World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 12964 12200 6628 6129 417 37869

David D. Gutterman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David D. Gutterman between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David D. Gutterman published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2006. 9 of the 425 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2006. 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 27 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 23 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 21 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 6 publications
1986 2025

425 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David D. Gutterman: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 4
1993 3
1994 2
1995 5
1996 1
1997 6
1998 5
1999 4
2000 5
2001 6
2002 8
2003 19
2004 5
2005 18
2006 27
2007 21
2008 17
2009 23
2010 14
2011 16
2012 24
2013 21
2014 15
2015 10
2016 20
2017 20
2018 17
2019 22
2020 13
2021 16
2022 14
2023 5
2024 3
2025 6
Total 425
Download as CSV

David D. Gutterman publications per year - data summary

  • David D. Gutterman, a Medicine scholar from Medical College of Wisconsin, has 425 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2006, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1990 and 1996, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 40 years in the span carries no publications at all (1988).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 10.9 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 44 publications, 10% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 40 publications (2.9 per year); 2000-2013: 224 publications (16.0 per year); 2014-2025: 161 publications (13.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

David D. Gutterman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Gutterman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 417 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 417
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David D. Gutterman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • David D. Gutterman, a Medicine scholar from Medical College of Wisconsin, records 417 publications - the 42nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 42% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than David D. Gutterman, and about 58% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and David D. Gutterman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

David D. Gutterman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David D. Gutterman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

David D. Gutterman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • David D. Gutterman, a Medicine scholar from Medical College of Wisconsin, records 88 D-Index - the 36th percentile of the discipline.
  • 36% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than David D. Gutterman, and about 64% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and David D. Gutterman ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

David D. Gutterman is affiliated with the Medical College of Wisconsin in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly contributions encompass a broad range of cardiovascular-related topics and interdisciplinary areas such as Molecular Biology, Epidemiology, Physiology, and Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health.

Their main research topics include:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy

Gutterman's work appears in a range of publication venues, with multiple contributions to leading journals such as:

  • The FASEB Journal
  • American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • Basic Research in Cardiology
  • Microvascular Research
  • Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology

Recent scholarly articles authored or co-authored by Gutterman illustrate their diverse focus on vascular health and dysfunction:

  • "Vascular Dysfunction in Preeclampsia" (2021), published in Cells
  • "Guidelines for the measurement of vascular function and structure in isolated arteries and veins" (2021), published in American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • "Endothelial dysfunction as a complication of anti-cancer therapy" (2022), published in Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • "Vascular autophagy in health and disease" (2020), published in Basic Research in Cardiology
  • "Is microvascular dysfunction a systemic disorder with common biomarkers found in the heart, brain, and kidneys? - A scoping review" (2020), published in Microvascular Research

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Andreas Beyer
  • Shelby Hader
  • William E. Hughes
  • Julie K. Freed
  • Matthew J. Durand

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Executive Summary : Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Elie A. Akl;Elie A. Akl;Mark Crowther;David D. Gutterman

  • Grading Strength of Recommendations and Quality of Evidence in Clinical Guidelines: Report From an American College of Chest Physicians Task Force

    Gordon Guyatt;David Gutterman;Michael H. Baumann;Doreen Addrizzo-Harris

  • Screening, Early Detection, and Diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Michael McGoon;David Gutterman;Virginia Steen;Robin Barst

  • Superoxide Production in Vascular Smooth Muscle Contributes to Oxidative Stress and Impaired Relaxation in Atherosclerosis

    Miller Fj;Gutterman Dd;Rios Cd;Heistad Dd

  • Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Per Olav Vandvik;A. Michael Lincoff;Joel M. Gore;David D. Gutterman

  • Role for Hydrogen Peroxide in Flow-Induced Dilation of Human Coronary Arterioles

    Hiroto Miura;John J. Bosnjak;Gang Ning;Takashi Saito

  • Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species-mediated signaling in endothelial cells

    David X. Zhang;David D. Gutterman

  • Developing a New, National Approach to Surveillance for Ventilator-Associated Events*

    Shelley S. Magill;Michael Klompas;Robert Balk;Robert Balk;Suzanne M. Burns;Suzanne M. Burns

  • Mitochondrial Sources of H2O2 Generation Play a Key Role in Flow-Mediated Dilation in Human Coronary Resistance Arteries

    Yanping Liu;Hongtao Zhao;Hongwei Li;B. Kalyanaraman

  • TRPV4-mediated endothelial Ca2+ influx and vasodilation in response to shear stress.

    Suelhem A. Mendoza;Juan Fang;David D. Gutterman;David A. Wilcox

  • The Vexing Problem of Guidelines and Conflict of Interest: A Potential Solution

    Gordon Guyatt;Elie A Akl;Jack Hirsh;Clive Kearon

  • Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Elie A. Akl;Mark Crowther;David D. Gutterman

  • Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Susan L. Norris;Sam Schulman;Jack Hirsh

  • Flow-Induced Dilation of Human Coronary Arterioles Important Role of Ca2+-Activated K+ Channels

    Hiroto Miura;Ruth E. Wachtel;Yanping Liu;Fausto R. Loberiza

  • Epidemiology, mechanisms, and risks: American College of Chest Physicians guidelines for the prevention and management of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery.

    Charles W. Hogue;Lawrence L. Creswell;David D. Gutterman;Lee A. Fleisher

  • The Human Microcirculation Regulation of Flow and Beyond

    David D. Gutterman;Dawid S. Chabowski;Andrew O. Kadlec;Matthew J. Durand

  • Acquired microvascular dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease: Loss of nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation.

    Ossama A Hatoum;David G Binion;Mary F Otterson;David D Gutterman

  • Prevalence of the female athlete triad in high school athletes and sedentary students.

    Anne Z Hoch;Nicholas M Pajewski;Luann Moraski;Guillermo F Carrera

  • Introduction to the Ninth Edition: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Elie A. Akl;Mark Crowther;Holger J. Schünemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Mitchell M. Levy
Mitchell M. Levy Brown University
Marin H. Kollef
Marin H. Kollef Washington University in St. Louis
Parameswaran Hari
Parameswaran Hari Medical College of Wisconsin
William B. Campbell
William B. Campbell Medical College of Wisconsin
Michael Klompas
Michael Klompas Brigham and Women's Hospital
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
Brian D. Schmit
Brian D. Schmit Marquette University
Gerald F. Gebhart
Gerald F. Gebhart University of Pittsburgh
Elie A. Akl
Elie A. Akl American University of Beirut
Daniel J. Diekema
Daniel J. Diekema University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of healthcare roles, many of which can also be reached through flexible online degree programs. For those interested in the pharmaceutical field, online pharmacy programs provide a cost-effective and accessible pathway to become a Doctor of Pharmacy without relocating.

If you are seeking roles focused on managing medical data and records, earning an online rhit degree program can qualify you for health information management positions—essential for the smooth operation of clinics and hospitals.

Another option is pursuing medical coding certification online, which prepares students for in-demand jobs in medical billing and coding. These roles offer strong remote work opportunities and rapid entry into the healthcare workforce.

Nursing is a cornerstone of healthcare, and the cheapest online fnp program allows Registered Nurses to advance their careers and become Family Nurse Practitioners with greater affordability and flexibility than traditional nursing schools.

Best Scientists Citing David D. Gutterman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles