World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
73
Citations
36907
World Ranking
1999
National Ranking
909

Christa Lese Martin publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christa Lese Martin sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 171 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Christa Lese Martin D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christa Lese Martin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christa Lese Martin is affiliated with the Geisinger Health System in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with substantial work in Medicine. The main subfields emphasized include Genetics, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

The core topics that characterize their research account for Genomics and Rare Diseases, Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Genetic factors in colorectal cancer, Autism Spectrum Disorder Research, and BRCA gene mutations in cancer.

Christa Lese Martin has contributed numerous papers to academic literature, including significant publications in the journal Genetics in Medicine. Notable recent papers are:

  • ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • ACMG SF v3.2 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2023, Genetics in Medicine
  • ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2022, Genetics in Medicine
  • Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • Insufficient Evidence for "Autism-Specific" Genes, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as Genetics in Medicine, UNC Libraries, Genetics in Medicine Open, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), and JAMA. These publication venues show a consistent engagement with journals that focus on genetics, genomics, and medical research.

Collaboration forms a significant element of their research output. Frequent co-authors include David H. Ledbetter, Erin Rooney Riggs, Matthew T. Oetjens, Scott M. Myers, and David T. Miller. The recurring collaborations indicate a multidisciplinary approach within the genetics and genomics research community.

Best Publications

  • Consensus Statement : Chromosomal Microarray Is a First-Tier Clinical Diagnostic Test for Individuals with Developmental Disabilities or Congenital Anomalies

    David T. Miller;Margaret P. Adam;Margaret P. Adam;Swaroop Aradhya;Leslie G. Biesecker

  • ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing

    Robert C. Green;Robert C. Green;Jonathan S. Berg;Wayne W. Grody;Sarah S. Kalia

  • Genetic relationship between five psychiatric disorders estimated from genome-wide SNPs

    S. Hong Lee;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Stephen V. Faraone

  • Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

    Sarah S. Kalia;Kathy Adelman;Sherri J. Bale;Wendy K. Chung

  • Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis

    Ronald J. Wapner;Christa Lese Martin;Brynn Levy;Blake C. Ballif

  • Insights into Autism Spectrum Disorder Genomic Architecture and Biology from 71 Risk Loci.

    Stephan J. Sanders;Xin He;A. Jeremy Willsey;A. Gulhan Ercan-Sencicek

  • Multiple Recurrent De Novo CNVs, Including Duplications of the 7q11.23 Williams Syndrome Region, Are Strongly Associated with Autism

    Stephan J. Sanders;A. Gulhan Ercan-Sencicek;Vanessa Hus;Rui Luo

  • Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen).

    Erin Rooney Riggs;Erica F. Andersen;Erica F. Andersen;Athena M. Cherry;Sibel Kantarci

  • ClinGen — The Clinical Genome Resource

    Heidi L. Rehm;Jonathan S. Berg;Lisa D. Brooks;Carlos D. Bustamante

  • Linkage, Association, and Gene-Expression Analyses Identify CNTNAP2 as an Autism-Susceptibility Gene

    Maricela Alarcón;Brett S. Abrahams;Jennifer L. Stone;Jacqueline A. Duvall

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data

    Sebastian Köhler;Sandra C. Doelken;Christopher J. Mungall;Sebastian Bauer

  • Meta-analysis of GWAS of over 16,000 individuals with autism spectrum disorder highlights a novel locus at 10q24.32 and a significant overlap with schizophrenia

    Richard J.L. Anney;Richard J.L. Anney;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Verneri Anttila;Jakob Grove;Jakob Grove

  • Psychiatric genome-wide association study analyses implicate neuronal, immune and histone pathways

    Colm O'Dushlaine;Lizzy Rossin;Phil H. Lee;Laramie Duncan;Laramie Duncan

  • Meta-analysis and multidisciplinary consensus statement: exome sequencing is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Siddharth Srivastava;Jamie A. Love-Nichols;Kira A. Dies;David H. Ledbetter

  • An evidence-based approach to establish the functional and clinical significance of copy number variants in intellectual and developmental disabilities.

    Erin B. Kaminsky;Vineith Kaul;Justin Paschall;Deanna M. Church

  • Evaluating the Clinical Validity of Gene-Disease Associations: An Evidence-Based Framework Developed by the Clinical Genome Resource

    Natasha T. Strande;Erin Rooney Riggs;Adam H. Buchanan;Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy

  • Common genetic variants, acting additively, are a major source of risk for autism

    Lambertus Klei;Stephan J Sanders;Michael T Murtha;Vanessa Hus

  • Correction to: ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

    David T. Miller;Kristy Lee;Wendy K. Chung;Adam S. Gordon

  • Subtelomere FISH analysis of 11 688 cases: an evaluation of the frequency and pattern of subtelomere rearrangements in individuals with developmental disabilities

    J B Ravnan;J H Tepperberg;P Papenhausen;A N Lamb

  • Linkage, Association, and Gene-Expression Analyses Identify CNTNAP2 as an Autism-Susceptibility Gene. Commentary

    Dietrich A. Stephan;Maricela Alarcon;Brett S. Abrahams;Jennifer L. Stone

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Ledbetter
David H. Ledbetter University of Florida
Heidi L. Rehm
Heidi L. Rehm Brigham and Women's Hospital
Daniel H. Geschwind
Daniel H. Geschwind University of California, Los Angeles
Wendy K. Chung
Wendy K. Chung Columbia University
Christopher A. Walsh
Christopher A. Walsh Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Raphael Bernier
Raphael Bernier University of Washington
Arthur L. Beaudet
Arthur L. Beaudet Baylor College of Medicine
Edwin H. Cook
Edwin H. Cook University of Illinois at Chicago
Matthew W. State
Matthew W. State University of California, San Francisco
Jonathan S. Berg
Jonathan S. Berg University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA opens doors to a range of healthcare careers and online degree options. Many students combine genetics studies with flexible online programs to fit education around life’s demands. For those already holding an RN license, rn to bsn programs no clinicals offer a way to advance your nursing degree with minimal in-person requirements, ideal for working professionals.

Nursing professionals seeking a terminal degree might consider the shortest dnp programs online or the msn to dnp programs. These pathways allow for expedited study and can fast-track your qualifications in less time, supporting careers in genetics research, policy, or advanced clinical practice.

If you are eager to enter the healthcare field quickly, medical assistant programs accelerated can open new doors in as little as six weeks. Each of these online options provides versatile routes into genetics and related healthcare careers, letting you grow your expertise while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Christa Lese Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles