World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Psychology
USA
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
144
Citations
71641
World Ranking
98
National Ranking
56

Nathan A. Fox publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Fox sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 632 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nathan A. Fox D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan A. Fox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 144 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in United States Leader Award
  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Nathan A. Fox is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a concentration of 197 publications. Within this domain, notable subfields include Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, such as:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies

Recent notable papers by Nathan A. Fox include:

  • "The impact of a poverty reduction intervention on infant brain activity" (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Single-cell RNA sequencing of developing maize ears facilitates functional analysis and trait candidate gene discovery" (2021), published in Developmental Cell
  • "Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: a systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development" (2020), published in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • "The Maryland analysis of developmental EEG (MADE) pipeline" (2020), published in Psychophysiology
  • "Infant behavioral inhibition predicts personality and social outcomes three decades later" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The frequent coauthors collaborating with Nathan A. Fox include:

  • Charles A. Nelson
  • Charles H. Zeanah
  • Santiago Morales
  • Daniel S. Pine
  • George A. Buzzell

Their publications appear frequently in several academic venues, including:

  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (14 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (12 publications)
  • Development and Psychopathology (9 publications)
  • Developmental Science (9 publications)
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (9 publications)

Nathan A. Fox has a book published with Cambridge University Press titled The Cambridge Handbook of Infant Development (2020), which has been cited in academic literature.

The scientist has been recognized with awards such as Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 2014 and Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Cognition assessment using the NIH Toolbox

    Sandra Weintraub;Sureyya S. Dikmen;Robert K. Heaton;David S. Tulsky

  • Behavioral Inhibition: Linking Biology and Behavior within a Developmental Framework

    Nathan A. Fox;Heather A. Henderson;Peter J. Marshall;Kate E. Nichols

  • Cognitive Recovery in Socially Deprived Young Children: The Bucharest Early Intervention Project

    Charles A. Nelson;Charles H. Zeanah;Nathan A. Fox;Peter J. Marshall

  • Continuity and Discontinuity of Behavioral Inhibition and Exuberance: Psychophysiological and Behavioral Influences across the First Four Years of Life.

    Nathan A. Fox;Heather A. Henderson;Kenneth H. Rubin;Susan D. Calkins

  • Attention Bias Modification Treatment: A Meta-Analysis Toward the Establishment of Novel Treatment for Anxiety

    Yuko Hakamata;Shmuel Lissek;Yair Bar-Haim;Jennifer C. Britton

  • Asymmetrical brain activity discriminates between positive and negative affective stimuli in human infants

    Richard J. Davidson;Nathan A. Fox

  • NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function

    Richard C. Gershon;Molly V. Wagster;Hugh C. Hendrie;Nathan A. Fox

  • Self-regulatory processes in early personality development: A multilevel approach to the study of childhood social withdrawal and aggression.

    Susan D. Calkins;Nathan A. Fox

  • Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts.

    R. T. Pivik;R. J. Broughton;R. Coppola;R. J. Davidson

  • The development of self-control of emotion: Intrinsic and extrinsic influences.

    Nathan A. Fox;Susan D. Calkins

  • Attachment to mother/attachment to father: A meta-analysis.

    Nathan A. Fox;Nancy L. Kimmerly;William D. Schafer

  • Social Perception in Infants

    Tiffany Field;Nathan A. Fox

  • Development of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age

    Peter J Marshall;Yair Bar-Haim;Nathan A Fox

  • Frontal brain asymmetry predicts infants' response to maternal separation.

    Richard J. Davidson;Nathan A. Fox

  • If it's not left, it's right. Electroencephalograph asymmetry and the development of emotion.

    Nathan A. Fox

  • Emotionality, emotion regulation, and preschoolers' social adaptation

    Kenneth H. Rubin;Robert J. Coplan;Nathan A. Fox;Susan D. Calkins

  • Stable Early Maternal Report of Behavioral Inhibition Predicts Lifetime Social Anxiety Disorder in Adolescence

    Andrea Chronis-Tuscano;Kathryn Amey Degnan;Daniel S. Pine;Koraly Perez-Edgar

  • Behavioral and Physiological Antecedents of Inhibited and Uninhibited Behavior

    Susan D. Calkins;Nathan A. Fox;Timothy R. Marshall

  • Being alone, playing alone and acting alone: Distinguishing among reticence, and passive- and active-solitude in young children.

    Robert J. Coplan;Kenneth H. Rubin;Nathan A. Fox;Susan D. Calkins

  • The development of emotion regulation : biological and behavioral considerations

    Nathan A. Fox;Joseph J. Campos

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles A. Nelson
Charles A. Nelson Boston Children's Hospital
Charles H. Zeanah
Charles H. Zeanah Tulane University
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Heather A. Henderson
Heather A. Henderson University of Waterloo
Kathryn A. Degnan
Kathryn A. Degnan Catholic University of America
Koraly Pérez-Edgar
Koraly Pérez-Edgar Pennsylvania State University
Yair Bar-Haim
Yair Bar-Haim Tel Aviv University
Peter J. Marshall
Peter J. Marshall Temple University
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Louis A. Schmidt
Louis A. Schmidt McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue specialties such as marriage and family therapy (MFT), which is in demand nationwide. If you are interested in learning how to become a marriage and family therapist in Omaha, for example, you will find specific educational and state licensing requirements to follow.

Requirements vary by location. For instance, you can explore mft requirements in Orlando, which may differ from those in Pennsylvania or Arizona. Each state features unique credentialing standards and supervised clinical experience hours. Those considering practice in the Northeast can review mft requirements in Philadelphia. In contrast, those aiming for careers in the Southwest should check the mft requirements in Phoenix.

With flexible online degrees and diverse career opportunities, a background in psychology empowers you to make a difference in communities across the nation.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan A. Fox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles