World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5938 5521 43 41 119 9213
Neuroscience 50 5723 5267 244 222 130 9669

Franck Vidal publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Franck Vidal between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Franck Vidal published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 7.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2009. 12 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2009. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 8 publications
1991 2025

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Franck Vidal: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 0
1999 3
2000 2
2001 2
2002 7
2003 7
2004 11
2005 14
2006 6
2007 7
2008 15
2009 28
2010 16
2011 11
2012 8
2013 13
2014 9
2015 19
2016 8
2017 12
2018 6
2019 9
2020 13
2021 6
2022 3
2023 7
2024 4
2025 8
Total 263
Download as CSV

Franck Vidal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Vidal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 130
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Franck Vidal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Vidal sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425 50
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Franck Vidal is affiliated with Aix-Marseille University in France, focusing primarily on Computer Science with notable contributions across several subfields. Their research explores Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in their work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Data Visualization and Analytics, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Anatomy and Medical Technology, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Franck Vidal has published research in various venues, often in collaboration with numerous coauthors. Frequently appearing publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Eurographics

Frequent coauthors are:

  • Thierry Hasbroucq
  • Jean Michel Létang
  • Évelyne Lutton
  • Alfie Abdul-Rahman
  • Daniel Archambault

Key recent publications include:

  • "On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN," 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "RAMPVIS: Answering the challenges of building visualisation capabilities for large-scale emergency responses," 2022, Epidemics
  • "Visualization for epidemiological modelling: challenges, solutions, reflections and recommendations," 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "Interactive teaching environment for diagnostic radiography with real-time X-ray simulation and patient positioning," 2021, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • "Errors and Action Monitoring: Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile," 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation

    Jennifer T. Coull;Franck Vidal;Bruno Nazarian;Francoise Macar

  • Is the 'error negativity' specific to errors?

    F Vidal;T Hasbroucq;J Grapperon;M Bonnet

  • Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view

    Borís Burle;Laure Spieser;Clémence Roger;Laurence Casini

  • Action monitoring and medial frontal cortex: leading role of supplementary motor area.

    Francesca Bonini;Boris Burle;Boris Burle;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Jean Régis;Jean Régis

  • Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing.

    F. Macar;H. Lejeune;M. Bonnet;A. Ferrara

  • The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes.

    Françoise Macar;Franck Vidal;Laurence Casini

  • Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis.

    Borís Burle;Camille-Aimé Possamaï;Franck Vidal;Michel Bonnet

  • Brain activation induced by estimation of duration: a PET study.

    P. Maquet;H. Lejeune;V. Pouthas;M. Bonnet

  • Physiological Evidence for Response Inhibition in Choice Reaction Time Tasks.

    Borı́s Burle;Franck Vidal;Christophe Tandonnet;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Error negativity on correct trials: a reexamination of available data.

    Franck Vidal;Boris Burle;Michel Bonnet;Jacques Grapperon

  • Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network

    Jennifer T. Coull;Bruno Nazarian;Franck Vidal;Franck Vidal

  • The supplementary motor area in motor and perceptual time processing: fMRI studies.

    Françoise Macar;Jennifer T. Coull;Franck Vidal

  • Error negativity does not reflect conflict: A reappraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex activity

    Borís Burle;Clémence Roger;Sonia Allain;Franck Vidal

  • The dual nature of time preparation: neural activation and suppression revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

    Karen Davranche;Karen Davranche;Christophe Tandonnet;Christophe Tandonnet;Boris Burle;Chloé Meynier;Chloé Meynier

  • Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities

    Clémence Roger;Christian G. Bénar;Franck Vidal;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Event-Related Potentials as Indices of Time Processing: A Review

    Françoise Macar;Franck Vidal

  • Timing functions of the supplementary motor area: an event-related fMRI study.

    Françoise Macar;Jean-Luc Anton;Michel Bonnet;Franck Vidal

  • Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: A tms study

    Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg;Borís Burle;Franck Vidal;Maurits W. van der Molen

  • The CNV peak: An index of decision making and temporal memory

    Unknown

  • Room temperature ferromagnetism of Co doped CeO2−δ diluted magnetic oxide: Effect of oxygen and anisotropy

    B. Vodungbo;Y. Zheng;Franck Vidal;D. Demaille

  • The modulation of the Ne-like wave on correct responses foreshadows errors.

    Sonia Allain;Laurence Carbonnell;Michael Falkenstein;Borís Burle

Frequent Co-Authors

Thierry Hasbroucq
Thierry Hasbroucq Aix-Marseille University
Boris Burle
Boris Burle Aix-Marseille University
Jennifer T. Coull
Jennifer T. Coull Aix-Marseille University
Klaus Kern
Klaus Kern Max Planck Society
Nian Lin
Nian Lin Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Johannes V. Barth
Johannes V. Barth Technical University of Munich
Pascal Huguet
Pascal Huguet University of Clermont Auvergne
Marianne Amalric
Marianne Amalric Aix-Marseille University
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg University of Amsterdam
Quentin M. Ramasse
Quentin M. Ramasse University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of careers in health, research, and counseling. If you’re exploring related academic options online, consider programs in psychology, social work, and family therapy. These study routes provide foundational knowledge and flexible career possibilities.

For those seeking education at a lower cost, you might look for a cheap online psychology degree. Psychology degrees pair well with neuroscience for roles in mental health and research.

Social work is another rewarding path. Newcomers may be interested in the easiest online msw program, which can fast-track you into social services and support roles.

Advanced clinical practice is also possible. If you aim for a doctorate, explore psy d programs for training in therapeutic assessment and intervention. Alternatively, specialize in family support with one of the flexible online mft programs.

By combining neuroscience expertise with these allied fields, you’ll broaden your impact and expand your career opportunities in both clinical and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Franck Vidal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles