World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
9213
World Ranking
5938
National Ranking
43

Neuroscience

D-Index
50
Citations
9669
World Ranking
5723
National Ranking
244

Franck Vidal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Vidal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Franck Vidal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Franck Vidal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Franck Vidal is affiliated with Aix-Marseille University in France, focusing primarily on Computer Science with notable contributions across several subfields. Their research explores Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics covered in their work include Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Data Visualization and Analytics, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Anatomy and Medical Technology, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Franck Vidal has published research in various venues, often in collaboration with numerous coauthors. Frequently appearing publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Eurographics

Frequent coauthors are:

  • Thierry Hasbroucq
  • Jean Michel Létang
  • Évelyne Lutton
  • Alfie Abdul-Rahman
  • Daniel Archambault

Key recent publications include:

  • "On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN," 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • "RAMPVIS: Answering the challenges of building visualisation capabilities for large-scale emergency responses," 2022, Epidemics
  • "Visualization for epidemiological modelling: challenges, solutions, reflections and recommendations," 2022, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
  • "Interactive teaching environment for diagnostic radiography with real-time X-ray simulation and patient positioning," 2021, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
  • "Errors and Action Monitoring: Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile," 2020, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Functional Anatomy of the Attentional Modulation of Time Estimation

    Jennifer T. Coull;Franck Vidal;Bruno Nazarian;Francoise Macar

  • Is the 'error negativity' specific to errors?

    F Vidal;T Hasbroucq;J Grapperon;M Bonnet

  • Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view

    Borís Burle;Laure Spieser;Clémence Roger;Laurence Casini

  • Action monitoring and medial frontal cortex: leading role of supplementary motor area.

    Francesca Bonini;Boris Burle;Boris Burle;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Jean Régis;Jean Régis

  • Activation of the supplementary motor area and of attentional networks during temporal processing.

    F. Macar;H. Lejeune;M. Bonnet;A. Ferrara

  • The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes.

    Françoise Macar;Franck Vidal;Laurence Casini

  • Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis.

    Borís Burle;Camille-Aimé Possamaï;Franck Vidal;Michel Bonnet

  • Brain activation induced by estimation of duration: a PET study.

    P. Maquet;H. Lejeune;V. Pouthas;M. Bonnet

  • Physiological Evidence for Response Inhibition in Choice Reaction Time Tasks.

    Borı́s Burle;Franck Vidal;Christophe Tandonnet;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Error negativity on correct trials: a reexamination of available data.

    Franck Vidal;Boris Burle;Michel Bonnet;Jacques Grapperon

  • Timing, storage, and comparison of stimulus duration engage discrete anatomical components of a perceptual timing network

    Jennifer T. Coull;Bruno Nazarian;Franck Vidal;Franck Vidal

  • The supplementary motor area in motor and perceptual time processing: fMRI studies.

    Françoise Macar;Jennifer T. Coull;Franck Vidal

  • Error negativity does not reflect conflict: A reappraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex activity

    Borís Burle;Clémence Roger;Sonia Allain;Franck Vidal

  • The dual nature of time preparation: neural activation and suppression revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

    Karen Davranche;Karen Davranche;Christophe Tandonnet;Christophe Tandonnet;Boris Burle;Chloé Meynier;Chloé Meynier

  • Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities

    Clémence Roger;Christian G. Bénar;Franck Vidal;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Event-Related Potentials as Indices of Time Processing: A Review

    Françoise Macar;Franck Vidal

  • Timing functions of the supplementary motor area: an event-related fMRI study.

    Françoise Macar;Jean-Luc Anton;Michel Bonnet;Franck Vidal

  • Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: A tms study

    Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg;Borís Burle;Franck Vidal;Maurits W. van der Molen

  • The CNV peak: An index of decision making and temporal memory

    Unknown

  • Room temperature ferromagnetism of Co doped CeO2−δ diluted magnetic oxide: Effect of oxygen and anisotropy

    B. Vodungbo;Y. Zheng;Franck Vidal;D. Demaille

  • The modulation of the Ne-like wave on correct responses foreshadows errors.

    Sonia Allain;Laurence Carbonnell;Michael Falkenstein;Borís Burle

Frequent Co-Authors

Thierry Hasbroucq
Thierry Hasbroucq Aix-Marseille University
Boris Burle
Boris Burle Aix-Marseille University
Jennifer T. Coull
Jennifer T. Coull Aix-Marseille University
Klaus Kern
Klaus Kern Max Planck Society
Nian Lin
Nian Lin Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Johannes V. Barth
Johannes V. Barth Technical University of Munich
Pascal Huguet
Pascal Huguet University of Clermont Auvergne
Marianne Amalric
Marianne Amalric Aix-Marseille University
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg University of Amsterdam
Quentin M. Ramasse
Quentin M. Ramasse University of Leeds

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience opens doors to a diverse range of careers in health, research, and counseling. If you’re exploring related academic options online, consider programs in psychology, social work, and family therapy. These study routes provide foundational knowledge and flexible career possibilities.

For those seeking education at a lower cost, you might look for a cheap online psychology degree. Psychology degrees pair well with neuroscience for roles in mental health and research.

Social work is another rewarding path. Newcomers may be interested in the easiest online msw program, which can fast-track you into social services and support roles.

Advanced clinical practice is also possible. If you aim for a doctorate, explore psy d programs for training in therapeutic assessment and intervention. Alternatively, specialize in family support with one of the flexible online mft programs.

By combining neuroscience expertise with these allied fields, you’ll broaden your impact and expand your career opportunities in both clinical and research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Franck Vidal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles