World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6741 6281 59 57 122 7398

Boris Burle publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Boris Burle between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Boris Burle published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2005. 6 of the 137 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2005. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1997 2025

137 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Boris Burle: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 2
2004 6
2005 11
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 8
2010 6
2011 5
2012 7
2013 7
2014 8
2015 11
2016 9
2017 3
2018 7
2019 4
2020 5
2021 7
2022 4
2023 2
2024 2
2025 4
Total 137
Download as CSV

Boris Burle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boris Burle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 122
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Boris Burle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Boris Burle sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Boris Burle is affiliated with Aix-Marseille University in France. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology, with particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology subfields.

Their scholarly work extensively covers topics including Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Behavioral and Psychological Studies, Motor Control and Adaptation, Early Childhood Education and Development, and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety.

Burle has published in a variety of research venues, frequently contributing to Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, the Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, PLoS ONE, and bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory).

Recent publications include the following:

  • Time for action: neural basis of the costs and benefits of temporal predictability for competing response choices, 2022, HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Time for Action: Neural Basis of the Costs and Benefits of Temporal Predictability for Competing Response Choices, 2021, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Assessing model-based inferences in decision making with single-trial response time decomposition., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • The dynamics of interference control across childhood and adolescence: Distribution analyses in three conflict tasks and ten age groups., 2020, Developmental Psychology
  • On the Comparison Between the Nc/CRN and the Ne/ERN, 2022, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Their research collaborations include frequent co-authorship with Kamila Śmigasiewicz, Inga Korolczuk, Jennifer T. Coull, Magdalena Senderecka, and Agnès Blaye.

Best Publications

  • Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view

    Borís Burle;Laure Spieser;Clémence Roger;Laurence Casini

  • Action monitoring and medial frontal cortex: leading role of supplementary motor area.

    Francesca Bonini;Boris Burle;Boris Burle;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel;Jean Régis;Jean Régis

  • Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis.

    Borís Burle;Camille-Aimé Possamaï;Franck Vidal;Michel Bonnet

  • Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: Implications for internal clock models

    Borís Burle;Laurence Casini

  • Physiological Evidence for Response Inhibition in Choice Reaction Time Tasks.

    Borı́s Burle;Franck Vidal;Christophe Tandonnet;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • To head or to heed? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition: a review.

    Wery P.M. Van Den Wildenberg;Scott A. Wylie;Birte U. Forstmann;Borís Burle

  • Neurocognitive mechanisms of action control: resisting the call of the sirens

    K. Richard Ridderinkhof;Birte U. Forstmann;Scott A. Wylie;Borís Burle

  • Error negativity on correct trials: a reexamination of available data.

    Franck Vidal;Boris Burle;Michel Bonnet;Jacques Grapperon

  • Single-trial analysis of oddball event-related potentials in simultaneous EEG-fMRI

    Christian-G. Bénar;Christian-G. Bénar;Daniele Schön;Stephan Grimault;Bruno Nazarian

  • Error negativity does not reflect conflict: A reappraisal of conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex activity

    Borís Burle;Clémence Roger;Sonia Allain;Franck Vidal

  • The dual nature of time preparation: neural activation and suppression revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

    Karen Davranche;Karen Davranche;Christophe Tandonnet;Christophe Tandonnet;Boris Burle;Chloé Meynier;Chloé Meynier

  • Rostral Cingulate Zone and correct response monitoring: ICA and source localization evidences for the unicity of correct- and error-negativities

    Clémence Roger;Christian G. Bénar;Franck Vidal;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Physical exercise facilitates motor processes in simple reaction time performance: an electromyographic analysis.

    Karen Davranche;Borís Burle;Michel Audiffren;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: A tms study

    Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg;Borís Burle;Franck Vidal;Maurits W. van der Molen

  • Information processing during physical exercise: a chronometric and electromyographic study

    Karen Davranche;Borís Burle;Michel Audiffren;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • The modulation of the Ne-like wave on correct responses foreshadows errors.

    Sonia Allain;Laurence Carbonnell;Michael Falkenstein;Borís Burle

  • Deficit in motor cortical activity for simultaneous bimanual responses.

    Yuko Taniguchi;Borís Burle;Franck Vidal;Michel Bonnet

  • A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of information processing in the motor cortex: relationship between the silent period and the reaction time delay.

    Boris Burle;Michel Bonnet;Franck Vidal;Camille-Aime Possamaï

  • Dynamics of facilitation and interference in cue-priming and Simon tasks

    B. Burle;W.P.M. van den Wildenberg;K.R. Ridderinkhof

  • Cortico-spinal inhibition reflects time but not event preparation: neural mechanisms of preparation dissociated by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Thierry Hasbroucq;Allen Osman;Camille-Aimé Possamaı̈;Borı́s Burle

  • The influence of time preparation on motor processes assessed by surface Laplacian estimation

    Christophe Tandonnet;Boris Burle;Franck Vidal;Thierry Hasbroucq

  • Time for Action: Neural Basis of the Costs and Benefits of Temporal Predictability for Competing Response Choices.

    Inga Korolczuk;Inga Korolczuk;Boris Burle;Jennifer T. Coull;Kamila Śmigasiewicz

Frequent Co-Authors

Thierry Hasbroucq
Thierry Hasbroucq Aix-Marseille University
Franck Vidal
Franck Vidal Aix-Marseille University
Wim Gevers
Wim Gevers Université Libre de Bruxelles
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg
Wery P. M. van den Wildenberg University of Amsterdam
Jennifer T. Coull
Jennifer T. Coull Aix-Marseille University
Christian G. Bénar
Christian G. Bénar Aix-Marseille University
Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel
Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel Aix-Marseille University
Wim Notebaert
Wim Notebaert Ghent University
K. Richard Ridderinkhof
K. Richard Ridderinkhof University of Amsterdam
Michel Audiffren
Michel Audiffren University of Poitiers

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology can open doors to a wide range of exciting career pathways. Flexible online programs help students balance their studies with work and personal responsibilities, making higher education more accessible than ever. Many universities across the country now offer accredited online psychology degrees that have been carefully ranked for quality and value.

For example, prospective students in Ohio may want to review the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Cincinnati. If you reside in Illinois, the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Illinois can help identify top options near you. New York also boasts a variety of established options for those seeking flexible study; see a selection of online psychology bachelor's programs in New York. For students in Pennsylvania, exploring the best online bachelor's in psychology degree programs ranking in Pennsylvania can guide your educational journey.

Earning an online psychology degree can prepare you for roles in counseling, social services, human resources, or continued graduate studies. Consider your state-specific options, accreditation, and career goals to choose the right program for your future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Boris Burle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles