World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
11180
World Ranking
6591
National Ranking
58

Dan Zakay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan Zakay sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Dan Zakay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dan Zakay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dan Zakay is affiliated with Reichman University in Israel and has contributed to research across multiple academic disciplines. Their work spans neuroscience, mathematics, and the arts and humanities, with particular attention to subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, and music.

Their recent research includes the paper titled The effect of magnitude in a simultaneous duration assessment task among children - a replication study published in 2023 in the journal PLoS ONE. This publication reflects their engagement with cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills and intersects with neuroscience and music perception.

Dan Zakay's studies frequently explore the following main topics:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Diverse Music Education Insights

Regarding collaboration, Dan Zakay has worked with coauthors such as Amihai Gottlieb.

Their research appears in venues including:

  • PLoS ONE

The interdisciplinary nature of their work is demonstrated by their involvement in multiple fields and topics, merging insights from neuroscience, cognitive science, and education with mathematical and musical studies.

Best Publications

  • Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay

  • How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Peter A. Hancock;Dan Zakay

  • The role of attention in time estimation processes

    Dan Zakay;Richard A. Block

  • Temporal Cognition

    Unknown

  • Chapter 10 Subjective Time and Attentional Resource Allocation: An Integrated Model of Time Estimation

    Dan Zakay

  • Human Aging and Duration Judgments: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay;Peter A. Hancock

  • Time and human cognition: A life-span perspective.

    Iris Levin;Dan Zakay

  • Time pressure, training and decision effectiveness.

    Dan Zakay;Stuart Wooler

  • A timely account of the role of duration in decision making.

    Dan Ariely;Dan Zakay

  • The evasive art of subjective time measurement: Some methodological dilemmas.

    Dan Zakay

  • When time slows down: The influence of threat on time perception in anxiety

    Yair Bar-Haim;Aya Kerem;Dominique Lamy;Dan Zakay

  • The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation

    Dan Zakay;Devora Nitzan;Joseph Glicksohn

  • Time estimation methods: Do they influence prospective duration estimates?

    Dan Zakay

  • Sex differences in duration judgments: A meta-analytic review

    Richard A. Block;Peter A. Hancock;D. A. N. Zakay

  • Developmental Changes in Human Duration Judgments: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Richard A. Block;Dan Zakay;Peter A. Hancock

  • Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective

    Unknown

  • The Impact of Time Perception Processes on Decision Making under Time Stress

    Dan Zakay

  • Decision making in action: Models and methods: Gary A. Klein, Judith Orasanu, Roberta Calderwood and Caroline E. Zsambok (Eds.), Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ, 1993

    Dan Zakay

  • Psychological time as information: the case of boredom.

    Dan Zakay;Dan Zakay

  • Individual differences in compensatory decision-making style and need for closure as correlates of subjective decision complexity and difficulty

    Shoshana Shiloh;Shelly Koren;Dan Zakay

  • The Impact of the Mode of Thought in Complex Decisions: Intuitive Decisions are Better

    Marius Usher;Zohar Russo;Mark Weyers;Ran Brauner

  • The Role of Attention in Children's Time Perception.

    Dan Zakay

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Block
Richard A. Block Montana State University
Marius Usher
Marius Usher Tel Aviv University
Peter A. Hancock
Peter A. Hancock University of Central Florida
Simon Grondin
Simon Grondin Université Laval
Joseph Glicksohn
Joseph Glicksohn Bar-Ilan University
Daniel Algom
Daniel Algom Tel Aviv University
Yair Bar-Haim
Yair Bar-Haim Tel Aviv University
Dominique Lamy
Dominique Lamy Tel Aviv University
Azy Barak
Azy Barak University of Haifa
Dan Ariely
Dan Ariely Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology can open the door to a variety of fulfilling roles in the mental health and social services fields. Many psychology graduates choose to pursue related online degrees, such as social work, to expand their career options. The educational requirements for becoming a social worker differ from state to state, which makes it essential to research your target location.

For example, if you plan to practice in North Dakota, you should learn about the North Dakota education requirements for social workers. Similarly, those interested in working in Ohio will benefit from understanding social worker education requirements in Ohio.

Oklahoma students must meet the Oklahoma minimum degree requirement for social workers, while those heading to the Pacific Northwest should review social worker education requirements in Oregon. These variations highlight the importance of selecting an accredited online degree that aligns with your chosen career path and state regulations.

Best Scientists Citing Dan Zakay

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles