World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
86633
World Ranking
6349
National Ranking
3389

Richard Casaburi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Casaburi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 548 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard Casaburi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Casaburi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Casaburi is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, evidenced by 143 publications in this subfield. Additional areas of study include Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology, Complementary and Alternative Medicine, and Genetics.

The main topics of Casaburi's work include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Cardiovascular and Exercise Physiology, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Asthma and Respiratory Diseases, Cardiac Health and Mental Health, and Nutrition and Health in Aging.

Casaburi's frequent co-authors are:

  • Harry B. Rossiter
  • James D. Crapo
  • Elizabeth A. Regan
  • János Pórszász
  • William W. Stringer

The scientist has published extensively in several venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
  • Respiratory Medicine

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Casaburi include:

  • "Defining Modern Pulmonary Rehabilitation. An Official American Thoracic Society Workshop Report," 2021, Annals of the American Thoracic Society
  • "Clonal haematopoiesis and risk of chronic liver disease," 2023, Nature
  • "A high-resolution HLA reference panel capturing global population diversity enables multi-ancestry fine-mapping in HIV host response," 2021, Nature Genetics
  • "Virtual Reality Rehabilitation in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial," 2020, International Journal of COPD
  • "Objectively Measured Physical Activity in Patients with COPD: Recommendations from an International Task Force on Physical Activity," 2021, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Journal of the COPD Foundation

Best Publications

  • Standardisation of spirometry

    M. R. Miller;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

  • Interpretative strategies for lung function tests

    R Pellegrino;G Viegi;V Brusasco;R O Crapo

  • An official American thoracic society/European respiratory society statement: Key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation

    Martijn A. Spruit;Sally J. Singh;Chris Garvey;Richard ZuWallack

  • Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes

    Wanger J;Clausen Jl;Coates A;Pedersen Of

  • Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung

    N Macintyre;R O Crapo;G Viegi;D C Johnson

  • General considerations for lung function testing.

    M. R. Miller;R. Crapo;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco

  • Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999.

    Crapo Ro;Casaburi R;Coates Al;Enright Pl

  • The effects of supraphysiologic doses of testosterone on muscle size and strength in normal men.

    Shalender Bhasin;Thomas W. Storer;Nancy Berman;Carlos Callegari

  • Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Joint ACCP/AACVPR Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Andrew L. Ries;Gerene S. Bauldoff;Brian W. Carlin;Richard Casaburi

  • Azithromycin for Prevention of Exacerbations of COPD

    Richard K. Albert;Richard K. Albert;John Connett;William C. Bailey;Richard Casaburi

  • A long-term evaluation of once-daily inhaled tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    R Casaburi;D A Mahler;P W Jones;A Wanner

  • Testosterone dose-response relationships in healthy young men

    Shalender Bhasin;Linda Woodhouse;Richard Casaburi;Atam B. Singh

  • Reductions in Exercise Lactic Acidosis and Ventilation as a Result of Exercise Training in Patients with Obstructive Lung Disease

    Richard Casaburi;Antonio Patessio;Franco Ioli;Silvio Zanaboni

  • An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: update on limb muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    François Maltais;Marc Decramer;Richard Casaburi;Esther Barreiro

  • Recommendations on the use of exercise testing in clinical practice

    P Palange;S A Ward;K-H Carlsen;R Casaburi

  • Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Thierry Troosters;Richard Casaburi;Rik Gosselink;Marc Decramer

  • Testosterone Replacement Increases Fat-Free Mass and Muscle Size in Hypogonadal Men

    S Bhasin;T W Storer;N Berman;K E Yarasheski

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 2 in this Series Standardisation of spirometry

    J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos;R. Casaburi

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 1 in this Series General considerations for lung function testing

    R. Crapo;J. Hankinson;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

  • SERIES ''ATS/ERS TASK FORCE: STANDARDISATION OF LUNG FUNCTION TESTING'' Edited by V. Brusasco, R. Crapo and G. Viegi Number 4 in this Series Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung

    N. MacIntyre;G. Viegi;V. Brusasco;F. Burgos

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry J. Make
Barry J. Make National Jewish Health
Karlman Wasserman
Karlman Wasserman Lundquist Institute
Mark T. Dransfield
Mark T. Dransfield University of Alabama at Birmingham
Edwin K. Silverman
Edwin K. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital
John E. Hokanson
John E. Hokanson University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Frank C. Sciurba
Frank C. Sciurba University of Pittsburgh
George R. Washko
George R. Washko Brigham and Women's Hospital
François Maltais
François Maltais Université Laval
James D. Crapo
James D. Crapo National Jewish Health
MeiLan K. Han
MeiLan K. Han University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean attending a traditional MD program. There are many online healthcare administration degree options that open doors to vital non-clinical roles in medical facilities, focusing on leadership and organizational skills.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, adn to np bridge programs help streamline the path to becoming a nurse practitioner. These programs are designed for those with an ADN wishing to earn a master’s degree and move into advanced practice.

Nutrition is another fast-growing field in healthcare. An online bs in nutrition offers specialized study for those interested in dietary science and wellness careers, providing flexibility for both traditional students and working professionals.

Choosing the right program is essential. Learning how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs can guide you in finding a high-quality education that matches your career goals. Thorough research into accreditation, curriculum, and outcomes is crucial for your long-term success in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Casaburi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles