World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
6269
World Ranking
11166
National Ranking
337

Omar Khadeer Hussain publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omar Khadeer Hussain sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 273 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Omar Khadeer Hussain D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omar Khadeer Hussain sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Omar Khadeer Hussain is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research spans multiple areas within Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, contributing extensively to both fields through numerous publications.

The main fields of study for this researcher are Computer Science, with 82 publications, and Business, Management and Accounting, with 43 publications. Their work delves deeply into several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence (38 publications), Information Systems (25 publications), Strategy and Management (22 publications), Management Information Systems (18 publications), and Computer Networks and Communications (15 publications).

Research topics covered by the scientist include:

  • Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Quality and Supply Management
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Occupational Health and Safety Research
  • Risk and Safety Analysis

The researcher has published frequently in several venues, with notable counts including:

  • Knowledge-Based Systems (8 publications)
  • Future Generation Computer Systems (5 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (5 publications)
  • Expert Systems with Applications (4 publications)
  • International Journal of Web and Grid Services (4 publications)

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Omar Khadeer Hussain include:

  • "GBK-means clustering algorithm: An improvement to the K-means algorithm based on the bargaining game", 2021, Knowledge-Based Systems
  • "Smart contracts for blockchain-based reputation systems: A systematic literature review", 2020, Journal of Network and Computer Applications
  • "IntelliBot: A Dialogue-based chatbot for the insurance industry", 2020, Knowledge-Based Systems
  • "Advanced deep learning approaches to predict supply chain risks under COVID-19 restrictions", 2022, Expert Systems with Applications
  • "Blockchain-based micro-credentialing system in higher education institutions: Systematic literature review", 2023, Knowledge-Based Systems

Frequent collaborators in their work include Farookh Khadeer Hussain, Morteza Saberi, Ripon K. Chakrabortty, Daniel D. Prior, and Hang Thanh Bui.

Best Publications

  • Support vector regression with chaos-based firefly algorithm for stock market price forecasting

    Ahmad Kazem;Ebrahim Sharifi;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Morteza Saberi

  • A mixed traffic capacity analysis and lane management model for connected automated vehicles: A Markov chain method

    Amir Ghiasi;Omar Hussain;Zhen (Sean) Qian;Xiaopeng Li

  • ZBWM: The Z-number extension of Best Worst Method and its application for supplier development

    Hamed Aboutorab;Morteza Saberi;Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • Cloud service selection

    Le Sun;Hai Dong;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • A Survey on Chatbot Implementation in Customer Service Industry through Deep Neural Networks

    Mohammad Nuruzzaman;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • Towards Multi-criteria Cloud Service Selection

    Zia ur Rehman;Farookh K. Hussain;Omar K. Hussain

  • An MCDM method for cloud service selection using a Markov chain and the best-worst method

    Falak Nawaz;Mehdi Rajabi Asadabadi;Naeem Khalid Janjua;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • Review: Cognitive radio network security: A survey

    Sazia Parvin;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Omar Khadeer Hussain;Song Han

  • Iaas Cloud Selection using MCDM Methods

    Zia ur Rehman;O. K. Hussain;F. K. Hussain

  • Goal-Oriented Prosumer Community Groups for the Smart Grid

    A. J. Dinusha Rathnayaka;Vidyasagar M. Potdar;Tharam Dillon;Omar Hussain

  • Parallel Cloud Service Selection and Ranking Based on QoS History

    Zia Ur Rehman;Omar Khadeer Hussain;Farookh Khadeer Hussain

  • GBK-means clustering algorithm: An improvement to the K-means algorithm based on the bargaining game

    Mustafa Jahangoshai Rezaee;Milad Eshkevari;Morteza Saberi;Omar Hussain

  • Identifying prosumer's energy sharing behaviours for forming optimal prosumer-communities

    A. J. Dinusha Rathnayaka;Vidyasagar M. Potdar;Omar Hussain;Tharam Dillon

  • A Methodology to Find Influential Prosumers in Prosumer Community Groups

    A. J. Dinusha Rathnayaka;Vidyasagar M. Potdar;Tharam S. Dillon;Omar K. Hussain

  • Clustering-Driven Intelligent Trust Management Methodology for the Internet of Things (CITM-IoT)

    Mohammad Dahman Alshehri;Mohammad Dahman Alshehri;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • Smart contracts for blockchain-based reputation systems: A systematic literature review

    Ahmed S. Almasoud;Ahmed S. Almasoud;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • IntelliBot: A Dialogue-based chatbot for the insurance industry

    Mohammad Nuruzzaman;Omar Khadeer Hussain

  • Explainability in supply chain operational risk management: A systematic literature review

    Sonia Farhana Nimmy;Omar K. Hussain;Ripon K. Chakrabortty;Farookh Khadeer Hussain

  • Special issue on cyber physical systems

    Fatos Xhafa;Leonard Barolli;Omar Hussain

  • Digital Revolution for Hajj Crowd Management: A Technology Survey

    Emad A. Felemban;Faizan Ur Rehman;Sardar Asad Ali Biabani;Akhlaq Ahmad

  • A Knapsack problem approach for achieving efficient energy consumption in smart grid for endusers' life style

    Omid Ameri Sianaki;Omar Hussain;Azadeh Rajabian Tabesh

  • A granular computing-based approach to credit scoring modeling

    Morteza Saberi;Monireh Sadat Mirtalaie;Farookh Khadeer Hussain;Ali Azadeh

Frequent Co-Authors

Farookh Khadeer Hussain
Farookh Khadeer Hussain University of Technology Sydney
Elizabeth Chang
Elizabeth Chang Griffith University
Tharam S. Dillon
Tharam S. Dillon La Trobe University
Ali Azadeh
Ali Azadeh University of Tehran
Leonard Barolli
Leonard Barolli Fukuoka Institute of Technology
Martin J. Tobin
Martin J. Tobin Loyola University Chicago
Xiaopeng Li
Xiaopeng Li University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alex X. Liu
Alex X. Liu Michigan State University
Tomoya Enokido
Tomoya Enokido Rissho University
Yanchun Zhang
Yanchun Zhang Victoria University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to diverse online degree options, tailored to fit different interests and career goals. Many students start their journey by researching the cheapest online college bachelor degree programs. These affordable options help lower financial barriers while still providing a solid foundation in tech-related fields.

For those interested in specialized technical careers, pursuing engineering degrees online can provide flexibility and access to top programs regardless of location. Graduates can transition into high-demand roles across industries, including IT, robotics, and data science.

As your career progresses, advancing your education through an online executive mba can enhance your leadership and management skills—ideal for those aiming to move into tech management or executive roles.

Alternatively, tech-savvy students may consider related fields, such as library and information science. Exploring a library science degree online is excellent for those interested in managing digital resources, archives, or information systems.

Best Scientists Citing Omar Khadeer Hussain

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles