation

    A Esteban;I Alía;M J Tobin;A Gil

  • Principles and Practice of Mechanical Ventilation

    Martin J. Tobin

  • Disorders of the Respiratory Muscles

    Franco Laghi;Martin J. Tobin

  • Advances in Mechanical Ventilation

    Martin J. Tobin

  • Modes of Mechanical Ventilation and Weaning: A National Survey of Spanish Hospitals

    Andrés Esteban;Inmaculada Alia;Jordi Ibañez;Salvador Benito

  • Why COVID-19 Silent Hypoxemia Is Baffling to Physicians.

    Martin J. Tobin;Franco Laghi;Amal Jubran

  • The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure.

    E Akoumianaki;Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore;F Valenza;G Bellani

  • Pathophysiologic basis of acute respiratory distress in patients who fail a trial of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

    A Jubran;M J Tobin

  • The pattern of breathing during successful and unsuccessful trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation.

    M J Tobin;W Perez;S M Guenther;B J Semmes

  • Sleep in the intensive care unit

    Sairam Parthasarathy;Martin J. Tobin

  • Is Weaning Failure Caused by Low-Frequency Fatigue of the Diaphragm?

    Franco Laghi;Steven E. Cattapan;Amal Jubran;Sairam Parthasarathy

  • Breathing Patterns: 2. Diseased Subjects

    Martin J. Tobin;Tejvir S. Chadha;Gilbert Jenouri;Stephen J. Birch

  • Variability of patient-ventilator interaction with pressure support ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    A Jubran;W B Van de Graaff;M J Tobin

  • Effect of Ventilator Mode on Sleep Quality in Critically Ill Patients

    Sairam Parthasarathy;Martin J. Tobin;Martin J. Tobin

  • Breathing patterns. 1. Normal subjects.

    Martin J. Tobin;Tejvir S. Chadha;Gilbert Jenouri;Stephen J. Birch

Frequent Co-Authors

Antonio Anzueto
Antonio Anzueto The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Laurent Brochard
Laurent Brochard St. Michael's Hospital
Omar Khadeer Hussain
Omar Khadeer Hussain University of New South Wales
Caroline A. Owen
Caroline A. Owen Brigham and Women's Hospital
Richard Casaburi
Richard Casaburi University of California, Los Angeles
Antonio Pesenti
Antonio Pesenti University of Milan
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Luciano Gattinoni
Luciano Gattinoni University of Göttingen
Arthur S. Slutsky
Arthur S. Slutsky University of Toronto
Roger S. Goldstein
Roger S. Goldstein University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t just mean becoming a physician. There are diverse online degree options that open the door to rewarding healthcare roles, often with flexible pathways and unique requirements.

For students considering nursing, there are nursing schools that don't require teas test, making it easier to start your education without additional exam hurdles. If you’re interested in management or administrative roles, an online healthcare administration degree can prepare you for leadership positions in hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations.

Licensed nurses aiming to advance their careers may consider bridging programs, such as asn to np pathways, which help you progress from an Associate Degree in Nursing to a Nurse Practitioner role in less time. Another in-demand field is nutrition, and earning a nutrition degree online provides opportunities in wellness, public health, and clinical settings.

These related online degrees and career pathways allow you to find your niche in healthcare, whether you prefer direct patient care, administration, or specialized support roles.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Tobin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles