World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
7446
World Ranking
8272
National Ranking
98

Julie Duque publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Duque sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 111 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Julie Duque D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Duque sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Julie Duque is affiliated with the Université Catholique de Louvain in Belgium and specializes in the field of Neuroscience with a particular focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology. Their research involves various subfields, including Biomedical Engineering, Social Psychology, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work addresses multiple main topics, notably Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces, Motor Control and Adaptation, Muscle Activation and Electromyography Studies, Neurological Disorders and Treatments, and Action Observation and Synchronization.

Julie Duque has contributed to several recent papers that explore neural mechanisms and motor learning processes. These include:

  • Advanced TMS approaches to probe corticospinal excitability during action preparation, 2020, NeuroImage
  • Tuning the Corticospinal System: How Distributed Brain Circuits Shape Human Actions, 2020, The Neuroscientist
  • Non-invasive stimulation of the human striatum disrupts reinforcement learning of motor skills, 2024, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Reward boosts reinforcement-based motor learning, 2021, iScience
  • Hasty sensorimotor decisions rely on an overlap of broad and selective changes in motor activity, 2022, PLoS Biology

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors such as Gérard Derosière, Pierre Vassiliadis, Friedhelm C. Hummel, Caroline Quoilin, and Alexandre Zénon, reflecting interdisciplinary partnerships that contribute to a wide range of studies.

Publication venues where Julie Duque has frequently published include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, and NeuroImage. These platforms cover preprint archives, open access repositories, and peer-reviewed journals in human neuroscience and neurophysiology.

Best Publications

  • Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke

    Nagako Murase;Julie Duque;Julie Duque;Riccardo Mazzocchio;Riccardo Mazzocchio;Leonardo G Cohen

  • Formation of a motor memory by action observation.

    Katja Stefan;Leonardo G. Cohen;Julie Duque;Riccardo Mazzocchio

  • Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke

    Julie Duque;Friedhelm Hummel;Pablo Celnik;Nagako Murase;Nagako Murase

  • Physiological Markers of Motor Inhibition during Human Behavior

    Julie Duque;Ian Greenhouse;Ludovica Labruna;Ludovica Labruna;Richard B. Ivry;Richard B. Ivry

  • Intermanual Differences in Movement-related Interhemispheric Inhibition

    Julie Duque;Nagako Murase;Pablo Celnik;Friedhelm Hummel

  • Evidence for Two Concurrent Inhibitory Mechanisms during Response Preparation

    Julie Duque;David Lew;Riccardo Mazzocchio;Etienne Olivier

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Decomposing the Processes Underlying Action Preparation

    Sven Bestmann;Julie Duque

  • Role of Corticospinal Suppression during Motor Preparation

    Julie Duque;Richard B. Ivry

  • Dissociating the role of prefrontal and premotor cortices in controlling inhibitory mechanisms during motor preparation

    Julie Duque;Ludovica Labruna;Sophie Verset;Etienne Olivier

  • Encoding a motor memory in the older adult by action observation.

    Pablo Celnik;Katja Stefan;Friedhelm Hummel;Julie Duque

  • Kinematically Specific Interhemispheric Inhibition Operating in the Process of Generation of a Voluntary Movement

    Julie Duque;Riccardo Mazzocchio;J Dambrosia;Nagako Murase

  • Evaluation of handgrip force from EMG measurements.

    Julie Duque;Dominique Masset;Jacques Malchaire

  • Correlation between impaired dexterity and corticospinal tract dysgenesis in congenital hemiplegia

    Julie Duque;Jean Louis Thonnard;Yves Vandermeeren;Guillaume Sébire

  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice

    Flavio T.P. Oliveira;Jörn Diedrichsen;Timothy D. Verstynen;Julie Duque

  • Role of the Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex in Controlling the Timing of Hand Muscle Recruitment

    Marco Davare;Julie Duque;Yves Vandermeeren;Jean-Louis Thonnard

  • Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions

    Ignasi Cos;Ignasi Cos;Ignasi Cos;Julie Duque;Paul Cisek

  • Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict.

    Pierre-Alexandre Klein;Charlotte Petitjean;Etienne Olivier;Julie Duque

  • Influence of Reward on Corticospinal Excitability during Movement Preparation

    Pierre-Alexandre Klein;Etienne Olivier;Julie Duque

  • Top-down inhibitory control exerted by the medial frontal cortex during action selection under conflict

    Julie Duque;Etienne Olivier;Matthew Rushworth

  • Influence of Somatosensory Input on Interhemispheric Interactions in Patients With Chronic Stroke

    Agnes Floel;Friedhelm Hummel;Julie Duque;Stefan Knecht

Frequent Co-Authors

Etienne Olivier
Etienne Olivier Université Catholique de Louvain
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Friedhelm C. Hummel
Friedhelm C. Hummel École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
André Mouraux
André Mouraux Université Catholique de Louvain
Leonardo G. Cohen
Leonardo G. Cohen National Institutes of Health
Paul Cisek
Paul Cisek University of Montreal
Philippe de Timary
Philippe de Timary Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
Valéry Legrain
Valéry Legrain Université Catholique de Louvain
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscientists often explore related fields to broaden their career opportunities. Many students consider online psychology programs for a flexible and cost-effective route. Comparing psychology degree cost is a crucial first step, as tuition rates can vary widely between accredited institutions.

For those interested in counseling or social work, enrolling in the easiest online msw program may lead to rewarding careers supporting individuals and communities through evidence-based practice.

Graduate-level pathways such as a psyd online program are popular among students aiming for clinical psychology roles, focusing on the practical application of psychological principles.

Additionally, students interested in relationship and family dynamics can find marriage and family therapy online programs accredited, which prepare graduates to help families navigate mental health challenges.

Exploring these online degree options allows students to align their education with personal interests and professional goals while maintaining flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Duque

Trending Scientists