World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
31324
World Ranking
12167
National Ranking
454

Stefano Nava publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Nava sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 531 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stefano Nava D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefano Nava sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefano Nava is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy and has contributed extensively to research in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Immunology and Microbiology, and Medicine. Their work spans a broad range of topics related to parasitology, vector-borne diseases, and insect science. Nava's research interests are reflected in their focus on parasitology, insect science, infectious diseases, ecology, evolution, and public health.

The scientist has produced a significant number of publications covering various main topics, including:

  • Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Viral infections and vectors
  • Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences
  • Insect and pesticide research
  • Study of mite species
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Insect pest control strategies

Some of Nava's frequent co-authors include:

  • Patrick Sébastian
  • José M. Venzal
  • Nicolás Morel
  • Evelina L. Tarragona
  • Alberto A. Guglielmone

The main publication venues where Nava has contributed the most are:

  • Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
  • Experimental and Applied Acarology
  • Veterinary Parasitology Regional Studies and Reports
  • Medical and Veterinary Entomology
  • Parasitology Research

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Stefano Nava provide insight into their specific research areas. These include:

  • "Geographic distribution of the hard ticks (Acari: Ixodida: Ixodidae) of the world by countries and territories," 2023, published in Zootaxa
  • "Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Amblyomma ovale, comparative analyses and phylogenetic considerations," 2020, published in Experimental and Applied Acarology
  • "Phylogenetic relationships of the Amblyomma cajennense complex (Acari: Ixodidae) at mitogenomic resolution," 2023, published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases
  • "Resistance of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus to ivermectin in Argentina," 2020, published in Research in Veterinary Science
  • "Ornithodoros cerradoensis n. sp. (Acari: Argasidae), a member of the Ornithodoros talaje (Guérin-Méneville, 1849) group, parasite of rodents in the Brazilian Savannah," 2020, published in Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases

Nava's research contributes to understanding the biology, systematics, and control of arthropod vectors and parasites, focusing on ticks and related mite species. Their work integrates molecular techniques such as mitochondrial genome characterization with ecological and phylogenetic studies.

The spectrum of studies conducted by Nava engages with the dynamics of infectious diseases transmission, resistance to pesticides, and the interaction between vectors and their environments, offering insights relevant to agricultural and public health concerns.

Best Publications

  • Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

    Bram Rochwerg;Laurent Brochard;Laurent Brochard;Mark W. Elliott;Dean Hess

  • Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation for Respiratory Failure after Extubation

    Andrés Esteban;Fernando Frutos-Vivar;Niall D. Ferguson;Yaseen Arabi

  • Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Weaning of Patients with Respiratory Failure Due to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Stefano Nava;Nicolino Ambrosino;Enrico Clini;Maurizio Prato

  • Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

    Stefano Nava;Nicholas Hill

  • Physiotherapy for adult patients with critical illness: recommendations of the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Task Force on Physiotherapy for Critically Ill Patients.

    Rik Gosselink;Julia Bott;Michael R Johnson;Elizabeth Dean

  • Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for the treatment of severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled clinical trial

    Thomas Köhnlein;Wolfram Windisch;Dieter Köhler;Anna Drabik

  • Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients

    Stefano Nava;Cesare Gregoretti;Francesco Fanfulla;Enzo Squadrone

  • Pathophysiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multicentre prospective observational study.

    Giacomo Grasselli;Giacomo Grasselli;Tommaso Tonetti;Alessandro Protti;Thomas Langer

  • The application of esophageal pressure measurement in patients with respiratory failure.

    E Akoumianaki;Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore;F Valenza;G Bellani

  • Non-invasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure due to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: correlates for success.

    N. Ambrosino;K. Foglio;F. Rubini;Enrico Clini

  • Noninvasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a multicenter randomized trial.

    Stefano Nava;Giorgio Carbone;Nicola DiBattista;Andrea Bellone

  • Physiologic evaluation of noninvasive mechanical ventilation delivered with three types of masks in patients with chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure.

    Paolo Navalesi;Francesco Fanfulla;Pamela Frigerio;Cesare Gregoretti

  • Protecting healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2 infection: practical indications.

    Martina Ferioli;Cecilia Cisternino;Cecilia Cisternino;Valentina Leo;Valentina Leo;Lara Pisani

  • Incidence and causes of non-invasive mechanical ventilation failure after initial success

    Maurizio Moretti;Carmela Cilione;Auro Tampieri;Claudio Fracchia

  • Risk Factors for Extubation Failure in Patients Following a Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Fernando Frutos-Vivar;Niall D. Ferguson;Andrés Esteban;Scott K. Epstein

  • Rehabilitation of patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit

    Stefano Nava

  • Use of high-flow nasal cannula oxygenation in ICU adults: a narrative review.

    Laurent Papazian;Amanda Corley;Dean Hess;John F. Fraser

  • Non-invasive modalities of positive pressure ventilation improve the outcome of acute exacerbations in COLD patients.

    M. Vitacca;F. Rubini;K. Foglio;S. Scalvini

  • Palliative use of non-invasive ventilation in end-of-life patients with solid tumours: a randomised feasibility trial

    Stefano Nava;Miguel Ferrer;Antonio Esquinas;Raffaele Scala

  • Timing of noninvasive ventilation failure: causes, risk factors, and potential remedies

    Ezgi Ozyilmaz;Aylin Ozsancak Ugurlu;Stefano Nava

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas S. Hill
Nicholas S. Hill Tufts Medical Center
Laurent Brochard
Laurent Brochard St. Michael's Hospital
Christian Brun-Buisson
Christian Brun-Buisson Institut Pasteur
Paolo Pelosi
Paolo Pelosi University of Genoa
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Stefano Aliberti
Stefano Aliberti Humanitas University
Francesco Blasi
Francesco Blasi University of Milan
Elie Azoulay
Elie Azoulay Université Paris Cité
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Antonio Anzueto
Antonio Anzueto The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t have to mean following the traditional path of medical school. Many related online degrees provide alternative ways to enter the healthcare field or advance your career in allied roles.

For those looking to start quickly, consider 6 month lpn program online options. These programs offer a fast track to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse, allowing you to begin working in healthcare while continuing your education later.

If mental health is your passion, there are excellent psych np online programs leading to advanced practice roles in psychiatric nursing. These programs combine flexibility with rigorous training, preparing you for specialized patient care.

Interested in administration? The cheapest online healthcare administration degree programs can teach you essential management skills without a hefty price tag, making leadership roles more accessible.

For further advancement, a master's in healthcare administration online can propel your career, opening doors to executive positions in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

These flexible online pathways offer specialized training, affordable tuition, and the opportunity to make a real impact in healthcare outside the typical MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Stefano Nava

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles