World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
31729
World Ranking
14468
National Ranking
7316

Nicholas S. Hill publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas S. Hill sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 451 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas S. Hill D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas S. Hill sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nicholas S. Hill is affiliated with Tufts Medical Center in the United States and has a research focus within the field of medicine, particularly in pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their scholarly output demonstrates significant engagement with various aspects of respiratory and cardiovascular health.

Their research spans several subfields, including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, emergency medicine, critical care and intensive care medicine, and physiology. This multidisciplinary approach highlights a comprehensive interest in both respiratory and cardiovascular systems as well as acute care settings.

Key topics that characterize their work involve pulmonary hypertension research and treatments, respiratory support and mechanisms, cardiovascular function and risk factors, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, and cardiovascular issues in pregnancy. These topics indicate a consistent focus on understanding respiratory diseases and their intersection with cardiovascular health and critical care.

Their publication record includes papers published in a range of reputable journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • CHEST Journal
  • Pulmonary Circulation
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Respiratory Care
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Nicholas S. Hill are:

  • "High-Flow, Noninvasive Ventilation and Awake (Nonintubation) Proning in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Respiratory Failure," 2020, CHEST Journal
  • "The Usefulness of Chest CT Imaging in Patients With Suspected or Diagnosed COVID-19," 2021, CHEST Journal
  • "Clinical Characteristics and Transplant-Free Survival Across the Spectrum of Pulmonary Vascular Disease," 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Rare variant analysis of 4241 pulmonary arterial hypertension cases from an international consortium implicates FBLN2, PDGFD, and rare de novo variants in PAH," 2021, Genome Medicine
  • "Abatacept, Cenicriviroc, or Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia," 2023, JAMA

Nicholas S. Hill has collaborated frequently with a core group of researchers, which includes:

  • Robert P. Frantz
  • Anna R. Hemnes
  • Franz Rischard
  • Evelyn M. Horn
  • Jane A. Leopold

Best Publications

  • Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure

    Bram Rochwerg;Laurent Brochard;Laurent Brochard;Mark W. Elliott;Dean Hess

  • Continuous intravenous epoprostenol for pulmonary hypertension due to the scleroderma spectrum of disease. A randomized, controlled trial.

    David B. Badesch;Victor F. Tapson;Michael D. McGoon;Bruce H. Brundage

  • Randomized, prospective trial of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in acute respiratory failure.

    Naomi Kramer;Thomas J. Meyer;Joseph Meharg;Richard D. Cece

  • Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation for Respiratory Failure after Extubation

    Andrés Esteban;Fernando Frutos-Vivar;Niall D. Ferguson;Yaseen Arabi

  • Echocardiographic predictors of adverse outcomes in primary pulmonary hypertension

    Ronald J. Raymond;Alan L Hinderliter;Park W Willis;David Ralph

  • Sitaxsentan therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Robyn J. Barst;David Langleben;Adaani Frost;Evelyn M. Horn

  • Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

    Stefano Nava;Nicholas Hill

  • Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continuous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema

    Sangeeta Mehta;Gregory D. Jay;Robert H. Woolard;Rene A. Hipona

  • Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU

    Jean Carlet;Lambertus G. Thijs;Massimo Antonelli;Joan Cassell

  • Which patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease benefit from noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation: a systematic review of the literature

    Sean P. Keenan;Tasnim Sinuff;Deborah J. Cook;Nicholas S. Hill

  • Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events*

    Shelley S. Magill;Michael Klompas;Robert Balk;Robert Balk;Suzanne M. Burns;Suzanne M. Burns

  • Risk Factors for Extubation Failure in Patients Following a Successful Spontaneous Breathing Trial

    Fernando Frutos-Vivar;Niall D. Ferguson;Andrés Esteban;Scott K. Epstein

  • Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Oxygen in Adults: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Implications

    Giulia Spoletini;Mona Alotaibi;Francesco Blasi;Nicholas S. Hill

  • Nocturnal positive-pressure ventilation via nasal mask in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

    David A. Strumpf;Richard P. Millman;Carol C. Carlisle;Lynn M. Grattan

  • Pulmonary complications of chronic neuromuscular diseases and their management.

    Christophe Perrin;John N. Unterborn;Carolyn D' Ambrosio;Nicholas S. Hill

  • Adverse environmental conditions in the respiratory and medical ICU settings

    Thomas J. Meyer;Scott E. Eveloff;Mark S. Bauer;William A. Schwartz

  • Does noninvasive positive pressure ventilation improve outcome in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure? A systematic review.

    Sean P. Keenan;Tasnim Sinuff;Deborah J. Cook;Nicholas S. Hill

  • Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: executive summary.

    B Taylor Thompson;Peter N. Cox;Massimo Antonelli;Jean M. Carlet

  • Environmental noise as a cause of sleep disruption in an intermediate respiratory care unit.

    Joshua N. Aaron;Carol C. Carlisle;Mary A. Carskadon;Thomas J. Meyer

  • Which Patients with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Benefit from Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation?

    Sean P. Keenan;Tasnim Sinuff;Deborah J. Cook;Nicholas S. Hill

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry L. Fanburg
Barry L. Fanburg Tufts Medical Center
Stefano Nava
Stefano Nava University of Bologna
David B. Badesch
David B. Badesch University of Colorado Denver
Mitchell M. Levy
Mitchell M. Levy Brown University
David D. Gutterman
David D. Gutterman Medical College of Wisconsin
Sangeeta Mehta
Sangeeta Mehta University of Toronto
Marin H. Kollef
Marin H. Kollef Washington University in St. Louis
Paul M. Hassoun
Paul M. Hassoun Johns Hopkins University
Victor F. Tapson
Victor F. Tapson Duke University
Deborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to traditional medical school can open many doors in healthcare. For those interested in advanced research or academic positions, pursuing a phd in nursing online offers flexibility and affordability. This route is ideal if you envision a career shaping the next generation of healthcare professionals or leading impactful research.

Registered nurses looking to further their education and career prospects may benefit from enrolling in the cheapest rn to bsn program. These programs are designed to be accessible, often allowing students to continue working while earning their degree.

Individuals from non-nursing backgrounds interested in entering the nursing field can fast-track their careers through direct entry msn programs online. These programs allow a swift transition to advanced nursing roles, combining foundational nursing education with graduate-level coursework.

Additionally, for prospective students concerned about admission requirements, identifying the easiest nursing schools to get into can make starting your healthcare career more attainable. With these options, a wide range of pathways are available to fit many backgrounds and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas S. Hill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles